Further proof from a state senator that all driving "licenses" are contractual scams!

[KnowLaw]

Very astute observation ! Yes they are masters of deflection & obfuscation.

With statists and attorneys, the devil is always in the details.

Watch what they say and see if it squares up with the question you asked. It rarely, if ever, will. Nevertheless, you have to stay within your court of competent jurisdiction if you wish to successfully rebut their subterfuge and discredit their claim or allegation.

It is all about whose perception is going to prevail. If they can sway your perception of reality over to theirs, they will. And once they do, they will have obtained your consent. That's really all they are after is your consent. And you have to be ever vigilant not to provide it to them.

[loveunderlaw]

With statists and attorneys, the devil is always in the details.

Watch what they say and see if it squares up with the question you asked. It rarely, if ever, will. Nevertheless, you have to stay within your court of competent jurisdiction if you wish to successfully rebut their subterfuge and discredit their claim or allegation.

It is all about whose perception is going to prevail. If they can sway your perception of reality over to theirs, they will. And once they do, they will have obtained your consent. That's really all they are after is your consent. And you have to be ever vigilant not to provide it to them.

Yes I agree, also ordinary people should ask them to put the proceedings in plain English. That way there's an additional level of protection, so many of these Justices, Judges, Magistrates, etc... love to obscure what they're doing with Legalese garbage. A copy of Black's Law Dictionary or Bouvier's should be on everyone's wish list if they don't already have a copy handy. It's totally within your rights to look up definitions right in "court" from a law dictionary to help rebut their unlawful claims against you !