All Rights Reserved vs Without Prejudice

[allodial]

The thing with "all rights reserved" is that they will tend to play dumb and act like they don't know what it means.

[ag maniac]

Also:

curveball --> "by:first middle"

knuckler --> "at arms length"

the heater --> "V.C."

[Chex]

Shaking the cob webs of old documents..

Protecting your Rights by Signing Documents "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" by Lynne Meredith

It is a maxim of American law that any statute contrary to the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, is null and void and no Citizen is bound to obey an unconstitutional law.

"An unconstitutional statute, though having the form of law, is in reality, no law and imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power on anyone and justifies no actions performed under it..." (late Am Jur 2d Sec. 256).

It is also a maxim of the Common Law that no Sovereign American Citizen of the 50 Republic states can be compelled in any action against his or her will. The 50 Republic states currently have an admitted [Territorial] "Government de facto," which Black's 2nd Law Dictionary defines as, "a government not established according to the Constitution ... a government deemed unlawful, deemed wrongful or unjust, which nevertheless receives habitual obedience from the bulk of the community."

When the Citizen educated in the constitutional, lawful and just (de jure) American law decides he or she no longer wishes to join the herd of habitually obedient (enslaved) sheeple being led to slaughter by blind and unquestioned obedience to unconstitutional, unjust, and unlawful laws, he or she is sometimes faced with defacto employees and foreign agents, uneducated in law, oblivious to our Constitution and drunk with a false sense of power. Faced with guns, handcuffs and a potential night in jail while the law is debated, such a Citizen can be put in a position of "compromise" in order to "buy their peace." There is a remedy and recourse, out of "de facto" statutes and back to "de jure constitutional law."

Typically all it takes to "buy your peace" with the de facto government agent or official is a signature. In their mind, you have consented to waive your rights. However, if you write the words, "Without Prejudice" above your signature, you are declaring that you are not waiving any of your rights under the Constitution or Common Law and any document containing the words "Without Prejudice" cannot be used as evidence against you, in Court or otherwise.

"Where an offer or admission is made "without prejudice,"... it is meant as a declaration that no rights or privileges of the party concerned are to be considered as thereby waived or lost..." Black's Law Dictionary.

The following information comes from Bouvier's 1914 Law Encyclopedia, under "Compromise."

"It must be permitted of men to buy their peace without prejudice to them. It has been held that one may buy his peace by compromising a claim which he knows is without right (Daily v. King 70 Mich. 568, 44 N.W. 959) but the compromise of an illegal claim will not sustain a promise." Read v. Hitching. 71 ME 590.

Documents Signed "Without Prejudice" are Not Admissible as Evidence "It may, however, be considered settled that letters or admissions containing the expression in substance that they are to be 'without prejudice' will not be admitted in evidence...an arrangement stating the letter was without prejudice was held to be inadmissible as evidence ... not only will the letter bearing the words, "without prejudice" but also the answer thereto, which was not so guarded, was inadmissible ...". Ferry v. Taylor 33 Mo. 323, Durgin v. Somers, 117 Mass 55, Molyneaux v. Collier 13 Ga. 406.

"When correspondence had commenced "without prejudice" but afterwards those words were dropped, it was immaterial; 6 Ont 719.

When you do not want to be "presumed" to be waiving rights or acquiescing to de facto statutes, you should sign all documents, "without prejudice," above your signature. These documents cannot then be used as prima facia evidence against you. However if you are making claims that you may want to use as potential evidence in your favor, do not sign "without prejudice.".

[allodial]

While articles like that can be informative. They leave out this thing called: 'formal notice'. If you write "all rights reserved" or "without prejudice" on a driver license application, believe it or not you can send a letter (certified mail or regular mail) giving them notice that you have done so and in doing so you have "reserve all rights including but not limited to the right to not be compelled to perform" with respect to any contract, agreement or the like associated with the application, form or application. Furthermore you can have that letter notarized, put a certificate of service at the bottom under the notary seal and file it in a U.S. District Court misc. jacket, libel of review jacket or with the county recorder. Who'd you send it to? The head of the Department of Motor Vehicles or Department of Revenue or whatever might be. You could also send it to the State Attorney General. You could also send a copy to the State's Attorney for the given county.

You could even remind them that conspiring against your rights is a felony. One might even start the letter like this:

"To all to whom these presents may concern".

David Merrill has mentioned the right to be heard. If you aren't saying anything, how can they hear you? You see, once you explain that to them, you have made sure that they see what you have done and are aware of an intent that might otherwise be only in your head.

[Chex]

EX-10 45 sb36.htm 10.36 RELEASE AGREEMENTS

TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME OR MAY CONCERN:

GREETING: KNOW YE, That GEM SINGAPORE PTE, LTD, for and in consideration of the sum of ONE and 00/100ths Dollars ($1.00), lawful money of the United States of America to it in hand paid by BIO-PRESERVE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has remised, released and forever discharged BIO-PRESERVE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, and by these presents does for its heirs, executors and administrators, remise, release and forever discharge, its heirs and assigns, of and from all, and all manner of action and actions, causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts, reckoning, bonds bills specialties, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, variances, trespasses, damages, judgment, extents, executions, claims and demands whatsoever, in law or in equity, which against the said BIO-PRESERVE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION it ever had, now has or which its heirs, executors or administrators, hereafter can, shall or may have from the beginning of the world to the day of the date of these presents specifically arising out of the facts and circumstances which were the subject of a Convertible Debenture and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated April 6, 1999 between BIO-PRESERVE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and GEM SINGAPORE PTE, LTD.

This release may not be amended orally and any such amendment hereto must be in a writing signed by both parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set may hand and seal the 15 day of November, 2000.

/s/ Pierce Loughran
By: Pierce Loughran
Title: Authorized Signatory
on behalf of GEM SINGAPORE PTE, LTD,

Source http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/co...00166/sb36.htm

[xparte]

what application ever defines ones rights "all rights reserved"are for the applicant you have waived any rights for a privilege BEGGING IS APPLIED only Man can be with OR without prejudice Who have you applied too as a Man or the venue the person as fictional prejudice. with or without a closer look at prejudice or without prejudice fill out any application is giving appearance as a What you me who is a Man that without his assigned person gets a without prejudice benefit .

[powder]

there is no division between person or man for reserving rights or prejudice.

[Chex]

there is no division between person or man for reserving rights or prejudice.

Will you expound on that a little more?

[KnowLaw]

Also:

the heater --> "V.C."

What does V.C. stand for? And what does it mean in law?

[xparte]

Verified claim complaint the facts and the fiction with prejudicial contempt