Quote Originally Posted by doug555 View Post
This is why I suggest this indorsement.

BACK OF PRESENTMENT, 90-DEGREE ANGLE, HAND-PRINTED, BLUE INK:

For Deposit Only
to the account of
United States
12 USC 342

John Henry Doe



This DEPOSIT is the next step... but all of the follow-up documents need to be in place first... based on research in this folder about "Confusio - Merger - Extinguishment - Discharge"

And about "indorser's recourse" in this book.

Notice that all "statements" demand "payment".

Why are we then tendering "promises of payment" known as FRNs?
The Money In Your Bank Account Was Stolen This Morning!

Perhaps FRNs and checkbook money will soon not circulate AS MONEY given the report at the above link.

This is exactly why the Indorsed Bill Remedy is needed ASAP!

In conjunction with the Usufruct Remedy

If so, then the only thing left in circulation AS MONEY will be just the BILLS themselves.

Why not just indorse, return and enforce them as the negotiable instruments that they truly are?!

If dishonored, resurrect McFadden's 1933 charges lodged in the Judiciary.

David, would you know how to get a certified copy of those documents?