I presume the Reader will look closely enough at the attached Rejection to be encouraged rather than discouraged. Firstly notice that the original Libel of Review has been against a local court clerk (public trustee) determined in collusion with a mortgage company. Now it would seem that the judge is in collusion with the mortgage company! Furthermore, the clerk is afraid of the judge enough to break the rule, a little bit.
Next notice how the judge has ordered the suitor to refrain from filing his R4C's into the Closed Case. However the suitor continually goes to the courthouse and gets the papers marked FILED. So all that is happening is the clerk of court is being manipulated by the federal judge into not docketing the Filings and therefore not publishing the R4C's on PACER. In other words the suitor just needs to find a publication method for his FILED R4C's.
NOTICE: RECAP it turns out is not free. It loads to "Public Archives" and is free from there but PACER charges for the initial download!
Pay attention to a feature you can load up on your browser called RECAP - PACER backwards. This is where a clever attorney figured out that the US Government cannot legally profit from making public notice of the activities in the federal courts. So factor that in please. The judge is tampering with the US Government's publication service - tampering with an (electronic) witness.
The next step?
I think this suitor should gather all his rejected R4C's and open a Criminal Complaint in a neighboring state or Washington DC USDC for $46 and start the record for this judge's, and clerk's removal and maybe prosecution. I would be happy to see that happen!
Regards,
David Merrill.
Last edited by David Merrill; 07-06-14 at 12:02 AM.
Reply With Quote