Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: 12USC411 does not exist.

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    12USC411 does not exist.

    We had an opportunity to meet with Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP partner Kirk A. Pinkerton

    Mr. Pinkerton
    has substantial experience in both federal and state tax matters, corporate law, health care law, employee benefits and business litigation. He has implemented stock and asset sales, acquisitions and mergers of client businesses.

    Pinkerton said there is no “lawful money” there is only income.

    We showed the “lawful money” stamp on the bill , Pinkerton said it doesn’t matter its income "You have to pay the tax."

    I forgot to mention he said we were "tax protesters."

    David Lee "Dave" Camp won’t entertain it. Visclosky said take it to tax court and let a judge "interpret" the law.

    Judicial Watch Thomas Fitton – President, Paul Orfanedes – Director of Litigation, Board of Directors Secretary & Treasurer, Chris Farrell – Director of Research and Investigation, Geoff Lyon won’t address it.

    The Institute for Justice Institute President Chip Mellor won’t address it, the speakers won’t address it, but you can donate

    Because they all work for her

    The only way you can get lawful money is if a judge "interprets" in your favor doesn't matter what The United States Code is the codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States. It is divided by broad subjects into 51 titles has to say. even if Congress writes the laws, the Executive carries them out, and the Judiciary decides controversies that arise under those laws between real people or institutions with something genuine in dispute.

    Lyle Denniston, the National Constitution Center’s adviser on constitutional literacy, looks at how the upcoming Obamacare case in the Supreme Court is a classic one of interpreting statutes. http://news.yahoo.com/constitution-c...-politics.html "The Constitution, however, provides no guidance to the federal courts on the right way, or wrong way, to read a statute.

    But there is a constitutional principle that is very much at work when a court sets out to interpret a law; it is the structural concept of separation of powers."

    http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...2142#post12142
    Last edited by Chex; 11-11-14 at 09:17 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •