Originally Posted by
David Merrill
The problem is that you can show no success stories that do not depend on the remedy written into the law. You showed one or two that had the remedy and something else too and you think that it was the other thing. You do not have any success stories that exclusively have the other thing - other than the remedy. I am not pissing on your parade here. I am just clarifying exactly what it is that you are showing us and what it is that you are trying to assure us is true.