Its all a bit fishy. Consider the distance they are traveling to get to Europe and how many countries they are completely passing over to get there. Now if they were Christians (unlikely because most of the Christians may have been slaughtered), it would make perfect sense as to why they the Islamic countries won't take them. If they are Muslims, then why aren't the wealthier Arab countries absorbing them? Do they know something we don't know?Migrant Crisis: Where Have the Gulf States Been?
Why a region with $2 trillion in annual income can’t seem to spare much for the neighbors
Even recognizing all these concerns, though, it remains puzzling why five countries with a combined national income of $2 trillion have not offered credible assistance to solve the current refugee crisis. After all, they have all more or less been involved—directly or indirectly—in the Syrian civil war by virtue of having either encouraged or armed various groups. [More/source]
Attachment 2829
Look how much closer KSA (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia), Iran, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Oman are than Germany, France, UK, USA, Brazil, Ireland, etc.
Related:
- Migrant Crisis: Where Have the Gulf States Been?
- ISIS Smuggler: 'We will use refugee crisis to infiltrate West' (4,000 covert terrorists already in place 'awaiting' orders)
- Refugee Crisis In Europe: ‘Something Fishy’ Among Migrant Flood As Discarded ID Papers Appear
- Wealthy Gulf Nations Are Criticized for Tepid Response to Syrian Refugee Crisis
- Seeking a Fair Distribution of Migrants in Europe (has charts)
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by shikamaru
