Praying to an electron microscope

[David Merrill]

Great turn! As presented here it would be the Wapnicult of Nihilism.

This is nothing but a dream, according to the skew Ken WAPNICK spun on Helen's daily LSD trips.

[xparte]

Ego vs Ego was created in the mind or only assembled there?Gold has Anti gravity properties when its Mono atomic or Etherium or Ormus has health benefits as a God particle super conductor? single atoms ``Theology and its discontents: The strict finitist rejects the infinite as a pernicious futility inherited
from outmoded philosophies and confused theologies; he can get as
far as he likes without it.
. . . we may allow ourselves one of the few anecdotes in this book.
It echoes Gordan’s outraged cry when he read Hilbert’s finiteness
proof in the algebra of quantics. A devout intuitionist closed his
New Testament after reading The Gospel according to Saint John
for the first time in his life with the ecstatic whoop, “This is not
theology, it is mathematics!” (Bell, 1945, p. 561)
There is no identifiable referent for this story. Bell leans heavily on anekdota as
meaning not published. The intuitionist is not Kronecker with his God-created
integers since Bell has just cited Kronecker as a finitist critic of intuitionism. The
only plausible candidate is Brouwer but no one else links Brouwer to the Gospel
according to John. More likely it is a fictitious paradigmatic intuitionist.
The point is that precision is not the point. Theology is exciting. It is about
unseen existence. It is about the infinite. It has passionate, even ecstatic arguments.
I do not mean theology never aims at precision. I mean this appropriation of it
aims elsewhere—and has different aims in different versions.
Bell connects this bit of theology directly to another:
The two most aggressive factions of mathematical theologians—
in Gordan’s sense—of the 1930’s, the abstract-algebraist and the
topologist, found much to dispute. According to an expert observer
bulletining from the front in 1939, “In these days the angel
(1937) is famous for stereotyping, romantic inaccuracy, and its inspiring influence on
many young mathematicians. His (1945) would be a great contribution to the history of 20th
century mathematics if more people read it.
THEOLOGY AND ITS DISCONTENTS: THE ORIGIN MYTH OF MODERN MATHEMATICS
of topology and the devil of abstract algebra fight for the soul of
each individual mathematical domain.” . . . May the better angel
win, if anything is to be won. David Hilbert's foundation myth for modern mathematics, just a duality george arrangements engagements left brain right brain mathematical mash up to a God particle trying to balance duality self zeroing the physical and spiritual. measurements or sands of time has a way of changing everything but truth has no way of changing time.? the trinity pry open another eye.

[george]

does this fit me? :

The Battery Theory of Self
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1101771/pg1

interesting.

[David Merrill]

The Transform:


Attachment 3386



When this comes into focus, are you looking out of the Bush, or looking at the Bush?