If you go to the beginning of the thread though, we get the 'memorandum' that went out (policy) that Florida police are being trained to completely ignore any verbiage going down about,
I am not using this card to identify myself. It is even possible that Florida is waiting on Colorado's
New Cash Cow before trying it on AJ, maybe not. Even though AJ may be keeping a current insurance policy on his motor vehicle, he might get charged for no insurance coverage on the same legal opinion, that even though he is offering Proof of Insurance he will be charged with No Proof of Insurance - like another suitor was. This is just amazing how these things come together synchronous in the brain trust and makes me aware that they have their internal memorandums and email lists too.
The approach is that the driver license card is bail for $250. Regardless of name. They may not pursue failure to appear (in Colorado they typically jail for FTA and drop that once bail out of your pocket has been arrainged (arranged). One non-suitor I spoke with challenged jurisdiction on a speeding charge. The judge had a Warrant mailed to him. He went in to inquire about that and was arrested and would have gone to jail except somebody came in and wrote a check - they would not accept cash! - Even if he had the $250 in his pocket lawful money, they would not have accepted that cash.
So Cheryl LOESCH the US clerk of court there in Florida, has formed the ANTHONY JOSEPH for Anthony Joseph's use. Just as when I
paid for the transcripts in lawful money chief judge SAMELSON arranged the same trust for my use,
the DAVID MERRILL. I appreciate that - that will be the NAME ON ACCOUNT for settling the $20M lien. Hopefully AJ will handle himself accordingly and remain Anthony Joseph for the duration of the trial to come because misnomer abates pleadings - he has never been arraigned. However the next police officer will notice that AJ has not paid up bail for the infraction and its off to jail for booking (think about that - setting an appointment for a Show to be Heard) where the judge will verify that AJ does not hold value (A4V) in the driver license card of $250 and set some higher amount of bail in cash out of AJ's pocket...
But the Booking Department at the jail has already gotten the Memo!
They will only accept a check. So whoever comes and pays it better put in the Memo line, a new Memo -
Paid Lawful Money Pursuant to Title 12 U.S.C. §411 and wait four hours while they decide if they will accept it or can coerce AJ's wife, sitting in the hard plastic chairs in the jail waiting area, to write a new check with the case number only in the Memo line.
Memorandums are Notice. Meanwhile she gets to visit with AJ through a Plexiglas window or two-way camera screen, between shivering concrete box-naps hoping AJ will authorize her to set up the ANTHONY JOSEPH SURNAME trust. If AJ holds out until trial, then he can cross examine the prosecution's witness - Adversary Witness for the Defense - and hopefully the officer will come clean that AJ did not use the driver license card, in either infraction, the earlier one FTA or the next one, to identify himself. During the pre-trial negotiations (settlement of bail) AJ can notify the court of his charges for the court proceeding against his abatement for misnomer and start liening on his actor charges - after all, Jack NICHOLSON does it for allowing those PARAMOUNT makup artists to violate and assassinate his character - painting up his face and showing everybody what a JOKER Jack really is - to the Notice such a tort against the real Jack will cost only $36M per movie...
Then comes the Past Due Notice, then the lien...
That's about it. I can share with you my first hand experiences with a greater confidence than advise somebody to
Certify the Charges, or
Certify the Statute. Both of these come from suitors who are very organized with their computers. If you have a good memory you know what I mean because you know which suitor mentioned Certify the Charges and which one mentioned Certify the Statute - have the other suitor do this... Certify the Blank. My point being that somebody mentioned that it has worked every time, on the Internet, and these two suitors tucked that email away in a directory where they could find it later. My posture is that makes it one level of hearsay above complete Internet Yarn. In other words, when somebody is intelligent enough to make
Certify the Blank work, I would hope they are intelligent enough to keep a copy of the citation or get it from the Records Department at the courthouse along with ordering up the Transcript and Register of Action where it worked, and to sanitize their personal information and prepare some kind of convincing evidence package so that I do not have to dismiss two intelligent suitors like they are clowns who believe anything they hear. I know neither one of them are clowns. But I cannot in good conscience pass this on or try it in actuality on the other suitor if I do not understand it myself. If one of you wants to add that verbiage and/or explain it carefully there we go. One suggestion that may go over is the other suitor is arranging a meeting for all of us with the suitor who suggests Certify the Charges doctrine, as we are all local - an advantage of the brain trust. Maybe something will come of it? If we sit down and we understand it, or the suitor shows me evidence like I suggest, then we might risk adding it in.
This whole issue about Gifting the Name to an Attorney is in constant interplay. Even Dating a document! Dating is again Gifting and so I have been leaving that to the clerk (postal clerk too) or notary - to add the Gifting to the documentation. That makes me the conduit between heaven and earth, as I understand the teachings of yet another suitor around here. The State is trustee but I can make that trustee behave legally as far as correcting misnomer.