There is another Boris video uploaded to youtube Mar 3, 2014....subsequent & supplemental to the Adask/Boris interview on Feb 25....."The only way to win is surrender"
40 minutes -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFfDl6pMw1s#t=272
Sorry....I do not.
However, there are some web pages @ iamsomedude which may provide some clues
http://www.iamsomedude.com/legal.html
and
http://www.iamsomedude.com/advanced.html
Hi all! Please bear with me new and researching to do our first IBR's and 1040's. I am wondering if this can be accomplished without recording any UCC docs and encompass all needed in the endorsement alone. Here is what I am thinking so far...
Approved (date)
(proper name) and (proper name)
For full assignment and transfer of reversionary interest in equitable
title to property to and for the accounting of the United States
on behalf of (NAME) (SS #) and (NAME) (SS #)
Lawful money and full discharge is demanded for all transactions per 12 USC 411, 12 USC 95a(2), The Lieber
Code of 1863 article 31 and 38, and the 1907 Hague Convention article 43 and 55.
Or, am I way off base here?
I am also wondering if each year filing the 1040 in lawful money rebuts the presumption of using FRN's throughout that year or must it be demanded prior to with the banks and such?
Thank you,
Meredith
I've been studying Karl Lentz' common law approach. "It's so simple it's scary," as he says. lol
His stance is not to dapple at all in their codes, statutes, etc. as it's not man's language; instead, if someone says a man owes a debt, to write to that someone using his/her first name and ask him/her to tender the bill and sign it. This makes me wonder if using "USC" references is dappling?
Also, what is the difference between Accepted For Value and Indorsed Bill Remedy? A4V doesn't have the demand on it, but doesn't it accomplish the same thing? (Anyone?)
More Karl Lentz on YouTube, Trust In All Law. Talkshoe: My Private Audio (Angela Stark's call) and Unkommon Law (Karl's call); website
The IBR approach is untested. Proceed at your own risk. I have decided to NOT test this and am waiting to learn more from Boris. But your stamp version has merit and is worth discussing.
Watch the below Youtube 3/18/2014 video series by Boris on the “Usufruct Surrender” remedy to see how it fits with this “Indorsed Bill Remedy“:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs4C...SwZtpgzpEJny0v
Here is his related UCC-1. Click Document Number link at bottom of page.
Perhaps we should start another thread for Boris's approach. It would be good to discuss his ideas.
However, the 1040 has had successes as posted on this blog, and is independent of the IBR approach and does not need UCC filings.
Last edited by doug555; 04-24-14 at 10:47 PM.
Doug....I believe you meant to reference THIS UCC-1