admonished is abundantly profitable when delivery is between advise or urge. It appears my material is introspective? I should review my sentiment more.
Printable View
admonished is abundantly profitable when delivery is between advise or urge. It appears my material is introspective? I should review my sentiment more.
I believe it was RETNIAP that put this out there:
Alternatively, I came up with this ...Quote:
By: {true name} for the State of (w/e)
Quote:
By: {true name} for the parties
here is what a WIN looks like ....
when an Attorney has to represent someone incompetent, and uses MY research
arding this, including some neat defenses, one which an Attorney just used to win a speeding Case with my help
NEW YORK SPEEDING TICKET DISMISSED ON NOVEL SUPPORTING DEPOSITION ISSUE
by Peter Tilem
Share on Google+
New York Traffic Lawyers & Associates successfully won a motion which resulted in a speeding ticket being dismissed completely on novel grounds. Our client was charged with a violation of VTL §1180 (c) for traveling 40 miles per hour in a 25 mile an hour zone. Approximately 15 days after receiving the ticket, the Defendant mailed the ticket to court indicating that he was pleading not guilty and further indicating that he was requesting supporting depositions.
New York Criminal Procedure Law § 100.25(2) provides that a defendant charged by a simplified information is, upon a timely request, entitled as a matter of right to a supporting deposition of a complainant police officer and that upon such a request, a court must order the officer to serve a copy of the same within 30 days of the date such request is received by the court, or at least five days before trial, whichever is earlier.
Approximately six days after receiving the Defendant’s request, the Court mailed an order for the supporting deposition to the local sheriff’s department and acknowledged the Defendant’s request. Approximately six days after that the Defendant received a copy of the supporting deposition. However, the affidavit of service accompanying the supporting deposition says that it was mailed to the Defendant but it not specify the address of the Defendant to which the supporting deposition was allegedly mailed.
An affidavit of service that failed to set forth the address to which the supporting deposition was mailed fails to establish that a proper mailing occurred as required by law. N.Y. C.P.L.R. §§2103 (c) and (f)(1). .
In our case, while the supporting deposition was mailed timely, the affidavit of service affixed to it failed to provide the mailing address of the Defendant as required by law. Further, the supporting deposition was sent timely to the Defendant but the People never corrected this defective service issue. By failing to correct the service issue, the People divested the Court of jurisdiction and the Court could not proceed on the simplified traffic informations, because this was a divestiture that cannot be “cured.
Thus, because the affidavit of service lacked the required information, in accord with case law, the People of the State of New York could not establish that a proper mailing occurred. Because that proper mailing never occurred and the supporting depositions were in essence never served, we were able to obtain a complete dismissal for our client.
If you receive a ticket for speeding or another moving violation, do not simply pay the ticket and plead guilty without knowing all of the consequences. Contact us for a free telephone consultation to discuss your ticket and all of the potential penalties that may be imposed
We all enjoy the word deemed especially when it comes to service, because the affidavit of service lacked the required information,or the clerk sends it next door are you beating speeding tickets or is this just compensation for his DRIVER LICENSE that failed to set forth the address identify me you can address me with my true name if your successfully helping DRIVERS this site has none we just carry that commercial prick for competence like Merrill says a true name signature and officer you just address me but a true name will specify the address foreign Defendants to which the supporting deposition was allegedly mailed. standing and getting punked hell if u got folks claiming a residence what help am i to a successfull enterprise like this sorry Bin man just knowing your not a deemed a defendant is the biggest step in ones success
if you intend to carry and tender a DL, then you have to be able to keep such from suspension, and the resultant Misdemeanor the next time you get stopped, now "Driving or Operating" under suspension
having some"true name" doesn't stop the suspension, it simply gar-un-tee's arrest
Legal tendering A DL no that's to bill a driver account I have no such instructions for carrying one my insurance is all that needs carrying and registration is tagged on the car the true name is my living signature that space provided for electronic endorsement minus a sir name the undertaker now has a live one no corpse the LEO has a choice and his undertaking not mine DL comes with a Defendants Address how else did this defect reach your success story next too paying its r4c you make one great point the free phone call to discuss pentalies for driving stop driving and hang up the DL for identification and the phone calls well we know a free call when u don't have a call of your own it's a service call and no success sorry bin the pitch might work in Long Island or white plains never in Queens
The REGISTRATION acts as SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION.Quote:
Originally Posted by xparte
If the agents have no personal jurisdiction on a DRIVER then the VEHICLE REGISTRATION grants them jurisdiction on the car. The registered owner gets the charge for towing and storage not the driver/traveler.
The STATE is simply following International protocol to manage public safety, after all that is why they exist.
I am reading this and wondering about the compreheszion skilz of the Forumites hereQuote:
Originally Posted by walter
there is no Personam Jurisdiction over a DRIVER ...???
my head is spinning out of control ...
just what kinda special Crack do people smoke here ...??
Please, someone...like, you know, X-Party ..
post some judicial Opinions by an Appellate Court in contradiction of my " WIN"
and
why tendering a DL won't get it suspended for FtA
It's like the blind leading the dumb ...
or--
isit the Dumb leading the Blind ..??
Spoken from a etheric materialistic attorney propounded in esoteric philosophies as the first or lowest layer in the "human energy field" or aura. What your suggesting is to phone some clever prick that can beat a system well you need to be part of that system to win what. as your comprehension skilz of the Forumites is flawed we forgive folks like you and the clerks your hedging bets on. insulting as you might think my pedestrian mind warbles its ironic i have obtained the arms length i have redeemed my true name without hedging bets on a system you legally defend i have [wone with one ] my hats off to all Forumites less advertisements that need a systematic win [ too be wone with one ]its a freethinker advertising nobody that Middle English word wone (“custom, habit”), from Old English wuna take the legal prizes .youll need the entry fees.It's like the blind leading the dumb ...
or--
isit the Dumb leading the Blind ..?? only when it comes to clerk service and judicial misconduct loopholes and your free conciliatory call on how to avoid service a commercial address is a nightmare only when you're in the system. BINNY youll never address me with success i haven't a system .In Vegas its called card counting
Quote:
Originally Posted by Binbokusai Yagyuu
Nope, that stuff'll waste ya.
Binbokusai Yagyuu, I see you're associated in some way with Marc Steven's NoStateProject.....hey, good on you, man.....whatever gets ya the results you seek.
Lemme ask ya.....what Nationality are ya, US citizen? Probably so.....so ya gotta play in that sandbox....it's a privilege I understand.
I used to be a US citizen.....now I'm Floridian
walter jurisdiction over a true name thats not in any DRIVER system is a big undertaking for law enforcement having a registered and fully insured automobile is the commercial equivalent to the competency required why be a driver when its only for commercial salvage the sharks can smell it but its a true name preventing them tasting a payday.How do you get jurisdiction over [nobody] if you dont identify yourself correctly its understood your standing under that of a driver.Even i get it dont invite X too the Party
You miss the essence of Court of Record.Quote:
Originally Posted by Binbokusai Yagyuu
Attachment 4356
P.S. Suppose that you create a Record, with a competent clerk of court (USDC), that the "judge" has a deviant or non-extant oath of office?
Chex brought up a good argument about de facto authority, and I have examined some arguments in the Colorado courts too. The attempts to find "proof" or even evidence on the Internet fails rules of evidence. I believe by some of your points that you know that.
In truth, after some of your points I would not be surprised to find you are an attorney here believing that you could satisfy your superiority complex through legal vitiation of some of the knowledge and perceptions around here. I would be disappointed though, considering what an asset for educational development we would have going.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ag maniac
me ..??
I wish to have NO Political affiliation ...
saaaayy ..
what Evidence might You present that I knowingly, willingly, voluntarily sought the privileges and immunities of a " US Citizen "..?
None whatsoever.....that you volunteered into such status, however, you may wish to have NO political affiliation, but you were born with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Binbokusai Yagyuu
......let me ask again -- we're all presumed US citizens by operation of law via the 14th amendment, so have you knowingly, willingly & voluntarily claimed your true nationality with your own pledge of allegiance to the nation you were born into? Expatriation Act, 15 Stat 249, 8 USC 1481(a)(2)
One angle I have seen a few times is to make negative averment to the state department, saying you are strictly a state Citizen, not a US Citizen, attached to the Passport Application. I believe that they simply approve your US Passport any more. In the past they would acknowledge that you were born in a state and therefore qualify as a US citizen for a US Passport.
I think these days they just mail you the Passport.
Years ago I gave a cop my brothers name and date of birth, he followed use for a while then pulled us over again and came running up to where I was sitting and started freaking on me telling me he is taking me in for giving him a false name bla bla.Quote:
Originally Posted by xparte
I repeated the name and date of birth to him. I knew it was a real legal name with a valid date of birth so I stuck to my guns. The cop asked me if I ever had a DL? I said no because I knew my brother never got one. Then he asked if I was ever arrested? I said no.
Then I asked him if he was going to arrest me because I don't have a DL and never been arrested before?
He wanted to but he came to his sense and reluctantly gave me a few more snarls and then let us go.
The NAME is only used to open the DL account. Its the DL account they have jurisdiction over.
Who is the registered owner of the vehicle?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registered_owner
The term registered owner is usually used in instances of title of a vehicle (such as an automobile) to refer to the person who has right of possession of the vehicle, as opposed to the party that has right of property. The party that has right of property is referred to as a lienholder, and in the event the registered owner fails to pay off the lien according to the agreed-to terms, the lienholder has the right to invoke repossession of the vehicle.
And that is jurisdiction over the car.
Exactly... NOTICE OF LIENQuote:
Originally Posted by walter
Certificate of Service.
Criminal behavior like murder, and misusing the War Statute default, without any authority of possession or ownership.
I found it particularly of interest that the Three Wise Men in the scenario (last page) are all women; the Oil of the Holy Spirit and Wisdom as depicted in Proverbs 1-11.
Attachment 4357
How many Chinese princesses does it take to fill a bottle of #9 Bask 99%?
Attachment 4358
Answer: 153 - (see John 21:11)
Quote:
Joh 21:3 Simon Peter saith unto them, I go a fishing. They say unto him, We also go with thee. They went forth, and entered into a ship immediately; and that night they caught nothing.
Joh 21:4 But when the morning was now come, Jesus stood on the shore: but the disciples knew not that it was Jesus.
Joh 21:5 Then Jesus saith unto them, Children, have ye any meat? They answered him, No.
Joh 21:6 And he said unto them, Cast the net on the right side of the ship/brain The Female Side, and ye shall find. They cast therefore, and now they were not able to draw it for the multitude of fishes.
Joh 21:7 Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved saith unto Peter, It is the Lord. Now when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he girt his fisher's coat unto him, (for he was naked,) and did cast himself into the sea.
Joh 21:8 And the other disciples came in a little ship; (for they were not far from land, but as it were two hundred cubits,) dragging the net with fishes.
Joh 21:9 As soon then as they were come to land, they saw a fire of coals there, and fish laid thereon, and bread.
Joh 21:10 Jesus saith unto them, Bring of the fish which ye have now caught.
Joh 21:11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so many, yet was not the net broken.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
no, David ..
in my STATE "Traffic " is either administrative, i.e. Traffic Violations Bureau, or a "Justice" Court venue
niether of which are Courts of Record
by the bye...
Am Jur is not dispositive of anything in Court
Have fun with that.
To me, a court of record means a proper oath of office. If the oath is deviant from that prescribed by law, then the office of "judge" is vacant. But I still tend to use USDC Clerks of Court as published on PACER.
Attachment 4359
Of course I am in a minority...
Attachment 4360
Attachment 4361
The Secretary of State's oath looks like a stock certificate - a bond.
Big difference then "Court of Register" being "Court of Fact" being "De-facto Court".Quote:
Originally Posted by David Merrill
I probably have posted this here before, but will probably post it several more times as the opportunity presents itself.
In reaching the conclusion that the cable franchise is not a license, we begin with the hornbook definition of a license:
A permit, granted by an appropriate governmental body, generally for a consideration, to a person, firm, or corporation to pursue some occupation or to carry on some business subject to regulation under the police power. A license is not a contract between the state and the licensee, but is a mere personal permit.
Schloss v. City of Indianapolis
Supreme Court of Indiana
Good stuff there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by walter
Courts not of record.
I asked once, Is this a court of record. The "judge" silently gestured toward the transcriber. I was still unclear until he mumbled, We are recording...
So the preservation of the Record with a competent clerk and notarized transcribers is essential.
I gave up R4C on traffic tickets long ago; generally not effective. MJ has outlined why. I handle them administratively. In fact making them go away has become rather routine and automatic.
The risk in playing warrior, aside from injury and scars, is finding yourself fighting something unintended; someone else's war. Or worse yet, fighting your brother. Over what? Because he lives in Pennsylvania and you're in Maryland?
That sure looks like it is best paid off lawful money demanded. Fighting with foreign computer cash cows is the stuff bad dreams are made of.
If you write a letter that stops the computer, we would like to see that.
Sorry, didn't make myself clear. There's nothing to pay. True Name showed up at the hearing to handle the matter, with honor. The judgment as you see was NR (not responsible). $105 saved and no marks/points against the driving record. As usual I beat the traffic ticket. Thank you David & MJ!
I don't recall ever visiting beattraffictickets.org but notice the domain is owned by Bottomline Publications, the prolific marketer known for its "negative option billing" practice. Essentially sending you the next book/newsletter (even if you don't want it) and then billing you for it.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boardroom_Inc.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/...rch/bottomline
You are welcome and thank you!
Nice, stay in honor.
Traffic Ticket what is it? IMO its a notice of a violation but the CLERK needs to DOCKET a case from the violation ticket # that's visible on this negotiable instrument. But the CLERK files a docked complaint after 3 business days cause youve failed to appear as the CLERK has to enter her complaint into the summary judgement world. The municipality merely sends a stack of violations to a JP. That JP or CLERK bonds the SSN with the hopes your going plea or possibly pay on or before your summons ticket date or fail to appear thats her complaint or cause of action. The ticket is the admission (pun intended) or is it. it is a summons (aka: an order to appear) So appear and refuse the offer thats not in the system yet . The complaint is docked under oath and penalty of perjury applies we dont have you in the system yet well u do now I have appeared and refused the admissions offer have a nice day . notice and complaint thats the police policy but the clerk writes it up as failure to appear complaint . If u show up after 3 days she still wins if u dont its a bigger win hedging the performance bonds . She cant complain that its not in the system also give the chief of policy a copy and let them complain to each other .
Revisiting a mixture of proper notice and registered complaint the police are the informants but its the CLERK who is docking the case does she need to wait 3 business days or is that the notification period before the complaint gets docked. Its not in the system yet ok I appeared lets put that in the system. Why would the CLERK say come back in a few days.
It is unfortunate you were ticketed for operating without a license.
Only the chair and ranking minority member, or a Permanent Select Committee employee if yielded to by the chair or ranking minority member, may type posts to the thread during such periods of posting.
https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/h...6hres660eh.xml
re - presenting Tell me violation police are the legislative branch of government or the judicial .branch. dont call me MR MR your just a rank stranger. Just yield the right away within 3 days
deemed necessary to the investigation—a ticket violation in triplicate form summons original contract and complaint by subpoena or otherwise. failing to appear . Speak to that marcel from any chair that yields ya. I havent raised a jurisdiction eyebrow on the subject matter does the police file the complaint or just the violation information that just looks like a complaint ticket.