Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Mountain Man Win - Judge Abandons Court

  1. #11
    Minor oversight - The judge also stated "you signed this document". They (courts) only see persons and if "mountain man" signed in blank, well then.

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by powder View Post
    Minor oversight - The judge also stated "you signed this document". They (courts) only see persons and if "mountain man" signed in blank, well then.
    Ah yes. As usual powder makes a most excellent point.
    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

  3. #13
    Years ago there was this Judge Judy TV show (still on i think) and there was this night club owner who was being sued.
    The man told Judge Judy that he was not the night club and the plaintiff got the wrong party because the plaintiff sent the letter (document) addressed to the night club and not the night club owner being him.
    Judge Judy asked him if he opened the letter that was addressed to the night club?
    He said yes.
    Judge Judy said there is no difference then your the night club.

    As ag manic posted earlier on this thread:
    The PERSON being comprised of a man that answers for, or is
    liable for that PERSON, and the corporate entity that IS that PERSON.

  4. #14
    Here is a man that challenges jurisdiction a proper way.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=OUSoH5ISco8

    Its to bad that they will always dismiss the case with some other technically to prevent case law precedent.

  5. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by walter View Post
    Here is a man that challenges jurisdiction a proper way.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=OUSoH5ISco8

    Its to bad that they will always dismiss the case with some other technically to prevent case law precedent.
    Actually, the proper way to challenge jurisdiction is on paper ONLY. There would be no video recording of that available on youtube or vimeo....

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by powder View Post
    Actually, the proper way to challenge jurisdiction is on paper ONLY. There would be no video recording of that available on youtube or vimeo....
    i agree with you there,

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by powder View Post
    Actually, the proper way to challenge jurisdiction is on paper ONLY. There would be no video recording of that available on youtube or vimeo....
    I too agree, bring in the news media for full coverage. A 2014 New Years resolution.
    Last edited by Chex; 12-31-13 at 05:24 PM.

  8. #18
    “defendant” includes a respondent to an application;

    I found that in Canada's copy write act.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •