"Lawful Money" definition? attn:David

[David Merrill]

hi,

Im still struggling with the very basics.. actually Ive given up on this (several times) but something always leads me back.

David, if you would.. can I please get your definition of "Lawful Money"? at this time I am not interested in anyone else s so to others, I ask that please refrain until (if) David responds with his definition.

I have other questions (zillions) but they all hinge on this one. and yes Ive tried this before with different words on other threads but maybe this time is different?

also, Im not upto no good as I see some of you here seem to think of other members like that. not too stupid or mentally disabled either, just have a somewhat mechanical logic process. I think I already know the answer but I need it confirmed by The Man himself!

thanks

I suppose that the ritual magick is to blame you for not getting it because your hair is wrong and you have too much weight on your left foot... - it's all in how you hold your tongue.

Let's imagine though that the reason you keep getting back here is that you desire the Truth.

For twenty-five years now I have enjoyed the access to a repository of archives and records here. So my definition for "lawful money" is only what Congress and the courts feel is the definition. Congress apparently wont define lawful money further than what you find in the Federal Reserve Act. The courts describe what the Federal Reserve Act defines it as...

To summarize though, Federal Reserve notes are redeemable in gold. Gold has been replaced in the terminology by lawful money. Therefore gold is lawful money. The gold seizure depended on the Emergency - which activated the Trading with the Enemy Act against the people, the citizenry of endorsers. That emergency ended in and around 1976 but left provisions that when the Federal Reserve is no longer desired (endorsed) there will be another Bankers' Holiday and the Amendments to the Bretton Woods Act stipulate that international gold that will go back into the system will do so at $42.22/troy ounce.

Therefore the only thing extending the Emergency is conditioning (between your ears).

A lot of people get that. Some naturally; for example James Roland built this castle, so you would not expect him to be fluent about money and law.

DONATE HERE - The Tabernacle for the Redemption of God's Lawful Money!


So what you are after lacks definition only because Congress is in breach of trust. The Constitution entrusted Congress with authority to regulate the value of money. Congress entrusted the Federal Reserve as the US central bank in 1913 and the Fed has since run the value of the US dollar into the ground. That leaves the resulting trust open for the trustee to become the beneficiary.

And the bookkeeper can be king if the public is kept in ignorance of the methodology of the bookkeeping. All science is a means to an end.

The means is knowledge. The end is control. Therefore the only issue remaining is who will be the beneficiary.

I am quoting from memory - Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars by Hartford VAN DYKE.