Hi Johnny;
Welcome to StSC!
I was just looking at a FrivPen warning and got an updated Link to
the same old Memorandum as recently cited. So I really don't spend much time on this thread.
I get a lot of successful reports though. Just the other day...
He sanitized them for use but I refrain from putting them on the forums because of a NY Tort Attorney who likes to publish the PACER docs on a skeptical website thinking he is affecting process. Since the purpose is to publish process there is no real problem but I don't like to see suitors' home addresses displayed to that mentality for ridicule.
The good news however is that your metaphysics is what is really at work. There is a
new example here, with documentation. This suitor never filed a Libel of Review to establish an evidence repository and may have encouraged the IRS agent to start FrivPen process. So he will likely re-file a more standard 1040 Form, set up an evidence repository and file the Redeemed Lawful Money Return next year instead. Once they get that ball rolling they would rather get the suitor into an administrative argument, just creating a sad FrivPen, ignoring the law.
Lots of folks are getting full refunds on the evidence alone, the demands on the backsides of paychecks etc. but I am skeptical about going forward without a proper evidence repository (record).
Regards,
David Merrill.