The fiat dollar (meaning the FRN) is based on floating debentures over persons and things in the district.Originally Posted by Michael Joseph
Re: Vicars of Christ
Vicar means "instead of" as if Christ or God were dead or absent. Who needs a vicar for someone that is alive and present? Errant AFAIK is the idea that Rome-Babylon defeated Yeshua the Anointed and took over the entire Judahite/Davidic estate and co-regency is contrary to the scriptures (he asserted that the only reason they were able to have at him is because the Father allowed it as part of a plan--he knew what they would do and they played into their own bloodlust). According to the scriptures, the kingdom is conferred on the saints and Christ. A proper grasp on the divine council paradigm, (pre- 70 A.D. concepts of) merkaba and the OT throne motifs (I'm not talking about any post 70AD Talmudic or any Kaballistic writings on Merkaba but the book of Ezekiel, Psalms 82 and the like instead) blows all confusion and boggle out of the water (Eph. 1 & 2). Even the Centurion who had his daughter healed remotely had a firmer grasp on this than others in his day. The strong impression is that the Idumeans or Roman System perceived some kind of co-regency of Yeshua/Jesus with the one named at Exodus 3:14 and figure they owned it as a result of crucifixion/conquest ('capture the society, capture their god'--remember Simon Magus tried to make a purchase of divine power)--thus the mocking signage "King of the Judeans" (what was related to me was that the signage was done because it was intended as a form of 'finalization of conquest'--to somehow seize and possess the Davidic co-regency -> Essau/Edom vs. Jacob/Israel). No doubt, Pilate like his Centurion underling got the gist of this and so he wanted no part of it.
The history of wide-spread killing of non-Roman-Catholic saints/believers perfect makes sense as part of an orchestrated, fully-conscious effort against the divine council's activities on the planet--MEANING THAT SOMEONE IS FULLY AWARE OF WHAT THEY DOING to the extent that are specifically targeting heirs. As things move forward, it is very likely that many will start to see such intense outpourings and manifestations of divine power through the saints.
According to scripture, Jesus Christ and the saints have been in session since the ascension ~30 A.D. Scripturally, such authority was never concentrated in a single man or European or Asian or African monarch or king. 30 A.D. was long before Constantine's time.
BTW, last year or so, a scriptural based spiritual warfare group began praying and interceding to remove witchcraft and sorcery from their region, within a few weeks I noticed that a prominent building associated with a very well-known society went up for sale. It struck me as being far from mere coincidence.
Rome and Persia's Secret
In the 2015 Christmas episode of Arrow, in a casual conversation one character explains Christmas to someone from another reality: that it is a celebration of killing Jesus Christ (of dismissing him--of his (dis)MISSAL)! One might figure she didn't mean what she said but that is what many have said before including but not limited to the creator of a site (christmasisalie.com) about Christmas that is heavily censored. I believe there are very upstanding folks who are Roman Catholics, Protestants and non-Protestants. It may be that some organizations are prone to corruptions that must necessarily be dealt with one way or another.
Every year Nativity Scenes promoting worship and adoration of statutes of the baby Jesus in the manger. Likely, a baby in a manger is a lot easier to handle than a fully-grown divine co-regent with a scepter in his hand along with thousands if not millions sharing the co-regency with him. It has been suggested that tearing of the veil meant tearing of the 'protective shield' between the presence of God and those who perpetrated regicide against the divine council: judgement.
Re: Iran and Christmas
Despite all of the fuss about Iran: Christmas trees are put up around December 25th in Iran. Someone shared photos with me. No surprise, if you know where the Christmas tree originated (Persia)! It was illegal to celebrate Christmas in United states of America for the longest time (just maybe because celebrating regicide against the divine council was highly frowned upon and regarded to be abhorrent?)
Re: Isaiah 63
There are those who glean from Isaiah 63 that the text suggests the Messiah in the nativity sense coming from Edom. The impression I get is that the figure's robes is traveling from Edom and his robes are stained with blood because he just Edom visited judgement upon Edom.
While there may have been Idumeans/Edomites who sincerely became Judahites (then they would have become Judahites rather than Idumeans), Obadiah 1:10-12 is referring to Edom. I am very much reminded of the Idumeans helping Rome and Ptolemy (who was over Egypt at the time, thus highly suggestive of "king of the south") with the seiges of Jeruslem, Israel and Judah from 130AD to 70AD. At that time, were not the Idumeans as "one of them" as in allegedly part of Judah and also as "one of them" among the strangers laying siege around 70AD? Did not the Roman soldiers cast lots at the crucifixion? Were not the Herodians and company considering how they would divvy up Judah and Israel? Is Edom doing the same thing to the saints this very day? (Related: Has the world ‘looked the other way’ while Christians are killed?; 100 Years Ago, 1.5 Million Christian Armenians Were Systematically Killed. Today, It’s Still Not A ‘Genocide’; Persecution of Christians in the Soviet Union).For your {you = Edom/Esau afaik} violence against your brother Jacob shame shall cover you , and you shall be cut off for ever. In the day that you stood on the other side, in the day that the strangers carried away captive his forces, and foreigners entered into his gates, and cast lots on Jerusalem, even you were as one of them. But you should not have looked on the day of your brother in the day that he became a stranger; neither should you have rejoiced over the children of Judah in the day of their destruction; neither should you have spoken proudly in the day of distress. Obadiah 1:10-12
War Against the Saints
War against the saints might just be intended to be war against the divine council. If the book of Enoch has any validity, then it might be giving clues as to who or whose progeny would have the propensity to wage such a war.
Reply With Quote