Our ‘Military Rule’ Cause & Cure

[Keith Alan]

Who did this successfully? Proof Please.

I think your digging a hole for yourself with this man made law(s).

K.I.S.S.

I'm not sure what you mean. Who did what? I'm just trying to connect the dots. I'm trying to understand the totality of what is being proposed.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the information being presented, but it appears to me that the idea under discussion involves accepting the agency that was created when the State made the birth certificate.

By accepting he appointment as agent for the NAME (I don't know how this would be done, but assuming that it could be done ...), wouldn't this bring the man into agreement with the State, thus removing the controversy that is caused by claiming the NAME as his own?

And, my question about redeeming lawful money was simply thinking of loud, as it were.

[Chex]

And, my question about redeeming lawful money was simply thinking of loud, as it were.

It is Keith. Lawful money is simply thinking of loud, my comments were not pointed at you.

Like I said before the david clerance SCHROLL letter of instruction executor nation and patrick devine nonsense is too much to deal with. You want freedom better find another way, because you better know what and how to deal with it when it comes in your mailbox, been there done that.

Its like drilling gone wrong

A basic principle in United States' contract law is the theory that people have a right to contract. Being as such, entering into an agreement is very easy.

Contracts can be oral or written.

Depending on the contract, the agreement may need to be in writing. This is due to a concept called the Statute of Frauds.

These are general requirements to enter into an agreement.

Each individual state may have different requirements, but most state need these following requirements. Read more: http://www.ehow.com/how_6556100_ente...#ixzz2wFQ041Qu

Have a question? Get an answer from a lawyer now!