Lawful Money and Zip Codes

[David Merrill]

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

"...if you look outward
you will imitate others without understanding..."

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Yep. While teaching and learning are the same thing. I noticed while studying We Are 12! Grappling with the Great Commission; an eight week course spoofing the Sea Hawks slogan, that the Great Commission is translated to TEACH when the meaning of DISCIPLE is to LEARN. I think a lot is lost in that mis-translation.

[doug555]

I'm still not sure how to do this... anyone?

What if I wrote a check against the receiving checking account to another checking account at a credit union and wrote RLM on that deposit slip? Then I'd have a physical paper trail to establish my RLM position at 1040 filing time.

Yes! That paper trail is non-hearsay evidence that is thereby admissible in any court, IMO.

See below excerpt from http://1040relief.blogspot.com/p/getting-started.html

"Notice that 12 USC 411 has no corresponding Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) regulation to restrict anyone’s method of demanding lawful money. I think that is VERY significant. The Parallel Table of Authorities has no entry for 12 USC 411. This table’s entries go in sequence from 12 USC section 391 to section 418 (see table list extract below). Notice that Section 411 is missing! There is no regulation for statute 12 USC 411.

http://www.gpo.gov/help/parallel_table.txt
[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Parallel Table]
[Revised as of January 1, 2011]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access]
PARALLEL TABLE OF AUTHORITIES AND RULES
12 U.S.C. <—————————> Corresponding C.F.R.
================================================== =====
378……………………………………….. ………12 Part 303
391….31 Parts 202, 203, 209, 210, 225, 240, 306, 317, 321, 341, 346,
351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 363, 375, 380
418……………………………………….. ………31 Part 601
461………………………………….12 Parts 201, 204, 208, 217"


This means the WAY you make YOUR demand is NOT regulated. Just make it so it becomes ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE so it sufficiently rebuts the PRESUMPTION you were USING private fiat currency that invokes a USAGE FEE (aka "income tax").

Read: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_803

[Michael Joseph]

Yes! That paper trail is non-hearsay evidence that is thereby admissible in any court, IMO.

See below excerpt from http://1040relief.blogspot.com/p/getting-started.html

"Notice that 12 USC 411 has no corresponding Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) regulation to restrict anyone’s method of demanding lawful money. I think that is VERY significant. The Parallel Table of Authorities has no entry for 12 USC 411. This table’s entries go in sequence from 12 USC section 391 to section 418 (see table list extract below). Notice that Section 411 is missing! There is no regulation for statute 12 USC 411.

http://www.gpo.gov/help/parallel_table.txt
[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Parallel Table]
[Revised as of January 1, 2011]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access]
PARALLEL TABLE OF AUTHORITIES AND RULES
12 U.S.C. <—————————> Corresponding C.F.R.
================================================== =====
378……………………………………….. ………12 Part 303
391….31 Parts 202, 203, 209, 210, 225, 240, 306, 317, 321, 341, 346,
351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 363, 375, 380
418……………………………………….. ………31 Part 601
461………………………………….12 Parts 201, 204, 208, 217"


This means the WAY you make YOUR demand is NOT regulated. Just make it so it becomes ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE so it sufficiently rebuts the PRESUMPTION you were USING private fiat currency that invokes a USAGE FEE (aka "income tax").

Read: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_803

Also the law is not a respecter of persons.