A couple days ago I kept demanding he describe the contents of the magic envelope wrapper:
He kept directing me to that same post that said there was some verbiage stamped on the Presentment. So I wanted more detail and today I discovered he excluded the verbiage that holds the remedy in his explanation. - Leaving only the Treasury Direct Redemption verbiage, that is dangerous and unproven.
Had he included the full verbiage in the opening post of this thread, things would have gone much, much differently for him here today. As obnoxious as I have found him, I would have dealt with the Treasury Direct theory like I did when he showed me the verbiage the first time; with debate and discussion.
Last edited by David Merrill; 04-07-11 at 01:21 AM.
Reply With Quote