Just A Review

[Leo Undelli]

http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Joe.html

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f3949a.pdf Form for Public Servants who think they are above the law

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f13909.pdf Form for county departments who refuse to provide their filed form 990's

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f211.pdf Reward for reporting Public Servants who steal from the united States of America

http://www.unclefed.com/IRS-Forms/ Good source for W-4 forms

[Leo Undelli]

Counter Deed - (Law) a secret writing which destroys, invalidates, or alters, a public deed. http://tinyurl.com/oo26klj

Take your Counter Deed and sign in front of four witnesses......have the four witnesses sign the Counter Deed in front of Notary

I have not tried this yet, but sounds good....thus removing your signature from Notary using witnesses as buffer. Not sure what description of property one uses and what format is included in counter deed.....I use bond paper for important documents.

Each state's statutes has code similar to the following California Code:

California GOVERNMENT CODE http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Joe.html
SECTION 26900

26900. The auditor shall examine and settle the accounts of any
persons indebted to the county or holding money payable into the
county treasury, and shall certify the amount to the treasurer. Upon
the presentation and filing of the treasurer's receipt therefor, the
auditor shall give to such person a discharge and charge the
treasurer with the amount received by him.

[property tax, child support, etc]

This is your Remedy for county taking care of your bills issued by the county....counties are all non-profit charity organizations...thus the elusive FORM 990 the counties do not want you to see. The counties EIN numbers are on the FORM 990

[David Merrill]

That was where I began.

I removed my signatures for all documents at the county clerk and recorder. I could still get that by certified doc if I wanted - even back in what? 1994?

Then I signed my approbation to the Survey - otherwise known as the Declaration of Independence. This was done in the form of Matthew THORNTON, who arrived in Pennsylvania in November of 1776 wanting to add his signature.

My approbation is published through the county clerk and recorder. One time of several I went for certified copies and they kept behaving like they could not find it. I told them to call the sheriff to investigate and maybe arrest the clerk. They pretended to look really hard, staring at their computer screens all dumb. I remembered that I had to feed the meter and suddenly took off out the door directly for my car, and the Sheriff's office. I came back after dropping some coins into the meter and there were two copies, all certified and nobody around. I found somebody and the copies were free!

It is amusing how and where we can find validations like in your post.

[Chex]

That was where I began. My approbation is published through the county clerk and recorder. One time of several I went for certified copies and they kept behaving like they could not find it. I told them to call the sheriff to investigate and maybe arrest the clerk. They pretended to look really hard, staring at their computer screens all dumb. I remembered that I had to feed the meter and suddenly took off out the door directly for my car, and the Sheriff's office. I came back after dropping some coins into the meter and there were two copies, all certified and nobody around. I found somebody and the copies were free!

You think your counter trolls are incompetent; you should listen to the ones we deal with.

Since this forum is considered a “just a review” let’s look at something else.

Senator Harry Reid
One of the biggest public supporters of the Affordable Care Act has reportedly decided that some of his staff should be exempted from the new law.

This picture reminds me of him saying. Got ya, again.

His view. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7mRSI8yWwg

A spokesman for Louisiana Republican David Vitter told Yahoo News that the senator has introduced the "Show Your Exemption Act," which would require all members of Congress to publicly list which staff members have been exempted.http://news.yahoo.com/harry-reid-exe...192925037.html

42 USC § 18115 - Freedom not to participate in Federal health insurance programs | Title 42 - The Public Health and Welfare | U.S. Code | LII / Legal Information Institute.http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/18115

Current through Pub. L. 113-36. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
42 USC § 18115 states No individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs.

[David Merrill]

WOW!

That is precious information. Thanks!


Current through Pub. L. 113-36. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
42 USC § 18115 states No individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendments), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs.

[allodial]

The main distinction is whether the "lawful money' is elastic or inelastic. ....the just and proper balances guaranteed by "Father's trust".

Simple iron nails might expand or contract in actual size depending on the weather. But the expansion or contraction is 'universal' effecting 'everyone'. Thus you can have universal 'micro-elasticity' and it would be just. Gold might be worth more one day than another, but again its a 'universal' kind of flexibility or elasticity to the extent that the change is 'just' or, rather, 'equitable'.

All of "Father's trustees" remain silent and in voluntary ignorance.

This is probably due to the fact that each of these men and women 'moonlight' for "Mr. Stranger" and prefer said 'moonlighting' over their 'day job'.

I have found it best to avoid making presumptions about the trustees. Perhaps they have a gun to their head? Perhaps they are sworn to do nothing unless the heir shows competence. As in perhaps they have a very strict rule for what evidences competence. If the heir hasn't done his homework, they might construe the heir to be sleep/dead/incompetent/insane/'not quite ready'. Alternatively, perhaps the typical office holder is totally clueless. If Father told the heir about system works, why is the heir begging the trustee to teach him? Father can hire 1,000,000 men to repair or maintain different aspects of the Great Machine but you know, the servants might just expect the heir to know more than they do.



Perhaps 'stealing candy from a baby' is code for 'robbing the incompetent heir'?

[Anthony Joseph]

Simple iron nails might expand or contract in actual size depending on the weather. But the expansion or contraction is 'universal' effecting 'everyone'. Thus you can have universal 'micro-elasticity' and it would be just. Gold might be worth more one day than another, but again its a 'universal' kind of flexibility or elasticity to the extent that the change is 'just' or, rather, 'equitable'.



I have found it best to avoid making presumptions about the trustees. Perhaps they have a gun to their head? Perhaps they are sworn to do nothing unless the heir shows competence. As in perhaps they have a very strict rule for what evidences competence. If the heir hasn't done his homework, they might construe the heir to be sleep/dead/incompetent/insane/'not quite ready'. Alternatively, perhaps the typical office holder is totally clueless. If Father told the heir about system works, why is the heir begging the trustee to teach him? Father can hire 1,000,000 men to repair or maintain different aspects of the Great Machine but you know, the servants might just expect the heir to know more than they do.



Perhaps 'stealing candy from a baby' is code for 'robbing the incompetent heir'?

Have you shown competence to a knowledgeable and willing trustee who, in turn, performed as is required?

[allodial]

Have you shown competence to a knowledgeable and willing trustee who, in turn, performed as is required?

Of course. In my time, I have seen tax accounts settled, driver licenses unsuspended, felony cases sealed, full immunity honored and supported, licenses issued and much much more.

Competence can be shown: [1] by not contradicting oneself, [2] by not asking the public servant to do that which would be unlawful, [3] by making it evident that you know the law, statute, regulation, underlying principles and the lay of the land without contradicting oneself in principle or [4] by not requesting or demanding to contradictory things.

Re: competence -> Being exhaustive in one's studies and being footed on unshakable foundations is perhaps key. Taking the time to know what the trustee might be bound to is important. If Father has told the Treasure Room Guardian to hold the valuables and toys and goodies safe and only transfer them for the given price or else the Treasure Room Guardian would be punished, the son doesn't come along and simply take things, the son would leave the Treasure Room Guardian with some remedy. Doesn't the Bible call for one to be a good master? Not being a good master might also be evidence of incompetence. Does the good master put his Treasure Room Guardian in the position of being punished for missing property but allow his sons to take property without remedy. Just an example.

Ways to show incompetence: [1] being inconsistent about who or what you are or what role you are playing; [2] showing excessive blind emotionalism to the extent that it ruptures through the document in question; [3] talking or writing too much (kitchen sinking) or too little; [4] revealing your lack of knowledge or wisdom about the topic or matter in question; [5] glaring guffaws such as "I'm not a resident" but having an "address" that clearly shows you to be resident; [6] treating the trustee like an enemy while also expecting the trustee to perform as if not an enemy--if the trustee is truly an enemy then he should be removed from office not expected to perform honorably right?; [7] trading or dealing with the enemy as if he were your friend or trading or dealing with the enemy at all; [8] making requests from or begging to inferiors; [9] arguing with inferiors.

Rather than being blind angry or hyper-emotional, it has proven far more effective and important to ask and to knock on the Door for remedy. Believe me: I have been injured, attacked, kidnapped and more. But am I angry? No. Was I angry at some point? Yes. Anger can be a healthy motivator to get er done but I don't suspect anger to be a good ultimate inspiration. Believe me, the Adversary has at some point had to deal with regret. Anger shouldn't cause a shift away from principled foundations.

Someone once told me about HALT. They say to make self-assessments regularly: [H]ungry, [A]ngry, [L]onely, [T]ired. If you are ever all in the state of all of the above or nearly so then halt--stop...cool your boots. Pray, gather your senses to avoid getting into a blindly destructive cycle or more. With law and the like I find to always be important to focus on the Greater Good for oneself and for others as being of great import. When such directs and inspires what you do, I would question whether there be any judge, military, weapon, tyrant or power on the planet that can steadfastly resist such.

***

One thing that some might do well to get a grip on is that the trustees might often be allergic to liability. If you want a state officer to handle a given matter, you want them to be competent enough to do so and typically the higher level officers are trained adequately or reasonably so: attorney general, secretary of state, minister or director of revenue, etc. Laying 'burdens' on someone that can't handle isn't 'good master'.

[David Merrill]

Daydreaming I found myself in a scenario related to arraignment. The judge was badgering me about being in the State of Colorado. [Of meaning Issuance.] The Great Seal is more often than not part of my signature as I am trustee of the resulting trust.

The breach of trust that created the opportunity for me is that in 1861 instead of forming the Territory of Colorado, execution of law formed more like a War Chest out of the gold claims here. However everybody trundles along, everybody but David Merrill anyway, thinking that there actually exists a State of Colorado here.

This leads me into thinking about "They" in the remedy. They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand...

In the biblical redemption model this "They" would be limited to Christians, and maybe in their own minds, the Jews too. [It might be that eternal salvation is just a state of mind so let's not leave the Jews out.]

Title 12 USC §411 is written for the God in all humanity. This appearance of God though shines through in the gold. Also in the IN GOD WE TRUST trust circulating through the bills and the Treasury by oaths of office being before God, So Help Me God etc.

Take the gold, foil it out thin, and wrap it around a wooden calf and you have an abomination. A distraction. I would like you to think of the gold as a lifeline into the land - the earth. From where it came. This cuts through the illusion of government as the trustee. The ownership is to the trustee but the use is to the beneficiary. Are you a beneficiary of the government - a fictional overlay between your feet and the ground? Or are you a beneficiary of the ground holding you up and providing living nutrition?

The demand for redemption of lawful money is coherently the demand to reinstate the natural order of things - that government be small and ready to help the beneficiaries in that trust. When you trust government there it is. When you act in honor, then government is not.

[allodial]

As in: we can stop (bind) or avoid the licensing of bondage to the illusion. We can license and permit (loose) good things. But perhaps we might do well to come to the realization that the public servant has had a hard time because of the failure to exercise power by those who may have not realized the power had been theirs to exercise all along?

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God.

I tend to agree with the notion that "Government" is not the trustee but instead the office holders are entrusted with Government whether it be for a Casino, for a Bank a State or for a Country Club--some kind of governance, order keeping, promotion of equity, keeping the Peace.

The breach of trust that created the opportunity for me is that in 1861 instead of forming the Territory of Colorado, execution of law formed more like a War Chest out of the gold claims here. However everybody trundles along, everybody but David Merrill anyway, thinking that there actually exists a State of Colorado here.

It came to me one day that the breeches of trust may have always been by design as invitations to the sons to "step up to the game". The Injured Sheep in the field that are moaning in pain might be earnestly calling out to the Son.

For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counseller, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. (not to be taken out of context but simply illustrative of the nature of the sonship)

Open to quite a remarkable interpretation.

For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God. For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope, Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. Romans 8:19-21

Maybe redemption has stories to tell
Maybe forgiveness is right where you fell
Where can you run to escape from yourself?
Where you gonna go?
Where you gonna go?
Salvation is here
(From lyrics of the song Dare You to Move, 2:38 mark in the video)