Quite a few states such as the State of Mississippi are considering removing marriage licenses altogether and going back to the simple county recording system. The issue about gay marriage is really an issue of solidifying and institution of 'equality' of corporations and the civilly dead with the living. SCOTUS is out to enshrine a franchise that further entrenches the treatment of corporations as though they were living souls (writ of mortmain, etc.).Originally Posted by pumpkin
Publius Huldah made the point that states weren't in the marriage business. Perhaps the Federal Government coaxed it?
At the time of our Framing, “marriage” does not appear to have been encompassed within “public Act or record”. In Federalist No. 42 (next to last para), Madison comments on the clause in connection with criminal and civil justice. An Act of the First Congress (May 26, 1790) which implemented the clause addresses laws made by State legislatures. An amendment to the 1790 Act (March 27, 1804), addresses “records” which may be kept in any public office of the State. But this cannot have included marriage records because a number of the original 13 States recognized common law marriage. And even for States which required formalities (e.g., Virginia), marriages could be accomplished by publication of banns and subsequent recordation in church and parish records – which were not “public records”. Marriage licenses issued by the States were a later development. The meaning of the clause which prevailed when the Constitution was drafted and ratified remains until changed by formal Amendment to the Constitution. So the full faith and credit clause does NOT require States to recognize marriages contracted under the laws of other States.
It might be worth noting that when someone joins certain societies (such as those who make a covenant with death) or the military, they might become "civilly dead". If you look at the legal issues surrounding World War I and the issue of sovereign states joining with non-colonies in war--especially in the declaration of war (the subject-ites needed their masters to declare war), it raised flags because the subjects/slaves of one could not legally join with the freeborn or sovereign nations in war activity. A similar thing might hold for residents of municipalities (members of dead corporation) in contrast to associates of a county. "Do you live in the City?"For you have said: We have entered into a league with death, and we have made a covenant with hell. When the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come upon us: for we have placed our hope in lies, and by falsehood we are protected. Isaiah 28:15 Douay-Rheims (identical to KVJ)
There is a lot of lower-level, backroom manipulations going on behind the whole gay marriage thing. Another is an attempt to provoke widespread denial of rights to "Blacks" by wrongly drawing "Blacks" into parity people who have sexual fetishes and exhibitionism problems and figure that "everyone" must be aware of and approve of what they do in the privacy of their own homes. "Its none of our business" but yet they are hell bent on making it everyone's business if they can.
The terms "black" (as opposed to "Black") and "negro" should be read in parity with 'corporation' because it does not describe anyone freeborn who is outside of a servitude. The term "colored" describes a felon much like "checkered past". (Imagine generations of people being taught to bear false witness against themselves.) The lawyers behind the Gay Agenda are really furthering entrenchment of 'corporate personhood'. Why? Because they know that under Natural Law they are as the dead--dead under the law rather dead to the law. So consider men and women who perpetrate crimes perpetrated under the cover of corporate (probate) law do so because they would be dead under the law so they "make a covenant with death" to avoid the consequences. Point is that behind the scenes of the Gay Agenda (and other such similar things) its to do with revisions to long-standing principles of probate law.
With Gay Marriage, the ways by which a man or a woman can be robbed of 1/2 his stuff have been at least doubled. Palimony and regular divorce was bad enough. "Gay Marriage" gives probate courts a lot more business.
So you get this idea of 'equality' is to formulate a system where by the civilly dead are as if equal to the living which is tantamount to a conspiracy to force everyone into slavery. Equity is better then equality. Corporations could not have had their foothold on American soil without the 14th amendment. The conspiracy against rights of "Blacks" or "Moors" was just a lead-in to the 14th which would not have been needed if the conspiracy wasn't there to begin with.
It must be understood that if someone is a member of a corporation, they are 'civilly dead' and all of the inroads made for 'equality' have been toward dragging the living down to the 'realm of the dead'. Equity is about fairness. Equality is about dragging people down.
I set out on this ground which I suppose to be self-evident: 'That the earth belongs in usufruct to the living;' that the dead have neither powers nor rights over it... We seem not to have perceived that by the law of nature, one generation is to another as one independent nation to another." --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1789. ME 7:454Note the parallels:
[1] The same "Gays" that want sympathy and exemption from the sword of the state for the crimes they committed under a state's law have hardly evidenced restraint to threatening to put the sword or violence to someone who disagrees with them;
[2] The same corporations and corporate bosses who want exemption from the law for crimes they commit regularly have people prosecuted for shoplifting, stealing, etc.--but if they rob millions of billions of $ and of their livelihood and kill animals in the Gulf of Mexico they claim that they "have placed their hope in lies, and by falsehood they are protected". Yet Michael Vick goes to jail and loses his career over dog fighting? But its allegedly OK for corporations to dump radioactive waste in the Pacific or oil in the Gulf of Mexico and cause the deaths of thousands of animals--yet no one gets arrested? If you go to a BP and attempt to steal some gasoline or snacks, what would happen?
Related:
Reply With Quote