Quote Originally Posted by george View Post
hi BLBereans,

I for one, certainly think so. it sure would catch on a whole lot faster too. thinking about it more though, what if 50% of the people are able to do this (or more)?

everything would change, not only in america but all over the world! hopefully for the better but who knows?

this does seem like the proper course of action for the lawful money remedy though! how to make it work this way?

thanks
The system in place should function properly for both endorsers and non-endorsers alike. I do not diminish the importance and honor of making the demand even if the "buying power" remedy is never realized. However, to not address the other issue with the same fervor and effort as the "income tax" issue is quite perplexing in my view.

Getting a "30% increase in pay" through lawful money demand seems like scraps compared to the big picture of getting one's rightful compensation.

$50,000 - 30% = $35,000. One receives a $15,000 increase (back to $50,000) if one claims and succeeds with their "lawful money tax filing".

$50,000 x 23.69 (current true gold ratio) = $1,184,500.00 if one receives just and proper compensation according to lawful standards.

That's a 2369% increase in pay - which would you prefer?

Lawful money 'demanders' have a rightful claim to that just exchange and buying power by virtue of declining to conduct business with, and/or accommodate for, the Federal Reserve Bank and its fractional-lending and currency-devaluing practices.