"...At the mouth of two or three witnesses shall the matter be established..." Duet. 19:15Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Printable View
"...At the mouth of two or three witnesses shall the matter be established..." Duet. 19:15Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
I suspect they didn't have crackheads-who'll-say-anything-to-get-a-free-fix or coerced convicts-on-parole-afraid-to-go-back-to-prison-so-they'll-say-anything when they used the term 'witnesses'.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Joseph
Regeneration is important part of that. As being clean and renewed by God from within so that the manner in which one is led by the Spirit rather than by mere carnality. Clearly the psalmist comprehended this: "Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me." (Psalms 51:10) Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. (Proverbs 3:5) "Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord" (Ephesians 5:19). For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. (Romans 8:14)Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Joseph
Power to become sons of God vs. power to become God. This may point to an error in that some may be led to believe that is their will or 'meditation on secret frequencies' that gives them this or that kind of power or 'level of consciouesness'. The 'total depravity' that Calvinists might speak of might be true or partly true PRIOR to Spiritual regeneration but not so afterwards. It was once said to me that the epistles for the regenerate, the four gospels are primarily for those yet called out.Quote:
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, [even] to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
We should finally admit that the god — imagined by effete humanity to dwell in the clouds — lives in our hearts, in our spirit. He fully divested himself of his being and poured it out completely over mankind. He did not want to retain anything of his own will because he wanted mankind to be a race that rules itself in full freedom.That is, logic that is grounded by Christ , not upon any effete or Churched tradition but upon a new investigation of thought as it actually is in its psychological foundations, in its significance for knowledge, and its actual operation in scientific and spiritual methods.
Christ emanated into the world. Man's will is his will, man's goals, his goals. By implanting into mankind an (entire being-ness) he gave up an existence of his own for Us. Kingdoms He ceased to be this kingdoms God for the sake of the freedom of mankind, for the divine-ness of the world. We have taken into ourselves the highest potency of existence, therefore no external power, only our own creations can give us satisfactions. All lamenting about an existence that does not satisfy us, about this hard world, must vanish in the presence of the thought, that no power in the world could satisfy us if we ourselves did not bestow upon it the power through which it can gladden and elevate us. If a god from outside our world were to bring us the joys of heaven and we had to take them as he prepared them, without our participation, we would have to refuse, because they would be the joys devoid of freedom. He who has seen Me has seen the Father well one day we might also be emanated
We have no right to expect satisfaction from powers outside of us. Faith has promised us reconciliation with the evils of this world, Redeemer brought about by a God from outside this world. when mankind will not have to hope anymore for a redemption from outside, because mankind will recognize that it must bring about its own bliss, just as it afflicted deep wounds upon itself.The Christ Revolution meant the sweeping away of effete beliefs and institutions, but implied also the necessity of a reconstructive process.When we join Christ. as God is a kingdom. We are a WORLD. LUCIFER that effete individual gets placed in the same clouds if theirs transition in heaven its only happened once.
The Revolution had made war on princes and privilege, and the common people had in general gained wherever the Napoleonic regime had been substituted for their effete despotisms; but the Continental System was felt as an oppression in every humble household, suddenly deprived of the little imported luxuries, such as sugar and coffee, which custom had made necessaries; and from this time date the beginnings of that popular revolt against Napoleon that was to culminate in the War of Liberation.
And, as a matter of fact, it has been seen that many so-called sceptics were rather critics of the effete systems which they found cumbering the ground than actual doubters of the possibility of knowledge in general.
Read more at http://sentence.yourdictionary.com/e...CUXrPWXvBdL.99 Physical sacrifices are the ones that'll never be written down.
I am considering carefully the term effete.
adjective
The definition of effete is someone who lacks vigor or is too soft or over refined, or something that is no longer producing.
When no one listens to the leader of the group any more and his power has essentially diminished to nothing, this is an example of an effete leader.
When academics think that they are intellectually superior to everyone, this is an example of when they might be described as effete.
Read more at http://www.yourdictionary.com/effete...fFpjjjVZR6h.99 when one runs out of clever words use the varied or unlikely site gringo
If one man holds his supreme or absolute sovereign to be one far off, and another imagines or serves a god that is not an afar off god, then logic might have it that those are two different gods. Related: panentheism vs. pantheism. A title is not a name. I'm not sure how unity or sameness would be derived simply by using the same titles. The president of one state and the president of another state are disparate and separate, similarity titles doesn't amount to a sameness.Quote:
Originally Posted by xparte
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Quote:
Attachment 3975
This book is a comprehensive study of the history of the political thought of the Dutch Revolt (1555-90). It explores the development of the political ideas which motivated and legitimized the Dutch resistance against the government of Philip II in the Low Countries, and which became the ideological foundations of the Dutch Republic as it emerged as one of the main powers of Europe. It shows how notions of liberty, constitutionalism, representation and popular sovereignty were of central importance to the political thought and revolutionary events of the Dutch Revolt, giving rise to a distinct political theory of resistance, to fundamental debates on the 'best state' of the new Dutch commonwealth and to passionate disputes on the relationship between church and state which prompted some of the most eloquent early modern pleas for religious toleration.
First, I suspect American high schools leaving out particulars of the Dutch Revolt do students a hefty disfavor. Why? Because it may be that the ideals behind the Dutch Revolt carried over into the American Revolution moreso than that of the French revolution (it is suggest that the monarchy was a vicitim of PSYOPS). In the same way the early American Revolutionists are mischaracterized as rebels and personalities like Locke and Bacon, the American Revolution might be errantly twinned with the French Revolution instead of the Dutch Revolt. Pairing it with the Dutch Revolt ties in too much with the idea of a Bible based society without mischaracterization of the gospel. Pairing the American Revolution with the French Revolution on the other hands might serve to pair the American Revolution with a more atheistic philosophies which may very well be to mischaracterize it.
- The American Revolution and War of Independence Was Not A Rebellion (By Gray W. Clark)
- Leibniz, Not Locke, Inspired the Declaration of Independence
- How The Venetian Virus Infected and Took Over England
- The Venetian Takeover of Enland: A 200-Year Project
- Doing Good In the World: Cotton Mather and the Origins of Modern Philanthropy
- Essays to Do Good (Cotton Mather - 1825 / Multiple formats at archive.org)
- Abraham Lincoln & Freemasonry
Nonetheless, I'd also suggest it to be important to consider that crowns and rulers existed before the Templars. I don't suspect there to be a single 'crown' although one or more shops might wish to impose 'only man in town' syndrome on the planet. Consider the pundits of 'world takeover' as having a very bad allergy to the Tennis Court Oath and so forming the UN and fomenting wars ('wars costs money + debt as slavery' paradigm) to increase debt and thwart shaking off of debt. A 'security problem' in Africa might be where a debt saddle country throws sheds its State and forms a new one: troops get sent in, the leaders is called all the negative Orwellian bad-buzzwords. Pervert dictators with perverse sexual appetites are easily pleased and fed by dark handlers. Men who care about their country will demand equity and the money system comes under scrutiny PDQ.
You concurred that the Templars traced themselves back to the post-1099 "king of Jerusalem" paradigm. Other similar or related organization may very well subscribe to teh same idea. So the story goes, they thought they were reliving a "when you see Jerusalem surrounded" prophetic event--but little did they know that happened 1,000 years before. But they didn't realize that until later. Legend has it they discovered some secret that they believed they could wield against the Papacy. Maybe the story has something to do with mischaracterization of the gospel? Perhaps they continued that tradition of mischaracterization if there was any? The claim of Europeans kings that they can trace their lineage back to "King David"? Meaning David Al-Roy vs David of ancient Israel? Same sound different kings, makes for quite the deception. It seems very unlikely the six-pointed star was something David of the Old Testament would have held as his family symbol. Its doubtful that Samuel would have allowed him to live for too long if he had. The evidence, however, shows that David Al-Roy was associated with that star (regarded to be the Star of Remphan/Chiun/Saturn-- Chiun allegedly being another way of spelling 'Cain'... China?) and that some of his successors may have carried it forward.
Quote:
One of Bonaparte's grievances against Cacault was a saying attributed to the latter: "How many sources of his glory would cease if Bonaparte ever chose to play Henry VIII!" Even in those days of harmony Cacault had a presentiment that the Napoleonic policy would yet threaten the dignity of the Holy See.
The idea is that the French Revolution was about bringing Feudalism to an end. Another idea is that the NWO pundits are aiming to bring feudalism back on as planetary a scale as possible. But yet we see the same overthrowers of the French monarchy instituting collectivism and closed oligarchy. Same shoes, different feet? Isn't that what the Bolsheviks did????Quote:
Robespierre becomes god Christians are massacred under the new Atheist fervor in 1792-1793
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...ier_consul.jpg
Interestingly in Italy, Aristotle is widely presented in high schools. Seems that Aristotle found oligarchies to be quite "tasty".
Interesting: atheism + aristocracy ("No god but us"?) + Gnostic idea of a universe with equally matched forces of good and evil.Quote:
Atheism is aristocratic; the idea of a great Being that watches over oppressed innocence and punishes triumphant crime is altogether popular. Maximilien Robespierre
http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/attac...0&d=1462332805
Qos also means 'bow.
Attachment 3977
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation..._of_Turkey.svg
Turkey coat of arms.
Quote:
Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a fruitful bough {ben is used here} by a well; whose branches run over the wall: The archers have sorely grieved him, and shot at him, and hated him. Genesis 49:22-23 (the word archers is queshet...similar to quesh/qos, no?)
Related:
All they need is a little attention.
Flippancy aside, by amplifying the guilt of Abraham and Sarah's incest, they need no printing presses. The debt is avoid the wrath of an angry God who can order you to kill your own bloodline.
Thank you for clarifying that. I appreciate the insight into the Dutch Revolt leading up to the Charter of 1629.
Quote:
First, I suspect American high schools leaving out particulars of the Dutch Revolt do students a hefty disfavor. Why? Because it may be that the ideals behind the Dutch Revolt carried over into the American Revolution moreso than that of the French revolution (it is suggest that the monarchy was a vicitim of PSYOPS). In the same way the early American Revolutionists are mischaracterized as rebels and personalities like Locke and Bacon, the American Revolution might be errantly twinned with the French Revolution instead of the Dutch Revolt. Pairing it with the Dutch Revolt ties in too much with the idea of a Bible based society without mischaracterization of the gospel. Pairing the American Revolution with the French Revolution on the other hands might serve to pair the American Revolution with a more atheistic philosophies which may very well be to mischaracterize it.
Sounds like mischaracterization of the torah?Quote:
Flippancy aside, by amplifying the guilt of Abraham and Sarah's incest, they need no printing presses. The debt is avoid the wrath of an angry God who can order you to kill your own bloodline.
Thank you for clarifying that. I appreciate the insight into the Dutch Revolt leading up to the Charter of 1629.
guilt
incest
wrath
kill
These are the words used to describe the happenings involving the man chosen by The Creator to be the 'father' of His new and set-apart nation amidst the evil, rebellion and iniquity practiced by the people of Babylon/Mesopotamia whom He scattered around the world and whose language He confused.
I guess when one engages in mischaracterization of the gospel by using the term 'bastard' to describe the anointed Christ and unique Son of God, the same sentiment pervades one's view throughout scripture.