Protection from statue seizure.

[shikamaru]

http://www.lawnow.org/expropriating-land/

Statutory, But Not Constitutional, Protection

This government acquisition of land without the owner’s consent is not subject to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms simply because there is no constitutional right for Canadians to own property.


No citizen can own property.

Suggestion:

Perhaps the right to own land is inalienable and neither constitutional or statutory?

I state inalienable with cause.

[walter]

Suggestion:

Perhaps the right to own land is inalienable and neither constitutional or statutory?

I state inalienable with cause.

Notice it starts off as "land" but then ends in "property".
Calling one sell the owner of property simply means you have an interest in the property.
No where does an interest mean that you are the title holder of the property.
All legislative works places ownership as an equity holder.

So then who holds the title to all property?
The Crown for the sovereign.

MONSTER.
—Ballentine's Law Dictionary (1930)
monster A human being by birth, but in some part resembling a lower animal. A monster hath no inheritable blood, and cannot be heir to any land.

Lower animals don't have the power to create. Humans possess that power.
But yet humans don't take advantage of that power and allow others to rule over them.
They allow a legislative assembly to be their handlers. Which in return puts one against the sovereign and "peace, order, and good government".
By doing that the human loses the ability of inheritable blood.
So the nanny state is placed as trustee of all titles until the human grows up and creates their own right to claim their inheritable blood line.