Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: Quo Warranto

  1. #21
    One thing that is interesting about the document (Quo Warranto) is that the assertion of the "Constitution of the United States" having a "capstone" "Bill of Rights". It would seem that to the contrary the Constitution for the United States of America has a bill of rights and that the "Constitution of the United States" (as in "Arrangement/Makeup/Constellation of the United States" as a whole thing) is something more abstract and comprehensive or macroscopic than the 1788 charter.

    Lots of verbiage problems in the Quo Warranto document.

    "The prime directive ordained by the American People "
    Star Trek? Wut? The American People aren't the People of America.

    Re: Tim Turner.. I have long suspected he was part of an intelligence mill and sting operation. My observation is that he or those associated with him were analyzing lawful remedies and then sending out 'stooges' to make the remedies or those asserting them look bad. Such done by the Feds is IMHO felony conspiracy against rights and a a very nasty type of barratry or champerty.

    Re the Quo Warranto document it seems simpler to use a writ of mandamus on a rogue officer and appoint a higher official to deal with that rogue officer if he/she fails to get in line. Judges, like sheriffs, are peace officers too or at least some of them.

    The writ of mandamus is probably the most useful, universally available (even to subjects) of all of the prerogative or extraordinary writs. Writs of prohibition and orders to show cause are useful too.
    Last edited by allodial; 12-02-14 at 03:30 AM.
    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

  2. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by pumpkin View Post
    I have read some about Quo Warranto. It being a parogative writ, the right is not in its issue, but in its answer. The respondant must answer by what authority he acts. But as in all cases, the identity of the one who issues the writ will make all the difference in the world. Make sure to identify yourself as one of the people, created in the image of God, and endowed by your creator with certain inalienable rights. There are many entities other than people, and an answer that may fail concerning the rights of the people, will be sufficient if applied to another entity. Don't let the court or anyone else assume anything about you.
    Great point.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •