Page 8 of 11 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 102

Thread: Why Women Destroy Nations, Civilizations

  1. #71
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    A Mr Magoo moment on my part for sure.



    P.S. In all fairness though, my point is that if Moxie can spot transgendered people, then it is not a problem keeping the undesired out of the personal dating selection.
    You seem to know an awful lot about vaginas.


    But can you tell the difference between a man's and a woman's bone structures and fat distributions?
    It's easier to fool people than to convince people they've been fooled. ~ Mark Twain

  2. #72
    Transgenders on the Titanic - new movie.




    Sorry again. I will drop it now.


    P.S. Can you tell me if the girl on the opening post video is a man?

  3. #73
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Transgenders on the Titanic - new movie.




    Sorry again. I will drop it now.


    P.S. Can you tell me if the girl on the opening post video is a man?
    Yes! A man:

    Broad, boney shoulders, long arms, high navel, minimal thigh fat distribution, and plastic surgery hips. Almost looks like the head was photoshopped onto the body; (this is in the still photo before hitting play.) Horse face, like Jillian Michaels, who is also a man. I need a closer shot of the face, but likely the male brow ridge has been waxed and artificial brows implanted above the brow ridge. Keep in mind these people take hormones for life. As they get older, their original gender becomes hard to conceal. A lot of them have surgery down below to mimick the real thing.


    The Titanic? DiCaprio is one for sure and Winslet, too.

    Easy ones to spot for beginners: Michelle & Barrack Obama; Serena and Venus Williams; Beyonce; Niki Minage; Bond Girls from James Bond movies; Margaret Thatcher; any of the Royals.....
    Last edited by Moxie; 06-09-16 at 02:09 AM.
    It's easier to fool people than to convince people they've been fooled. ~ Mark Twain

  4. #74
    I haven't been around California much. I wonder how Bruce JENNER pulls of getting so much attention when these transgenders are running around EVERYWHERE?

    No need for an answer Moxie. I just prefer to think of here as a young woman. California or not.

  5. #75
    Quote Originally Posted by Moxie View Post
    T h a n k y o u ! :-) Exactly

    ---------------------------------

    The whole reason I posted what I did was not for my benefit or gain. It's to point out that SO many men have been fooled by transgenders for so long. They believe the women on the cover of Sports Illustrated is really a woman, or the women in their favorite girly mag/naughty movie are really women. They believe feminists they see on tee vee or YouTube or read about are real women with original factory parts, when they are transgenders. Michelle Obama IS A MAN. YES. Hillary. YES. Trump is a woman. YES. Sick? Diabolical? Absolutely. These are the feminists that come to mind when I hear the word "feminist." And the thread is about feminists, correct?



    Some people don't want to discuss Hollywood, that's fine, just remember those fantastic classic rock songs we all grew up with were sung by trannies. ;-)


    What I find compelling is an ex-satanist giving their testimony on how they used to live in the dark and why Yeshua is King Of Kings and why they ran to Yeshua for their life. Literally. It's helpful to know what makes a Believer (especially new or weak ones) easy prey in their eyes, and some ex satanists spell it out in their testimony. And not all of them walk around covered in tattoos wearing AC-DC tee shirts. They blend in.

    Many here have left behind the IRS and other agencies, never to be part of their lives again, yet they continue to discuss those agencies here. Now why is that? To help others "avoid the same iceberg" they crashed into. To help them get a DEEPER perspective beyond: "Just don't do that; 'just stay away from that, it's bad." I wanna know WHY it's bad without dappling in it. I want to recognize the small-print warning on the pretty bottle. That's where I'm coming from.
    I started noticing about ten years ago how the women on covers of magazines started to look a bit more masculine. It really amped up I'd say around 2009. Back in the late 80s, early 90s, believe it or not, as part of an investigation I came across a situation on at least one Midwestern state university that had a cabal that would send trannies after Christians especially Blacks Christians to see if they could fool them. Same university had a propensity to assign Christians to gay blocks in dorms or under gay RAs and oddly enough the veritable cabal of gays all kept it secret and that of course meant university management were involved and knew the religion of the intended victims (if they put it in a form or asserted preferences for a roommate having the same beliefs) and thusly working with a group of students and keeping the secret from them AND the police being manipulated somehow to avoid or thwart prosecutions. To them it was just a sick game that they justify in the name some ideology of supremacy or another. (As for the young Christian girls, the lie of feminism would be their poison of choice.)

    If you've heard anything about University of Missouri, Columbia aka Mizzou, well let me put it this way it wouldn't surprise me AT ALL if bigots drugging and sodomizing Black male students wasn't somewhere in the Mizzou closet of skeletons collection as to what catalyzed the problems on campus. But see its not fashionable to report it in the MSM because sodomites are "supposed" to be "harmless" rather than predatory and because the cabals that refuse to enforce the law when these things are reported add insult to injury. Can you imagine what parents would do if they knew that kind of thing went on at any university? It wouldn't surprise me if president that resigned knew the kinds of things that were going on.

    The Gay Agenda seems to be a cover for the Trojan Horse of normalizing male owner ship ownership other males. There is much evidence that the sodomites believe themselves to have 'married' the person they sodomized as if it were some way to 'consummate' a master-slave relationship (look into the reports regarding sodomy-related inductions in ISIS, etc). On that note, sodomite influence over media and fashion industry has reflected the caustic hatred for shown for women by homosexual males who hate the competition (i.e. females): so they push for overly skinny models pushed to dyslexia, normalization of the heroine addict look, etc--its like they enjoy seeing the women suffer (extreme narcissism mixed with rebellion against anything and everything wholesome--psychopathology). And interestingly enough they have admitted these things in their own writings. There are plenty of homosexual men who hide their homosexuality because they don't want to tip off potential victims. If someone got revenge they'd call it "gay bashing", hide the truth and pretend as if were was just random 'hate crime' against "innocent gays". To really put it in perspective: consider how pointing a gun in someone's face would be taken as a cause to kill someone but a buggerist with a deadly disease who knowingly exposes 300 men to the disease is given a light sentence as if he stole a Twinkie. If they kept to themselves it would be one thing, but they don't.

    What sick minds can find that kind of thing acceptable? No doubt in my mind, the Great Purge will come soon.

    P.S. Those who think body gender is some kind of irrelevant thing in Christ's view might do well to consider that if a trustee entrusts you a specific set of equipment and you rebel against the trusteeship and either abandon your estate or damage the trust corpus: do you think the trustor will be OK with that? Also, if the mere act of spilling seed was a sin on the part of Onan, then clearly spilling seed into the body-sewer of a another man would be a sin, wouldn't it? Equality in the spiritual sense isn't some excuse to ignore the gender differences. Before some 'genius' runs off into the deep end regarding eunuchs, I'll put this forth: if someone were to become a Eunuch "for the sake of the kingdom" doesn't [1] mean becoming a semen receptacle for another man; [2] would be simply giving up the sexual reproductive facet of his life altogether. If a eunuch is still a man then surgery to make a woman look like a man or vice version doesn't change their bodily gender.

    Related:
    The Myth of the Rule of Law
    Last edited by allodial; 06-09-16 at 08:31 AM.
    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

  6. #76
    So I find it confusing now...


    Do women destroy nations, or do they restructure them for female ownership rights? One seems petty and cruel while the other seems quite strategic and manipulative. I might consider I stalled out to go invent biocosmetric sonoluminescence. Which I am grateful for by the way.

  7. #77
    Feral vs civilized vs regenerate? Or is it the men that allow them to get away with it?
    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

  8. #78
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    I wonder how Bruce JENNER pulls of getting so much attention when these transgenders are running around EVERYWHERE?

    My opinion: The Kaitlyn Jenner "coming-out" magazine covers were designed for the masses who are not aware that transgenderism has been around for centuries. That way, when they see "Kaitlyn", who looks half man and half woman, not even a convincing woman! they think, "Wow! That's what transgenders look like! Half man and half woman! Ew! But it's on the cover of People, so it must be ok to do this now." That way, the transgenders who have fooled the masses for decades (like Marilyn Monroe!) can keep blending in and fooling people while curious straight people feel more comfortable experimenting with this in public.

    The goal is depopulation.
    It's easier to fool people than to convince people they've been fooled. ~ Mark Twain

  9. #79
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    So I find it confusing now...


    Do women destroy nations, or do they restructure them for female ownership rights?
    My opinion: transgenders posing as women and the straight women who jump on their political bandwagon do both. Transgender men and regular men help, too. BUT... neither can reproduce. All they can do is adopt children and turn them into transgenders.

    Transgenders in the entertainment industry follow satan, this is the trade off of "making it big", they imitate the baphomet, and satan is all about deception. To be both man and woman at the same time is deception. Leading a straight man or woman to believe a transgender is straight is deception. To destroy God's design is their goal. Their fishing lures are music, movies, beauty, sex, politics, etc.

    If pastors were smart, they would study this stuff and expose it to Christians. But no, they bury their head in the sand. Too bad. If a man was addicted to porn, and it was destroying his marriage, tell that man that he's been pleasuring himself to trannies and prove it to him. I bet that truth would stop things faster than any pastor's guilt trip could.

    That man might plea, "But my wife had 5 kids and she just doesn't look the same down there!" Tell that man: "The movie/magazine you're looking at -- that "woman" gets $$$$$$ worth of plastic surgery done down there and the industry pays for it. It's all silicone, nip tuck. And that's not a woman you're looking at. Why do you think plastic surgeons are a dime a dozen? This is why! They're not just for some lady who wants a nose job. The stuff you never hear about is where they make their money.

    The man might say, "But Michelle and Barrack Obama have children! How can they be trannies?" Those are not their children. George Clooney and Amal Amudin are not having a baby like the check-out magazine says. It's ALL fiction designed to get you to believe these are real couples. It's so people will identify with them and emulate them. "Oh, Amal Ammudin is so beautiful I'm going to name our first daughter after her!" Lady: you're naming your daughter after a tranny.

    See how it works?
    It's easier to fool people than to convince people they've been fooled. ~ Mark Twain

  10. #80
    Quote Originally Posted by allodial View Post
    I started noticing about ten years ago how the women on covers of magazines started to look a bit more masculine. It really amped up I'd say around 2009. Back in the late 80s, early 90s, believe it or not, as part of an investigation I came across a situation on at least one Midwestern state university that had a cabal that would send trannies after Christians especially Blacks Christians to see if they could fool them. Same university had a propensity to assign Christians to gay blocks in dorms or under gay RAs and oddly enough the veritable cabal of gays all kept it secret and that of course meant university management were involved and knew the religion of the intended victims (if they put it in a form or asserted preferences for a roommate having the same beliefs) and thusly working with a group of students and keeping the secret from them AND the police being manipulated somehow to avoid or thwart prosecutions. To them it was just a sick game that they justify in the name some ideology of supremacy or another. (As for the young Christian girls, the lie of feminism would be their poison of choice.)

    If you've heard anything about University of Missouri, Columbia aka Mizzou, well let me put it this way it wouldn't surprise me AT ALL if bigots drugging and sodomizing Black male students wasn't somewhere in the Mizzou closet of skeletons collection as to what catalyzed the problems on campus. But see its not fashionable to report it in the MSM because sodomites are "supposed" to be "harmless" rather than predatory and because the cabals that refuse to enforce the law when these things are reported add insult to injury. Can you imagine what parents would do if they knew that kind of thing went on at any university? It wouldn't surprise me if president that resigned knew the kinds of things that were going on.

    The Gay Agenda seems to be a cover for the Trojan Horse of normalizing male owner ship ownership other males. There is much evidence that the sodomites believe themselves to have 'married' the person they sodomized as if it were some way to 'consummate' a master-slave relationship (look into the reports regarding sodomy-related inductions in ISIS, etc). On that note, sodomite influence over media and fashion industry has reflected the caustic hatred for shown for women by homosexual males who hate the competition (i.e. females): so they push for overly skinny models pushed to dyslexia, normalization of the heroine addict look, etc--its like they enjoy seeing the women suffer (extreme narcissism mixed with rebellion against anything and everything wholesome--psychopathology). And interestingly enough they have admitted these things in their own writings. There are plenty of homosexual men who hide their homosexuality because they don't want to tip off potential victims. If someone got revenge they'd call it "gay bashing", hide the truth and pretend as if were was just random 'hate crime' against "innocent gays". To really put it in perspective: consider how pointing a gun in someone's face would be taken as a cause to kill someone but a buggerist with a deadly disease who knowingly exposes 300 men to the disease is given a light sentence as if he stole a Twinkie. If they kept to themselves it would be one thing, but they don't.

    What sick minds can find that kind of thing acceptable? No doubt in my mind, the Great Purge will come soon.

    P.S. Those who think body gender is some kind of irrelevant thing in Christ's view might do well to consider that if a trustee entrusts you a specific set of equipment and you rebel against the trusteeship and either abandon your estate or damage the trust corpus: do you think the trustor will be OK with that? Also, if the mere act of spilling seed was a sin on the part of Onan, then clearly spilling seed into the body-sewer of a another man would be a sin, wouldn't it? Equality in the spiritual sense isn't some excuse to ignore the gender differences. Before some 'genius' runs off into the deep end regarding eunuchs, I'll put this forth: if someone were to become a Eunuch "for the sake of the kingdom" doesn't [1] mean becoming a semen receptacle for another man; [2] would be simply giving up the sexual reproductive facet of his life altogether. If a eunuch is still a man then surgery to make a woman look like a man or vice version doesn't change their bodily gender.

    Related:
    The Myth of the Rule of Law
    YES exactly! This stuff is for real.
    It's easier to fool people than to convince people they've been fooled. ~ Mark Twain

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •