Results 1 to 10 of 73

Thread: I received a 3176C 'frivolous letter' for 2013 1040x Amended return with LM demand

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I got his phone number and called him yesterday. He was polite but had a tone of resignation in his voice and simply told me he doesn't do that anymore.

    More to my point. I need to find a template for making sure my complaint to District Court is correct enough so that it is not rejected for subject matter jurisdiction or failure to state a claim.

    Internet searches give me hope I am doing it correctly, but would seriously want to see an actual complaint regarding Schlabach and hopefully finding they won. Does anyone know of such a case. FrivPen case like Schlabach would be great but I'll tack any IRS litigation. Especially if they won.

  2. #2
    Just found another roadblock Form SF95-07a-1 Claim for Damages form.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by David Neil View Post
    I got his phone number and called him yesterday. He was polite but had a tone of resignation in his voice and simply told me he doesn't do that anymore.

    More to my point. I need to find a template for making sure my complaint to District Court is correct enough so that it is not rejected for subject matter jurisdiction or failure to state a claim.

    Internet searches give me hope I am doing it correctly, but would seriously want to see an actual complaint regarding Schlabach and hopefully finding they won. Does anyone know of such a case. FrivPen case like Schlabach would be great but I'll tack any IRS litigation. Especially if they won.
    Hello,

    Yes; I have all the important filings in the SCHLABACH matter. I call it the MENDOZA Opinion. At Doc 6, when MENDOZA began obfuscating justice I told John to Refuse for Cause his oath of office and disqualify him.

    Name:  Oath of Office SCHLABACH USDC WA_Page_3.jpg
Views: 184
Size:  193.8 KB

    Like all the federal "judges" MENDOZA has signed a deviant oath - SO HELP ME GOD. Rather than the prescribed, So help me God.

    I was helping SCHLABACH out without charge but he did not get it. Or like some suspect he was intending to appeal and generate bad case law about remedy (barratry) all along. Since he would not pay for my Lesson Plan I never really gave the matter much thought. I did take time to download the important documents but have never spent much time reading them.

    I have seen this happen several times where one needs to pay up before they will pay attention. If John had R4C's MENDOZA for falsification and fraud, then I would have kept helping out but John started blaming me when things went south for him. He even threatened to sue me for not making him R4C MENDOZA? Something like that. Nonsense.

    Enjoy! But be very careful. I have never looked close for mines of thought. You might be severely misled by what looks real. My Lesson Plan keeps things simple.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  4. #4

    I will be decerning

    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Hello,



    Enjoy! But be very careful. I have never looked close for mines of thought. You might be severely misled by what looks real. My Lesson Plan keeps things simple.
    Thank you for the documents. This is such a mine field. I was one of the first to pay for membership on the pay site, but was too ignorant to grok. I never submitted a Libel of Review for lack of understanding. I am getting better, wish I had understood R4C earlier.

  5. #5
    [QUOTE=David Merrill;27287]Hello,

    Yes; I have all the important filings in the SCHLABACH matter. I call it the MENDOZA Opinion. At Doc 6, when MENDOZA began obfuscating justice I told John to Refuse for Cause his oath of office and disqualify him.

    Name:  Oath of Office SCHLABACH USDC WA_Page_3.jpg
Views: 184
Size:  193.8 KB

    Part of my strategy is to request the Oaths of Office of the Secretary, Commissioner of IRS, and any agent that dealt with my FrivPen process Using Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge. I guess I could do the judge as well. See this video Robb Ryder

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by David Neil View Post

    Part of my strategy is to request the Oaths of Office of the Secretary, Commissioner of IRS, and any agent that dealt with my FrivPen process Using Rule 5.1 Constitutional Challenge. I guess I could do the judge as well. See this video Robb Ryder
    I think you are playing the wrong side and turn.

    That FrivPen is completely administrative. The Janitor can be Judge in equity.

    You be the judge and court of record by Refusing the FrivPen for Cause timely. Show your demand for lawful money with the R4C to the US Treasury and publish it on PACER. When you get that then look for the Chief Judge oath of office in case the clerk misbehaves, or the "Judge" makes a slur.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •