The Libel of Review has changed only slightly in fifteen years. Recently I tried a variation where the new suitor challenged pegging the US note to the Federal Reserve note in value.

Albeit fluff, as in the goal is still an evidence repository, a record, the suitor found as is typical the "judge" entered a Final Judgment for Jacob Joseph LEW, even though LEW did nothing to reply or defend. So with this "federal judge" entering Final Judgment the clerk of court was still compelled to publish the True Judgment on the clerk's finding of facts.

Lately it would seem to occur to the IRS agents/attorneys that if they delay in giving a refund then they also owe interest and penalties. So in the example below you might believe me that while the IRS has gone silent about the suitor's recent redemption, they sent a letter about the prior year, before his partial redemption tax year. In the letter the IRS forgives the alleged $18K outstanding and intends to send the suitor $2K. Note the Judgment attached is for $12K but with the partial redemption year, that the suitor decided not to claim a refund, the Letter shows the exact balance of complete redemption.

This makes my point about the Bank and Fund banking on your funding by signature bond. Instead of the $12K the suitor gets $2K and complete forgiveness for all commitments and obligations of endorsement.

My first reaction was the suitor needed to R4C the Letter. Upon conversing with wise counsel the Offer in the Letter should be accepted, but stipulating with a cover letter:

DEMAND

Please be clear that all transactions are redeemed in lawful money pursuant to Title 12 USC §411 and §16 of the 1913 Federal Reserve Act.
The cover letter and the redacted Letter (no SSN) will be of course published in the evidence repository too. The $2K Treasury check should be along shortly...