This is what I found about three days ago:
link (pdf).
Originally Posted by
Gavilan
Spoke to them, and supposedly the omission is per editorial action of the Law Revision Council due to being redundant with another portion of the code.
You ask "Redundant with what portion of the code"?
***
Remember, one might have to be diligent to keep them from blurring the distinctions between United States territorial jurisdiction and that of the several states. Whether a state officer pretends to not know or doesn't know is irrelevant.
Things the U.S. Congress in its territorial mode might be able to legislate over Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, federal courthouses, U.S. military bases doesn't have any potency or weight among the several states of the American confederacy. The several states are not "the Land" (as pertains to the "law of the Land"). Something being "the law (lore) of the land" means for due process it is part of that body of documents or principles which judges have to take judicial notice in court cases. "the land" or estate of the United States is limited to its territories, districts and possessions. The several states are neither its territories, its districts nor its possessions.
Reply With Quote