It might be that a lot of folks have a problem believing and coming to terms with the reality of there being a group of disturbers in most every important social organism who have the purpose of creating and promoting strife, division, turmoil, death, bloodshed, etc. There are many good cops. The Michael Brown case and others like it were probably specifically designed and carried out to have a destabilizing effect.
The PYSOPs purveyors are even putting cops in the cross fire. Sheriff Clarke is probably aware of it. It is likely worth noting that Clarke has been part of the Constitutional sheriffs movement which seems to be a very important in safeguarding the States from becoming over-run by Neo-Nazi Federalized liberal extremism. Many cops have been coming out saying that they got into their jobs for one reason and them find out that they are being used to raise money even if through unlawful means.
Sheriff Clarke's statements might be best viewed with realization of the attacks that have been made against sheriffs. Sheriffs are not "police" in the typical sense. Sheriffs are like Attorneys General but for a specific county. One duty of a sheriff is to protect a county from invasion. Regular police, typically peace officers first, however, tend to be employees of municipal corporations employed to enforce municipal policies/codes.Wicomico County Sheriff Mike Lewis made national headlines in September after telling a local news station, "As long as I'm the sheriff in this county, I will not allow the federal government to come in here and strip my citizens of their right to bear arms. I can tell you this, if they attempt to do that, it would be an all-out civil war, no question about it."(Source: Media Matters for America article - Oct. 9, 2014)
If one studies the undermining of sheriffs departments in the USA over the past twenty years, Sheriff Clarke's stance might come into better clarity. The U.S. Attorney General is also supposed to protect the USA against invasion and against subversion--if an AG ignores subversive legislation or activity he isn't doing his job. It seems that one way or another Sheriff Clarke is making a point about that.
We have people banning gay marriage which it was never in the power of any Queen or King of England to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple and yet while the same attorneys general got voted into office by the same people, they ignore the people's choices on the basis of a case were a judge said marriage has nothing to do with "sexual intercourse" but yet the same attorneys general take that same case as an excuse to allow anal sex literature to be passed out to 6th graders? (IF MARRIAGE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SEXUAL INTERCOURSE THEN WHY ARE USING THAT CASE AS AN EXCUSE TO IGNORE LAWS AGAINST PASSING OUT ANAL SEX PORN TO LITTLE KIDS ?) Even if one doesn't care about the underlying matter, the trend of total disregard for the laws on the books should be of concern.
And they claim that laws against "interracial marriage" to be on the same level as laws against homosexual marriage. While it might be true that the States never had an organic right in law to stop a man and a maiden Christians from marrying (under the right circumstances), it is true that a citizen never had the right to engage in practices which promote disease (AFAIK not even 'straight people' have that right). Unlike the God-given or inherent rights of "Blacks", the alleged 'gay 'rights' never were. The rights of "Blacks" were rights that always were but were being conspired against--two different things.
Joe Arapaio is actually doing his job.
Most people don't hear much about sheriffs because of the usurp-ative move to undermine and underfund sheriffs that has been going on since probably the 80s--they know sheriffs have a lot of power and they are responsible for protecting the county from invasion, usurpers, unconstitutional activities, etc. People look at Sheriff Arapaio and think he's nutty or out of place: IT IS HIS JOB to stop even the Feds from pulling a fast one on his county.
Hollywood has been in on the gambit because they have been clever to give the impression of sheriffs being a think of the past..Wild Wild West. Believe it or not, there was this actor who became President of the United States who was a key player in passing legislation to internationalize and federalize law enforcement.
Related:The modern office of sheriff in the United States descends from a one-thousand-year-old English tradition: a "shire-reeve" (shire-keeper) is the oldest appointment of the English crown. Because county governments were typically the first established units of government in newly settled American territories, sheriffs were among the first elected public officials in an area and thus developed a leading role in local law enforcement.
A dichotomy frequently exists today between a sheriff's jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of a local police department. A metropolitan area may encompass an entire county or more; police departments and sheriffs will often maintain concurrent jurisdiction in the overlapping area. A sheriff may assume {should read 'presume'} that a local police department will do its duty in enforcing the law, but the primary obligation rests with the sheriff and requires him to act when evidence of neglect of that duty exists.(Source: definition of Shire-Reve - http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/)
Reply With Quote