Results 1 to 10 of 158

Thread: 1st Return Redeeming Lawful Money

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by froze25 View Post
    I agree with what you are saying but that kinda implies the existence of the Straw-man (that I believe to be true). In their own documents they list that as a flag for frivolous filings. In other words it may be too much truth for them. So I will stick to my letter that does rebut their proposal while still working towards resolution (not arguing).
    What would you expect them to say about it?

    Remember, they are willing to lie to you in order to get you into their Jurisdiction

    Like I said, hopefully others [like DM or MJ] will chime in

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by LearnTheLaw View Post
    What would you expect them to say about it?

    Remember, they are willing to lie to you in order to get you into their Jurisdiction

    Like I said, hopefully others [like DM or MJ] will chime in
    Bingo.

    And even though I'm just a lowly flea (apparently) in the forums, I will chime in and agree.

  3. #3

    Troy Lee

    Agreed, you MUST respond. Having seen multiple copies of this letter (thanks Pete/CTC), it's imperative you write, notarize, registered mail w receipt to Ogden. Once you receive the receipt, CALL and follow up w Odgen. Load Skype and an MP3 recorder that records automatically when a call is placed w Skype. Get names, ID #s, etc. Follow w another letter to the one you spoke with (again, notarize, registered mail w receipt) about your phone conversation. Even this may not be enough to stop a letter from Maureen Green, charging the penalty. However, you have a "name" to pursue if it becomes necessary. The key is stop the train before the ACS (Automated Collection System) kicks in.

    BTW, it's documented (by others) that the frivpen is actually a "User Fee" based on their own codes. Credit to "woody" on that one.

    Not Legal Advice, just my two bits...

  4. #4

    Important Rabbit Trail:

    Quote Originally Posted by stoneFree View Post
    This indicates David Merrill is dangerously correct and the malicious (banking) element has sent agents here to dissuade the public. Very encouraging! And the JohnnyCash example adds some weight with the matching "55" shown on the return.
    Group question, not so much directed to StoneFree:

    So how does one tell the difference between an "agent sent to dissuade" and an innocent student making comments or mistakes in their learning process?

    And I wonder how many innocent people have been driven away from these forums in the midst of their studies, never to return, all because some assumed them to be an agent based on their questions and learning process/learning style. This is tragic. Even shameful.

    What does it take for someone to prove they are not an agent?

    Does anyone take the time to pray over this forum daily? How about group prayer - is there a prayer team for this forum?

    Where is the fellowship?

    Does agape love exist in here? Because if this place is of the Father, agape love should be thriving in here.

    I have already invested many many study hours in these threads, hence my strong feelings on this subject. I have questions about what I’ve studied, yet I’m terrified to ask because of this very issue.

    Thank you for your consideration.

    Jeanne Marie

  5. #5
    Member froze25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    The Land that some call New York
    Posts
    71
    The letter has been mailed via certified return receipt. I will update as it progresses.

  6. #6
    It appears that people are making posts to this thread, however I seem to be having trouble seeing the posts.

    Am I the only one having this problem

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •