Thank you and I owe you more than an apology Motla68 - like I said. I have processed the images so they can be read a little more easily:

http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/1...ttickethea.jpg
http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/3...tticketdis.jpg

I apologize for allowing the inference you are a liar to stand. I actually felt that you would be surprised by handcuffs rather than you were lying. The redemption of lawful money is elevated to an even more esteemed position by your intrepid nature and fearless endeavors to understand law and nature.

The non endorsement verbiage is a variation that suitors have not formulated:




Exchange for Credit on Account
Deposit to State of North Carolina
The Owner of Account
Care of Treasury of State of North Carolina
:The Usufructuary
Authorized Signatory X per (legal name)
(signature line)
The NAME
Persona non grata


You are obviously treating the Statement of the Charges as the financial instrument that it is.

Just the same, I find it a bit confusing because I do not understand the trust structure well enough. Michael Joseph is correct though - the scriptures, especially Genesis are good instruction on trust and contract law.

Thank you for taking that trip to show us so that we were not left wondering. I feel you have been respectful of my court's rules of evidence by doing that. I am glad it did not cost you much out-of-pocket.

I am curious though; have you renewed the registration yet?


Regards,

David Merrill.