the point is that 'money' is whatever two people agree 'money' is by a meeting of the minds
if i paint a man's fence and said man hands me eggs, fruit and vegetables as per our prior agreement in exchange for my labor, then said eggs, fruit and vegetables is 'money' simply because we both agree these things are valuable
the other point is that we wish to avoid any liability by exchanging with paper currency
i believe i have a right to conduct my affairs without the scope of the Federal Reserve bank and districts; do you believe otherwise?
i believe i have a right to conduct my affairs upon the proper balances, and just weights and measures, of non-reserve, non-elastic public 'money' [cf. redeemed lawful money; see 12USC411]; do you believe otherwise?
who makes the claim i owe debt?
who will verify said debt is true?
who will verify said debt is [post] due?
upon verifiable proof of claim, under oath or affirmation, i am ready to settle any true debt i owe
who will now step forward, point to i; a man, and verify said claim of debt is true so i may settle the matter?
anyone?
anyone?
crickets
seems as though no controversy exists; have a blessed day, thank you and i will be on my way