The East India Company: The Original Corporate Raiders

[David Merrill]

Does somebody know Gary and/or Lucia? Could you tell me their number?

Of course I was asking rhetorically to make my point, about a fearful process server. This is blatantly faulty process if you have trouble or cannot even contact the process server.

http://os.dc.gov/service/notary-and-...ation-services

and for a Certificate of Commission on Maria SOTO...

http://os.dc.gov/service/authentications

faqs... http://os.dc.gov/node/1123331


I will order one up in the morning. It will go well as a second page to the Affidavit. My query has produced Gary's phone number. Thank you for the message! I might advise him my opinion that without proper contact information on the Affidavit, the document is faulty.

[David Merrill]

Judy is emailing a Commission Certificate to me and mailing the paper to my process server, later today. I will show you all.

Remember that western Judeo-Christianity bases finding of fact on the two-witness system.

[xparte]

There is one thing to extract something from the Bible and implement it. It is another to project into the Bible something that is not there. The Catholic Church isn't in the bible but the war started in heaven and as above so bellow with a DEMOCRATIC Demonstration [LUCIFER] the DEMOCRATIC french, via medieval Latin from Greek d?mokratikos, from d?mokratia (see democracy). , from Greek demotikos "of or for the common people, in common use," from demos "common people," originally "district," from PIE *da-mo- "division," from root *da- "to divide" (see tide). In contrast to hierarchic. Originally of the simpler of two forms of ancient Egyptian writing; from Middle French démocratie (14c.), "popular government," from demos "common people," originally "district" (see demotic), + kratos "rule, strength" (see -cracy).
Democracy implies that the man must take the responsibility for choosing his rulers and representatives, and for the maintenance of his own 'rights' against the possible and probable encroachments of the government which he has sanctioned to act for him in public matters. [Ezra Pound, "ABC of Economics," 1933](see demotic),or demonic perhaps the hierarchic.pertaining to sacred things," 1660s, from Latin hieraticus, from Greek hieratikos "pertaining to a priest or his office, priestly, devoted to sacred purposes," from hierateia "priesthood," from hiereus "priest," from hieros "sacred, holy, hallowed; superhuman, mighty; divine" (see ire). Related: Hieratical (1650s).It would be for them patterned after a heaven full of the divine council ruled by the one named at Exodus 3:14? Different constellations, different models, different outcomes?Christ ended that war in heaven .we were made flesh physical guilt is conscience .The true image of heaven is its no democracy thats my point Cannon added nothing to the bible i can only speak on this kingdom of platitudes It is another to project into the Bible something that is not there. a bible was presented too heaven the image of the spiritual world in our physical institutions, that is, the state which exists here on earth, but which is really an image of heavenly facts and personalities, but not a true image.Christ is the true image minus all heavenly facts and personalities fallen ones. the rapture and anything democratic lodi i have no doubt the Different constellations, different models, different outcomes? are all the heavenly facts and personalities we are created images good and bad originally "district," from PIE *da-mo- "division," from root *da- "to divide" (see tide). My observational kingdom is without agency.

[allodial]

Those that aim to profit from guilt and carnal persons would aim to benefit from obscuring true and sound doctrine: imagine being given power, wisdom and hedges which help you avoid the generation of, say, "bad karma" or "bad mojo" for yourself (whether in respect of your inner and immediate biosphere, any biological contracts, social-political sphere or otherwise) and in general help you steer clear of trouble and to keep trouble away from you. Now, those that would aim to profit from ensnaring you (don't hunters tend to be competent with snares and such?) of course probably wouldn't want you to be aware of such doctrine and might even make a point to entice you as much as possible with counterfeits. However, as they say: "You can't keep a good man down." The pushing of counterfeits has ulterior motive: maintaining a captive audience--the opposite direction of liberty.

"For my yoke is easy and my burden is light." --Matthew 11:30

The true walk isn't about guilt. Its about liberty, abundance, joy, wisdom, freedom from the law of sin and death. The bad propaganda against the true doctrine seems to moreso benefit men hunters, keeping folks carnal, vulgar, profane and in the dark might be a strategy for maintaining a supple of two-legged livestock, eh? And on that note, specialists at manipulating carnal crowds probably prefer democracy based on simple majority votes.

[David Merrill]

Correspondingly:


I AM THAT REDEMPTION I AM.

[Michael Joseph]

Correspondingly:


I AM THAT REDEMPTION I AM.

Php 2:5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
Php 2:6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:

verse 5 is a command to think as Christ Jesus thought - well how did Christ Jesus think? That is in verse 6 - he did not think it robbery to be equal with God. Who can hear?

What are those fruits? Response: He took on the role of servant - verse 7

Php 2:7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:

[xparte]

We seek for the Spirit that reveals itself in the Word; for the Spirit is with God, and the Spirit is God.” moving from the word to the spirit, our individual perception and knowledge of the spirit. shares large libraries the librarian is Christ Even when truth is uttered it is not always seen in the aspect where it becomes of importance in life. Such a truth assumes importance only when we perceive its consequences. We are not just physical beings we are moral or maybe immoral beings in earthly existence. What we do is determined by impulses of a moral nature.

Kant wrote two “Critiques”: the Critique of Pure Reason, concerned with the relation of man to a purely natural course of things, and the Critique of Practical Reason where he puts forward his moral postulates which in truth figuratively hover in the air, come out of the blue and have not a priori relation with natural causes. If earthly humanity follows impure moral impulses, then the body of the earth will be different from what it would be were the moral impulses pure. The range of man's vision is not wide enough to perceive that what happens externally in the course of nature is not dependent upon purely natural causes.


.
The effort applied in study that lets itself be guided by healthy human reason can be part of the struggle which leads eventually to ones vision of the spiritual world. by enduring sufferings of body and soul for the sake of that salvation or sacrifices. Christ has become a companion of men, leading them, first, away from the battle with [Lucifer, Self ] Individual thought is physically separated in words but morally specific .I haven't sacrificed my mystical obligation.from the bleachers from the tennis court from the role of servant. all be guided by healthy human reason.

[allodial]

The meeting of the Estates General did little to help Louis XVI solve the economic crisis.

The high amount of debt accumulated by previous kings (American Revolution, Palace of Versailles, etc.) made it difficult to give the economy the boost it needed--there simply wasn't enough cash around.

Also, Louis didn't want to give up any of the crown's power and authority just to help out the commoners.


Frustrated with this lack of action, the Third Estate declared itself the National Assembly of France (the law making body) in June of 1787.

Hearing the news, Louis had the new National Assembly locked out of their meeting hall. The Assembly moved to a nearby indoor tennis court and took an oath not to disband until they had written a French constitution (hence the "Tennis Court Oath") and created a new government.

Of course, this new constitution would not include the king...

Summary of Tennis Court Oath events from Boise State University.

[David Merrill]

Hi Allodial;


I may have missed a couple points but could you please explain how through the Crown (Templars) and initiates like Benjamin FRANKLIN and Thomas JEFFERSON the French Tennis Court/court affected the American Revolution too?

[allodial]

I may have missed a couple points but could you please explain how through the Crown (Templars) and initiates like Benjamin FRANKLIN and Thomas JEFFERSON the French Tennis Court/court affected the American Revolution too?

This book is a comprehensive study of the history of the political thought of the Dutch Revolt (1555-90). It explores the development of the political ideas which motivated and legitimized the Dutch resistance against the government of Philip II in the Low Countries, and which became the ideological foundations of the Dutch Republic as it emerged as one of the main powers of Europe. It shows how notions of liberty, constitutionalism, representation and popular sovereignty were of central importance to the political thought and revolutionary events of the Dutch Revolt, giving rise to a distinct political theory of resistance, to fundamental debates on the 'best state' of the new Dutch commonwealth and to passionate disputes on the relationship between church and state which prompted some of the most eloquent early modern pleas for religious toleration.

First, I suspect American high schools leaving out particulars of the Dutch Revolt do students a hefty disfavor. Why? Because it may be that the ideals behind the Dutch Revolt carried over into the American Revolution moreso than that of the French revolution (it is suggest that the monarchy was a vicitim of PSYOPS). In the same way the early American Revolutionists are mischaracterized as rebels and personalities like Locke and Bacon, the American Revolution might be errantly twinned with the French Revolution instead of the Dutch Revolt. Pairing it with the Dutch Revolt ties in too much with the idea of a Bible based society without mischaracterization of the gospel. Pairing the American Revolution with the French Revolution on the other hands might serve to pair the American Revolution with a more atheistic philosophies which may very well be to mischaracterize it.

• The American Revolution and War of Independence Was Not A Rebellion (By Gray W. Clark)
• Leibniz, Not Locke, Inspired the Declaration of Independence
• How The Venetian Virus Infected and Took Over England
• The Venetian Takeover of Enland: A 200-Year Project
• Doing Good In the World: Cotton Mather and the Origins of Modern Philanthropy
• Essays to Do Good (Cotton Mather - 1825 / Multiple formats at archive.org)
• Abraham Lincoln & Freemasonry

Nonetheless, I'd also suggest it to be important to consider that crowns and rulers existed before the Templars. I don't suspect there to be a single 'crown' although one or more shops might wish to impose 'only man in town' syndrome on the planet. Consider the pundits of 'world takeover' as having a very bad allergy to the Tennis Court Oath and so forming the UN and fomenting wars ('wars costs money + debt as slavery' paradigm) to increase debt and thwart shaking off of debt. A 'security problem' in Africa might be where a debt saddle country throws sheds its State and forms a new one: troops get sent in, the leaders is called all the negative Orwellian bad-buzzwords. Pervert dictators with perverse sexual appetites are easily pleased and fed by dark handlers. Men who care about their country will demand equity and the money system comes under scrutiny PDQ.

You concurred that the Templars traced themselves back to the post-1099 "king of Jerusalem" paradigm. Other similar or related organization may very well subscribe to teh same idea. So the story goes, they thought they were reliving a "when you see Jerusalem surrounded" prophetic event--but little did they know that happened 1,000 years before. But they didn't realize that until later. Legend has it they discovered some secret that they believed they could wield against the Papacy. Maybe the story has something to do with mischaracterization of the gospel? Perhaps they continued that tradition of mischaracterization if there was any? The claim of Europeans kings that they can trace their lineage back to "King David"? Meaning David Al-Roy vs David of ancient Israel? Same sound different kings, makes for quite the deception. It seems very unlikely the six-pointed star was something David of the Old Testament would have held as his family symbol. Its doubtful that Samuel would have allowed him to live for too long if he had. The evidence, however, shows that David Al-Roy was associated with that star (regarded to be the Star of Remphan/Chiun/Saturn-- Chiun allegedly being another way of spelling 'Cain'... China?) and that some of his successors may have carried it forward.

One of Bonaparte's grievances against Cacault was a saying attributed to the latter: "How many sources of his glory would cease if Bonaparte ever chose to play Henry VIII!" Even in those days of harmony Cacault had a presentiment that the Napoleonic policy would yet threaten the dignity of the Holy See.

Robespierre becomes god Christians are massacred under the new Atheist fervor in 1792-1793

The idea is that the French Revolution was about bringing Feudalism to an end. Another idea is that the NWO pundits are aiming to bring feudalism back on as planetary a scale as possible. But yet we see the same overthrowers of the French monarchy instituting collectivism and closed oligarchy. Same shoes, different feet? Isn't that what the Bolsheviks did????



Interestingly in Italy, Aristotle is widely presented in high schools. Seems that Aristotle found oligarchies to be quite "tasty".

Atheism is aristocratic; the idea of a great Being that watches over oppressed innocence and punishes triumphant crime is altogether popular. Maximilien Robespierre

Interesting: atheism + aristocracy ("No god but us"?) + Gnostic idea of a universe with equally matched forces of good and evil.


Qos also means 'bow.



Turkey coat of arms.

Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a fruitful bough {ben is used here} by a well; whose branches run over the wall: The archers have sorely grieved him, and shot at him, and hated him. Genesis 49:22-23 (the word archers is queshet...similar to quesh/qos, no?)

Related:

• Cult of the Supreme Being
• Collectivism
• Cult of Reason
• Charles Joseph Bonaparte [creator of the FBI]
• Aldrich–Vreeland Act (1907)