A while back Motla68 started explaining his Coresource Solution with his agreement with Sheriff HARRISON from four years ago as an example of how he had immunity from certain kinds of arrest.
I had to get away from my keyboard for a few hours and describe accurately in my mind what is agitating me about Motla68's presence and style here on StSC. To summarize, he came to us presenting a 'silver bullet'-style remedy all based around the Trust he had formed with the Sheriff and has been developing this, even intentionally getting tickets for violations, so that he can get privately into the public and make this agreement based in canon law (robin egg-blue wrapper) and sometimes never even have to say a word.
But he will not reveal even a generic template of the Agreement.
That in a nutshell is the real reason I am disturbed with his posting here. On top of that though, he exhibits earmarkings of patiot mythologies that I can prove clearly faulty, fraudulent or false; but went on a deleting spree shortly after starting his first threads here. This weekend though, he brought one up in plain view, and is now saying that I am misinterpreting his post:
I regret inserting the implication he meant me in his comment.
I think it is obvious he will soon regret addressing the issue this flippantly:
He is trying to make out like I am in error when he posted here that he has an Agreement with Sheriff HARRISON that he has special immunities from arrest. So after clearing my head I recall what it is that is agitating about that...Originally Posted by motla68
He will not describe the key part of the whole presentation! He will not show us even a generic copy of the Agreement so that we have a chance of understanding what if anything is functional about it in operation of law - public or private!
Something interesting happened a few days back. Many of you reading Motla's post will figure who, one of the suitors here who knows Motla forwarded me, in confidence a copy of the Sheriff Agreement - a sanitized rendition. I did not read it but I did save it to disk. I am not sure why, but then I think this is the first time I have had to deal with that kind of crosstalk between critical information that is 'public' for members and readers here, and what came to my email uninvited but described as private/secret. Because the intermediary is respectable I wrote back that is exactly the annoying thing going on with Motla and myself - the secrecy around this document. My feelings about this are primarily that you folks should be a lot more agitated than me, that Motla is boasting of process that he will not share. And maybe even more agitated with him now that he has disclosed that it is okay because he sent me a copy in private that I am not supposed to share with you all. And then, maybe even moreso, that he makes a direct connection to Setoff extending to paying off a roofer out of the Treasury as a privy purse.
While there is some merit to that with coupons and government/banking agents I think what really set me to be very disturbed was that Motla posted a need to lure you all away from here/me in order to... what? Be more convincing? Collect money first? What is he registering on a website to promote Coresource Solution about if he will not show us? The only logical evaluation I can make is that if he can get you over to his linked sources, blogs and websites - he intends to show you over there. Some of you have done your homework and mostly I agree with fB - that Motla is a fake and a fraud.
I am okay with all that; we are each entitled to our opinions. The misdirection and distortions of my accusations are a defense mechanism as far as I am concerned. We are all entitled to our belief sets. The main problem I have with Motla's secret agreement papers is that if they are so secret he should not be teasing us and especially me with them. He apparently knows that because he has shared his secret papers with me in secret already. I had to mull it over what is so wrong with that - and it is that he is saying now, that I agreed to keep them secret. I did no such thing! I have not agreed to keep them secret.
Nextly he is holding to my comment that I do not believe in private law. And that is a distortion because I believe the entire court system is private to the Bar Associations. Public and Private Debts are acknowledged on the Dollar. What I am talking about is just the kind of secrecy he seems to forming with me in trust - that I cannot share the Sheriff Agreement with all of you. Maybe you are understanding why I will not read it, until maybe I have already posted it openly here. If he cannot share it here, then why lure people away to not share it there too? Do you start to see it? I trust you all much more than I trust Motla, behaving the way he is.
My temptation is to call Sheriff HARRISON and beg for a moment of his time to discuss this private Agreement and maybe even have him email me a copy of it if that is agreeable. But all the earmarkings are that the reason Motla will not share it is because we will all be very irate that we waited through his 200-post melodrama all to get a look and see it. Half of us will be calling for his banishment and the other laughing. In other words I do not want to bother HARRISON about it, especially when it may be a very disturbing phone call for him to answer or even hear about.
My suggestion Motla is that you quit being so mysterious and post the contents of your Coresource Solution Agreement - the old Sheriff Agreement template; and the newest rendition with all the improvements for us to discuss. I think many of us are in agreement that you have been wasting a lot of our reading time by not doing so.
Regards,
David Merrill.
Reply With Quote