Results 1 to 10 of 76

Thread: Incorporation of the USA?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Anthony Joseph
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by motla68 View Post
    Can you find any evidence beyond a reasonable doubt it is not the states who have Full Faith and Credit and NOT the State usufructuary itself?

    See attachment:
    Name:  fancred.jpeg
Views: 294
Size:  88.2 KB
    You'll have to rephrase your question; double negative.

  2. #2
    Senior Member motla68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Within the confines of my own skin.
    Posts
    752
    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony Joseph View Post
    You'll have to rephrase your question; double negative.
    oops, talking to my wife at same time, sorry.

    Can you find any evidence beyond a reasonable doubt it is not the state usufructuary who have Full Faith and Credit versus the inhabitant people themselves as so many believe it relates to?
    Yes, there is people in the state, people who signed the Constitution BUT the word " people " is pretty general statement unless it specifies what people, would you agree?

    The Paderford vs. City of Savannah Case seems to make this distinction I believe.

    Name:  fancred.jpeg
Views: 284
Size:  88.2 KB

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by motla68 View Post
    oops, talking to my wife at same time, sorry.

    Can you find any evidence beyond a reasonable doubt it is not the state usufructuary who have Full Faith and Credit versus the inhabitant people themselves as so many believe it relates to?
    Yes, there is people in the state, people who signed the Constitution BUT the word " people " is pretty general statement unless it specifies what people, would you agree?

    The Paderford vs. City of Savannah Case seems to make this distinction I believe.

    Name:  fancred.jpeg
Views: 284
Size:  88.2 KB

    Ms. PEET signing her oath of office makes her a party to the Constitution.

    Her oath of office is a fungible fidelity bond assuring her performance will be as such - pursuant to the constitutions. Your misinterpretation of the Padelford opinion is common.

  4. #4
    Senior Member motla68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Within the confines of my own skin.
    Posts
    752
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Ms. PEET signing her oath of office makes her a party to the Constitution.

    Her oath of office is a fungible fidelity bond assuring her performance will be as such - pursuant to the constitutions. Your misinterpretation of the Padelford opinion is common.
    Alright now in that thought, where is our oath of office a fungible fidelity bond we signed off on assuring performance to be a part of the Constitution?

    Please do explain your position on this case with inserted documentation to back up your position? thank you

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by motla68 View Post
    Alright now in that thought, where is our oath of office a fungible fidelity bond we signed off on assuring performance to be a part of the Constitution?

    Please do explain your position on this case with inserted documentation to back up your position? thank you

    I guess it does not dawn on you that for people to want to learn from you they have to like you first.

    I am not going to keep trying to mop up after you, or try to stay ahead of your misdirection. I know many of the folks here are smart enough not to bother with your kind of fun.

  6. #6
    Senior Member motla68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Within the confines of my own skin.
    Posts
    752
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    I guess it does not dawn on you that for people to want to learn from you they have to like you first.

    I am not going to keep trying to mop up after you, or try to stay ahead of your misdirection. I know many of the folks here are smart enough not to bother with your kind of fun.
    This just simply does not address what I asked, if anything your reply here is a misdirection of assumption and presumption.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •