Results 1 to 10 of 258

Thread: Exactly what does the IRS agent think?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Another common citation for the 3176 styled Letter is 2105. I do not see any new details that might cover redemption.

    Prepping Crown indictment I discovered an interesting IRS publication:

    https://www.irs.gov/irm/part25/irm_25-025-010r

    Search for "chargeback" -

    Exhibit 25.25.10-1

    Frivolous Arguments

    Frivolous arguments are currently described in Notice 2010-33, available at http://www.irs.gov/irb/2010-17_IRB/ar13.html (or its successor notice), the Truth About Frivolous Arguments, and a number of revenue rulings. Please refer to these publications for the most current listing of frivolous arguments. Recognized frivolous arguments include but are not limited to:


    Non-negotiable Chargeback (NNCB) - The filer attempts to sell his/her birthright back to the government for a large dollar amount and requests that a "Treasury Direct Account" be set up to hold the money.
    Interestingly this is a distorted description of redemption - redeemed from a world where debt is valued for substance, along with an absurdity that debt can be sustainable. Even clearly in the Bible the Law is Jubilee every 50 years.

    In a phone call to the IRS recently a suitor was told that "Non-Negotiable Chargeback" was the FribPen category that Redeemed Lawful Money Returns fell under for charging FrivPen.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by David Merrill; 12-04-19 at 08:53 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •