Our man in handcuffs is bringing in a lot of extraneous issues. First, why is he even in conversation with an Article I judge (administrator)? He needs to make a ministerial appearance only, under (e)8 of the First Judicial Act of 1789, state that the presentment in question is void for misnomer, show that he has properly Refused it for Cause, and then leave. Hanging around an Article I court, like talking to the police, will not benefit you in any way, it can only cause you greater grief.