Yesterday was the 150th Anniversary of the Civil War btw.Hi there! Do you still have the link to the Articles of Incorporation? I seem to have misplaced them. Thanks!
David Merrill: Yes. Several - please be more specific?
Sorry. UNITED STATES CORP. and maybe a couple of states? Thanks!
Like many of us, before we develop a sense of Rules of Evidence (look at 803 and 804) I grabbed a myth that the USA and US etc. are corporations and held on to that in light of this same kind of lack of evidence demonstrated in the above conversation this morning. It is impossible to prove that something does not exist, so there might be some Articles of Incorporation for the USA somewhere, but like with this email inquiry from this morning, the main reason the Articles have been somehow misplaced, is that they do not exist.
The USA is a body politic, not a corporation. The states too, are bodies politic.
Also, as implied herein, one of the characteristics to prove a corporation exists is to show the Articles of Incorporation. Also, there needs to be a larger body politic or corporate for which the new applying corporation needs to apply, to be in-corporated into - incorporation. I am not all that fluent and persons, Persons, PERSONS etc. are or can be corporations too, as well as corporations acquire quasi-human rights as Persons etc. So I will stick to what I have found, and through my own application of what I believe valid Rules of Evidence, pretend to Know about the myth that the USA is a Corporation.
Somebody once showed me the Articles of Incorporation for the USA. I cringe to share that over the Internet though. Like you see above, it is easy to think that the USA Inc. is something other than a little business in Delaware for promoting sports events. What you are reading above in that email conversation is a relic of somebody either intentionally or misintentionally construeing the USA Inc. to be government of some kind by the same Name.
This is the closest I can make of states incorporating.
The USA Corporation mythology is the basis of RAP/RuSA, where James Timothy TURNER is allegedly the President of the real (de jure) USA; as opposed to the Corporation (de facto) USA. That still manifests in some folks minds as quite real, and considering this man is writing from federal prison he probably had some help too (attached). Some of the issues evolving around the mythology arise from Eric W. MADSEN's Team Law. That is where the spokesman (the fellow who owns the server) for the Colorado Republic got this pile of garbage. - Rather than learn by example; Eric has been the Governor and Senator etc. for the Colorado Republic for over a decade now; why would he give up that Seat for newbies to the mythology?
Rather than to make a presumption that Colorado is a corporation I found the corporation that the AG does business through for making a claim against the fungible fidelity bond known as the Oath of Office. The Articles of Incorporation are pretty clear, and this just makes a lot more sense to me about my description above about corporate formations. The State of Colorado is a body politic formed by the USA, which is a body politic (constitutional republic) and the State is capable of registering corporations at the Secretary of State's office.
The whole business about the USA Corporation seems to evolve around Washington DC being a municipality - city of Washington, District of Columbia - Now the Districts formed in 1789 and chartered in 1790 for the debts of the USA - that is what you might consider a fictional overlay municipality. That is the concept, the abracadabra that people keep thinking is the federal government out in the States. However, when I showed the RAP/RuSA gang what is actually going on, they latched on to the formation of Washington DC as a formal municipal corporation in 1871 to be proof that the USA is a Corporation too, if you read some of the attachments a couple paragraphs back.
I tried to warn them, I assure you. But like with the correspondence quoted above, people like to hold their belief sets dear - regardless of how mature they (competence with running court) were when they formed them. I held on to the myth the USA and State of Colorado are corporations for quite a long time.
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. The Administrative Acts around 1960-61 interleave well into the Corporation mythology too. I have a gob of information about this and will share as this thread develops.
Reply With Quote