Canadian action - response from CRA

[motla68]

Another action from the Canadian study group related to Coresource methodology, please refer to the following STS forum thread for background related information in post#1:
http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...ber-we-helped.

( See attachments )

[David Merrill]

That is a great example of process-to-results again. Thank you!! It is not concluded though, as they say, they retain the right to process or re-assess the fellow for tax year 2007 and may have done that. But because of components I recognize in the USA related to the diversity of the 'saving to suitors' clause of 1789 - the namesake of this Website, they likely billed or deducted the 2007 Withholdings ($4,976.45) from 2008, 2009 or 2010 Refunds. But I have to say that your exhibits start to demonstrate what I have been saying about the alleged birth certificate hypothecation/account; that there is nothing there of value, only registration and an honest account for the TRUST.

Like this incorrect model.

It is delightful to see the components of redeeming lawful money translated into Canadian banking law - The Bank of Canada Act. Funny how for the size of that book though - you find the redemption of lawful money on demand in the last paragraph only!



The proper identity is there; First Middle of the Last family. However he accepts the fiduciary responsibility fully on the signature line by signing with a legal or full name and admitting to be creditor for the CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST!

Therefore the Refund check is just to be safe about Paul's threat of prosecution while they retain their right to assess him for 2007 as they wish. Looking at the Demand we see that is for 2007 even though it is late in the year so we can presume that the amount $4,976.45 is the Withholdings over the tax year 2007.

To make the process stick Paul would need to be non-endorsing his paychecks according to the Bank of Canada Act so not to be putting that same fiduciary signature as the surety bond for the fractional lending on the Canadian (elastic) currency.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[motla68]

Additional information found:

Lawful Money of Canada means the same as Lawful Money of the United States, how tied in:

Vancouver Charter Sect. 236
http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bcl...eside/vanch_06

One following document stated:

(e) “lawful money of Canada” means:
(i) coins with a face value of two dollars or less that are current within
the meaning of the Currency and Exchange Act (Canada), as amended
from to time; and
(ii) Bank of Canada notes issued pursuant to the Bank of Canada Act,
as amended from time to time.
3 Jan 86 cC-45.1 Reg 1 s2.
Source: Saskatchawan Credit Union Regulations

[David Merrill]

Thank you again;

That certainly sounds as though, short of a definition within that act, that the Parliament in Canada is deferring to the US Congress to define lawful money for Canada.

The debentures issued therefor may be made payable at such places, within or without Canada, and in such currencies, whether of Canada or some other country, as the Council deems expedient, and if the debentures are, or have been, made payable in lawful money of the United States of America, a dollar so payable shall, for the purpose of such calculation or of any other calculation directed towards ascertaining whether or not any proposed borrowing is within the power of Council, be deemed to be the equivalent of a dollar payable in lawful money of Canada.

Described by the courts:

In the exercise of that power Congress has declared that Federal Reserve Notes are legal tender and are redeemable in lawful money.

and

United States notes shall be lawful money, and a legal tender in payment of all debts, public and private, within the United States, except for duties on imports and interest on the public debt.

[allodial]

Merhaps there is a system of "social credit" set up and few realize it?

[David Merrill]

I had forgotten about this thread, I suppose because Motla68 had related it to what he calls CoreSouce. Some of the visitors lately should get a look though, as they are living in Canada.

I have the images on Google Docs too.