Consent to Service of Process

[Michael Joseph]

I claim IN THE NAME OF Yehoshuah full assurance in the Church of the Firstborn acknowledging my King and His Supremacy. I do not recognize those two women carrying the Ephah [false churches] and the three frogs of deception.

Zec 5:7 And, lo, there was lifted up a round disk, fitting the ephah like a lid: and this is a woman that sitteth in the midst of the ephah.

She is a whore - she is a false church - bent on dominion of mankind - but in the end she will give mankind anything his heart desires - even to the point of "ye are God". This is of course Theosophy 101 and in this writers opinion is a great abomination.

I claim in WITNESS to the greatness of my Husbandman. I am as Sampson, with locks regrown - I am returning to the goodness of my Husbandman - The Way - and in doing so I provide testimony to the Philistine world system. For out of the Lion [America] came Honey [the Word]. For Dan is a Lion's whelp. America has indeed been led astray but in the end - there is redemption in the True Messiah.

Let the injured party come forth to be judged under Torah! I sit in court to one day judge the angels. A great deception is coming and No Order of Angels or Powers or Dominions [Watchers] can persuade me that I am not loved by my Creator my Redeemer and my Savior.

Rom 8:38 For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,

Rom 8:39 Nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.


Isa 55:5 Behold, thou [Israel] shalt [be called] a nation that thou knowest not, and nations that knew not thee shall run unto thee because of Yehovah thy Elohim, and for the Holy One of Israel; for He hath glorified thee.

v. 5 of course is talking about America. Founded in duplicity. I am sure I am making many friends - yet the truth is just that - the truth. For sampson was beguiled many times, even to telling his great secret. Which was HE KEPT THE TORAH OF HIS ELOHIM. Now, currently his eyes have been poked out and he has heavy burdens placed upon his back.

Hos_2:7 And she shall eagerly follow after her lovers, but she shall not overtake them; and she shall seek them, but shall not find them: then shall she say, 'I will go and return to my first husband; for then was it better with me than [it is] now.'

Hos_6:1 "Come, and let us return unto the LORD: for He hath torn, and He will heal us; He hath smitten, and He will bind us up.

Shalom,
MJ

[Anthony Joseph]

a claim can only be made in living voice by man

one who makes said claim is fully liable for it

a false claim is one which is pursued with full knowledge that no harm or injury is done to a man - non-verifiable

a man can only harm another man

nothing in the 2nd dimension can be harmed

nothing in the second dimension can make a claim

common law is the supreme law of the land

common law requires that there must be a wrong of harm, injury or breach done by one man against another for a true and proper claim to exist

a man requires (demands by authority and by right) a proper claim brought in common law so he may settle and make restitution to the man aggrieved, if the claim be true

if no agreement can be made, the controversy will be heard and judged by a jury of 24 people who are God's representatives on earth

[Keith Alan]

The jury of 24... I keep finding it as 23 in America, the reason being that two complete juries can be found in one Grand jury of 24, with possibility of one jury reaching a different conclusion than the other.

[Anthony Joseph]

the number matters not; if one agrees to allow the matter to be judged in the public, the people (jury) decide who wins and the magistrate, being independent of the tribunal, bears witness and instructs the court clerk to seal and record the verdict.

that is how a common law court of record operates

[Keith Alan]

I thought it was interesting, seeing that the grand jury system is said to find its origin in the 25 free men of Magna Charta, and evolved into 23 in America.

[Keith Alan]

Getting back to the original topic, I find in the California Vehicle Code:

** 17450. As used in this chapter, “nonresident” means a person who is not a resident of this State at the time the accident or collision occurs.**

Okay, this is clear, except that for the moment, I'm assuming "this State" means the State of California.

** 17451. The acceptance by a nonresident of the rights and privileges conferred upon him by this code or any operation by himself or agent of a motor vehicle anywhere within this state, or in the event the nonresident is the owner of a motor vehicle then by the operation of the vehicle anywhere within this state by any person with his express or implied permission, is equivalent to an appointment by the nonresident of the director or his successor in office to be his true and lawful attorney upon whom may be served all lawful processes in any action or proceeding against the nonresident operator or nonresident owner growing out of any accident or collision resulting from the operation of any motor vehicle anywhere within this state by himself or agent, which appointment shall also be irrevocable and binding upon his executor or*administrator. **

This doesn't sound too bad to me, having an attorney on permanent retainer in matters growing out of accidents or collisions. What could some of the drawbacks be?

Edit -- Oh, and I noticed that in 17450 'State' is capitalized, but in 17451 'state' is not capitalized. Could this be significant?

[Freed Gerdes]

This vehicle code only applies to US citizens, residents within the federal districts that overlay the sovereign states. The states get their authority to issue such codes, and the authority to compel the US citizens to obey them, through the trust. By accepting the trust, you become a ward of the (federal) state, and they own you by holding title to your assets and by an implied security agreement for the debt. If you recover title to your estate and expatriate out of the US federal district, you become a state citizen, and none of these state codes apply to you. But if you have an accident, you would still have a duty to accept service from any injured party (the state cannot be an injured party - the state is imaginary). This is because there are two governments overlaying the same physical territory: the Constitutional Congress, and the sovereign state governments are constitutional republics. In their jurisdictions, you have constitutional rights, and common law applies; you don't need a driver's license. In the Federal Districts, which overlay the states, and are designated by two letter abbreviations and 5 digit zip codes, the democratic socialist government established by Congress in 1871 has jurisdiction. If your NAME has a domicile in Washington DC, such as it will if you signed up for Social Security and checked 'US citizen' on form SS-5, then you are 'subject to' the jurisdiction of the federal government, and all its legions of codes, rules, and regulations, even if you think you are a 'resident' of a state. The slightest violation of these endless rules will wind you up in an Article I court, which practices Lex Mercatoria, banker's law, based on contracts, and codified now in all state's laws as the Unified Commercial Code. Your trust NAME is in contract with the federal government, and you agreed to comply with all their municipal laws, however stupid they are, and also agreed to give up your Constitutional rights and be judged under the UCC in an unconstitutional court. The contract is vague and based on a lot of presumptions, but you must actively rebut those presumptions, starting early in the process, to have any chance of escape from the debt slavery trap that the federal regulations create. See this link: http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/

Freed

[froze25]

however stupid they are, and also agreed to give up your Constitutional rights and be judged under the UCC in an unconstitutional court. The contract is vague and based on a lot of presumptions, but you must actively rebut those presumptions, starting early in the process, to have any chance of escape from the debt slavery trap that the federal regulations create. See this link: http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/

Freed

I am on Chapter 5 now very interesting stuff that I have been exposed to before but this goes into much more detail and the sites are great. Very good stuff everyone could benefit from the information. Thank You Freed

[Anthony Joseph]

or... one can require that the claimant verify and prove whatever presumptions are put forth

don't try to prove a negative; let the claimant back up the presumptions with findings of fact and conclusions of law AFTER he/she bears full liability for said claim by speaking it in open court under oath or affirmation

[EZrhythm]

By accepting a driver's license, yes I would be agreeing. But if I don't have a license, I still think they would make the presumption in other ways. "Are you a US citizen? Are you a resident of the State of California?"

Never the less, I do see value in the process you are advocating. I am simply exploring another way, that's all. What if I have withdrawn consent? At that point they can't even talk to me. Yet there is still the problem of keeping my property in my custody (which I realize brings in yet another subject, my belief that I have a God granted usufruct in worldly possessions).

I've been thinking, and my goal would be to end up with some kind of plate or emblem being affixed to my car that the State would recognize.

Yes they will be looking for evidence/admission that one is a US CITIZEN / STATE OF... RESIDENT. I would dispose of or at the very least not be carrying any thing that could offer such evidence.

An emblem affixed to one's car that is desired to be recognized could be recorded in a public venue such as a county recorder or district court file. Although all such attempts will seem futile at the side of the road of one hasn't canceled/junked the STATE OF... Certificate of Title.