Usufruct Surrender Remedy

[Anthony Joseph]

I have no desire of "profit" or of anything which derives a "profit". As a son of the Most High, I do not endeavor for worldly "profits".

The 'Treasury' does not receive anything but what exists in the 2nd dimension DEAD world. The 'Treasury' does not sit in a chair, lay on a couch, sleep in a bed or steer a car; however, it makes a 'use' of the TITLE to these things by collateralization for the debt-based currency system. The things of God's creation are not surrendered to anyone or anything; only the fictitious TITLES and "profits" derived therefrom are surrendered since... why would we want such worldly DEAD things anyway? Is God interested in the DEAD paper world or any illusionary "profits" derived from it? If not, why should we be?

[Michael Joseph]

I have no desire of "profit" or of anything which derives a "profit". As a son of the Most High, I do not endeavor for worldly "profits".

The 'Treasury' does not receive anything but what exists in the 2nd dimension DEAD world. The 'Treasury' does not sit in a chair, lay on a couch, sleep in a bed or steer a car; however, it makes a 'use' of the TITLE to these things by collateralization for the debt-based currency system. The things of God's creation are not surrendered to anyone or anything; only the fictitious TITLES and "profits" derived therefrom are surrendered since... why would we want such worldly DEAD things anyway? Is God interested in the DEAD paper world or any illusionary "profits" derived from it? If not, why should we be?

okay lets do it like this. The big toe of the Flesh which I undertake within is part of that body. It is a member of the Person called Flesh. I say person because the Flesh is NOT me - I undertake in it. Now is it profitable to me to cut off the toe? Isn't that a WASTE of property that does not belong to me?

Gen 2:7 And Yehovah Elohim formed [as a potter] man [Adam] of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath that is life; and man became a living soul.

Now then, the potter formed the Flesh from His Creation!

Gen 1:1 Original Earth
*In the beginning Elohim [prepared, formed, fashioned, and] created the Heavens and the earth. [Perfect, complete and to be Inhabited].

Now certainly I make a use of this property belonging to God. Now the question remains HOW DO I USE IT? In the manner set forth by God or according to my own vain conceptions? Nothing of this flesh is my own!

It is a Thing and not me. I SHOULD Undertake in this Flesh according to the Laws set forth by the One who Created its Use and subjected the Use to certain Laws. Will you look at your arm and call it 2d? It is but a concoction of minerals and elements. You cannot sustain it in your own power [you cannot give it life]. You can only MAINTAIN it in accord with vanity or in accord with the True Owner's Law. Therefore you and I are servants, trustees undertaking in this Flesh.

You are looking at a mirror when you see the Worlds systems. And the District Attorney Satan accuses day and night - "see Father El Elyon, how can you let these into your Kingdom, they break your Law daily". And guess what Satan is RIGHT.

If you undertake in a Kingdom you are subject to the King's Law. The name cannot hold me - I am not this Flesh - it is a MIRROR image. Yehoshuah conquered the Dragon and set this maiden free. I am free in deed because I have a clear conscience.

Those who are hidden in Yehoshuah are Free and are not UNDER any Law. But those who have placed their Life in Trust with Yehoshuah desire to keep the King's Law to be pleasing as a wife desires to be pleasing to her husbandman.

2Co 11:2 For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chastevirgin to Christ.

Virgin: G3933

parthenos
par-then'-os
Of unknown origin; a maiden; by implication an unmarried daughter: - virgin.

======================================

Consider the analogy in Marriage. Have you engaged yourself in Marriage to another Law Giver? That is what Adam/Eve did. So what is new under the sun?

I am interested in Reaping Heavenly Profits by bringing the Harvest into the Barn. That is Turning [look it up] the hearts of the children back to The Creator instead of that of "a creator". Nevertheless all of the Earth and all things in it belong to The Creator and The Creator is able to grant to whomsoever He chooses. Those obedient children will inherit.

It is how living souls make a Use of the unrighteous mammon that God is interested.

Luk 16:11 If therefore ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who will commit to your trust the true riches?

Luk 16:12 And if ye have not been faithful in that which is another man's, who shall give you that which is your own?

This is God speaking - he is saying PROVE yourself trustworthy. Then we can talk. I love that God is from the Show Me state!

Shalom,
MJ

[Moxie]

Hey, I'm not reaching for any dimes! LOL

Just trying to sift out what was being explained in those lengthy uToobs. Waaay too many back handsprings and cartwheels, not enough point-making.

[Anthony Joseph]

'king' is still lower than man. God did not create 'king' in his image.

[allodial]

'king' is still lower than man. God did not create 'king' in his image.

Except that per Black's Law Dictionary 'man' could be construed to refer to a 'vassal' as contrasted with "Man" or "Mankind". Statutory/official vs. organic or popular English?



Note: "a person of the male sex".



Note the word "dominion" which is associated with sovereignty.





(Scans from Blacks 2nd Edition.)

[Michael Joseph]

'king' is still lower than man. God did not create 'king' in his image.

Is God subject to vanity? No. Therefore man in his current Status is NOT in the image of God. God did create the office of the King. But man wanted to see his fellow undertaking in it. There we go again back to those Five Philistine Lords [senses].

El Elyon = Emperor
Yehovah = King
El Shaddai = Queen
Yehovah occupies in many offices : As King, as Savior [Yehoshuah] as Sustainer, as Provider, etc.

[Anthony Joseph]

Is God subject to vanity? No. Therefore man in his current Status is NOT in the image of God. God did create the office of the King. But man wanted to see his fellow undertaking in it. There we go again back to those Five Philistine Lords [senses].

El Elyon = Emperor
Yehovah = King
El Shaddai = Queen
Yehovah occupies in many offices : As King, as Savior [Yehoshuah] as Sustainer, as Provider, etc.

I do not agree with your take on "image of God".

Second, any man who enters into an office of 'king' is still lower than man; how can an 'office' be higher than the living man who exercises said office?

[Michael Joseph]

I do not agree with your take on "image of God".

Second, any man who enters into an office of 'king' is still lower than man; how can an 'office' be higher than the living man who exercises said office?

the term Office means Duty. So what is the proper office? Is it not to render duty to God, his Creator?

If men join together and appoint themselves a king - they by their choice - elevate another man over them. Man made the choice to put another man as King in Trust. Therefore man in society is subject to their king.

That's like saying I make a choice and then saying I am not subject to my choice because I am a man. I declare status apart from being a man. I declare status as a living soul in Christ. My status is in Christ. My trust is in my King. My choice, therefore my obligation.


Shalom,
Michael Joseph

[Michael Joseph]

I have been careful to couch my discourse in Legal Terms. Because the topic is that of a Legal nature. Therefore Use in a legal sense does not hold the same meaning in a common sense. That would be committing adultery. This goes to how the argument is framed.

So an OFFICE[r] has certain duties with respect to the Law Boundary - Societal Trust. So let me frame it like this.

Lets say I claim the flesh body I reside in is mine. That is a tort because it isn't. I did not create it and I only maintain it. Now I have been granted the right to use this property - but only in accord with the Laws governing the Use. If I use it against those laws - then there are consequences. So regarding Bouvier :

USUFRUCT The right of enjoying a thing, the property of which is vested in another, and to draw from the same all the profit, utility and advantage which it may produce, provided it be without altering the substance of the thing.

Now clearly the Property is in God. So what does Enjoy mean?

ENJOYMENT. The right which a man possesses of receiving all the product of a thing for his necessity, his use, or his pleasure.

Now then considering the flesh body how will I return the Usufruct of that body to God absent death? I am bound to make a use of it to maintain it according to Leviticus 11 [health laws]. The One who created the Thing [Flesh] subjected the Use of the Thing to Law.

How then will I give what I do not have to give? What I can however do is to make the Use of the Thing according to the Law which governs the Thing.

Now the question is who sustains the flesh? Is it my vain conceptions of my own deeds? Or do I place my Trust in God. In other words am I eating from the Tree of the knowledge of good and evil or the Tree of Life? A choice?

Framing as hereinbefore, I can see how one might surrender his rights to the use of the thing [Life] according to the following:


Heb 10:9 Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.

Which is to say a man losing his life in Christ. That would indeed be a Surrender of the Usufruct - which hinges on the term Enjoyment. Placing my trust in Yehovah Yireh. He sustains my life. Interesting paradox.

Mat 4:4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.

Undertaking according to the Tree of the knowledge of good and evil - my senses Rule me. But in the Tree of Life the Holy Spirit has the Rule.

Shalom,
Michael Joseph

[Anthony Joseph]

God does not refer to 'Black's Law Dictionary'; God's man predates Black.