Page 14 of 14 FirstFirst ... 4121314
Results 131 to 136 of 136

Thread: Get Your Billions Back, America: 2014

  1. #131
    Follow up to my 7/19/17 post...

    I R4C’d the 3176C letter, posted the timely response in my evidence file w the USDC, all has been quiet. I check mail today, and a CP15 letter is in the mail, assessing a penalty of $5000 for a frivolous return, dated 10/9/2017.

    I didn’t go beyond R4Cing the 3176C letter. I believe David M mentioned “garnishment” of executive salaries after my 7/19 post, but I failed to see that as an option in my case. Since I provided evidence of RLM w my 2016 return, I’m not sure it will be effective. I believe my course of action is to R4C this presentment, along with the Lawful Money demand evidence (which is noted at my bank and my employer on the W4). I know the LM redemption is right, always have. How have you all responded that was effective? I still have the documentation from the “user fee” coding from before, proving one reason (of many)LM redemption works.

    Having been through this pre RLM, which didn’t end well, I’m open to any council that is offered. Thoughts?
    Last edited by fano24chevy; 10-08-17 at 07:37 PM.

  2. #132
    Quote Originally Posted by fano24chevy View Post
    Follow up to my 7/19/17 post...

    I R4C’d the 3176C letter, posted the timely response in my evidence file w the USDC, all has been quiet. I check mail today, and a CP15 letter is in the mail, assessing a penalty of $5000 for a frivolous return, dated 10/9/2017.

    I didn’t go beyond R4Cing the 3176C letter. I believe David M mentioned “garnishment” of executive salaries after my 7/19 post, but I failed to see that as an option in my case. Since I provided evidence of RLM w my 2016 return, I’m not sure it will be effective. I believe my course of action is to R4C this presentment, along with the Lawful Money demand evidence (which is noted at my bank and my employer on the W4). I know the LM redemption is right, always have. How have you all responded that was effective? I still have the documentation from the “user fee” coding from before, proving one reason (of many)LM redemption works.

    Having been through this pre RLM, which didn’t end well, I’m open to any council that is offered. Thoughts?
    I see your R4C on the 3176C from July. That was clean process.

    Contemplate garnishment on the Secretary under Rule B(1)(c) with this R4C on the FrivPen bill. I will help you.

  3. #133

    Template Garnishment

    I strongly suggest that you pay me for my Lesson Plan and not to try making this fly without my experience. I have attached a Template. This is right on the knife-edge October of 2017. The big improvement is this is now in the venue of the Defendant/Respondent.

    Here is the Rule.

    Rule B(1)(c) If the plaintiff or the plaintiff's attorney certifies that exigent circumstances make court review impracticable, the clerk must issue the summons and process of attachment and garnishment. The plaintiff has the burden in any post-attachment hearing under Rule E(4)(f) to show that exigent circumstances existed.
    The two oaths are Refused for Cause in the same style that cause this federal "judge" to redact his signature and DoB from his own oath before the clerk posted it on PACER!! Circle the altered sentence, the CODE, and write "NO!!" And of course stamp the bills on the backside or write your Demand.

    Name:  Oath Signature Redacted by BURGESS R4C.jpg
Views: 158
Size:  440.6 KB
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by David Merrill; 10-08-17 at 11:44 PM.

  4. #134
    Thank you David! I have just emailed my particulars within the template to you. I will work on the balance of the documents we discussed tomorrow

  5. #135
    Quote Originally Posted by enlightened View Post
    I'd love to see the verbiage used in response to your 3176C letter.

    Here's some "verbiage" to ponder -- from StSC member 'martin earl'. He redeemed the three 3176C's on the following year's return.....an extra 15k removed from the Nat'l Debt !!

    http://savingtosuitorsclub.net/showt...ll=1#post20394

  6. #136
    Thank you ag maniac! I will indeed ponder the verbiage for potential utilization...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •