Results 1 to 10 of 37

Thread: Lawful Money Stops IRS Proposal

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    So much contradiction

    If the IRS, Internal Revenue Service, is a non governmental,
    private agency, and in addition giving one trouble, simply
    DECLARE yourself, and all that you own, even in a court
    need be, as nothing BUT a sole subject and citizen under the Constitution
    of the United States of America, and thereby exercise and reserve
    every power and right vested to you therein, and say nothing more.
    By doing so, you thereby reclaim and re enter yourself in a jurisdiction
    of safety. Do not say what you are not, where you are not, who
    they are not , or why they can not. Why play there game, by filing
    forms and even acknowledging them as an authority, and claim yourself
    in their jurisdiction as one does when they do so? They are one of the
    most insidious Agencies to begin with, does one think they can be
    reasoned with, or not have pretensions and pretexts to injure you?
    You think they will handle you with justice. Their principles do not
    even stem from what is just, so what else could be expected,
    but problems? If one must contend with wolves, then fight them off.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by whirlingwonder View Post
    If the IRS, Internal Revenue Service, is a non governmental,
    private agency, and in addition giving one trouble, simply
    DECLARE yourself, and all that you own, even in a court
    need be, as nothing BUT a sole subject and citizen under the Constitution
    of the United States of America, and thereby exercise and reserve
    every power and right vested to you therein, and say nothing more.
    By doing so, you thereby reclaim and re enter yourself in a jurisdiction
    of safety. Do not say what you are not, where you are not, who
    they are not , or why they can not. Why play there game, by filing
    forms and even acknowledging them as an authority, and claim yourself
    in their jurisdiction as one does when they do so? They are one of the
    most insidious Agencies to begin with, does one think they can be
    reasoned with, or not have pretensions and pretexts to injure you?
    You think they will handle you with justice. Their principles do not
    even stem from what is just, so what else could be expected,
    but problems? If one must contend with wolves, then fight them off.

    Welcome Whirlingwonder;

    I think you will be enjoying it here. My take is quite contrary:

    YOU CANNOT FIGHT YOUR WAY OFF THE BATTLEFIELD.

    Since redemption is built into the Fed Act then redemption is the law. This requires forgiveness. It is an Instrumentality of the US Government but that, only because Congress has sanctioned stock in it, that depreciates over time. - Quite contrary to traditional fiduciary responsibility.

    Then again, what does that say about endorsers of the private credit. If a stock has a history of being worth less the day following...

    What's in your wallet?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •