Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Saving to Suitors DEFINED

  1. #1

    Saving to Suitors DEFINED

    Hello

    I am seeking to know what "Saving to Suitors" means, looked around a bit, tried the search bar for 'Saving to Suitors and it went to a paypal donation result.

    Thanks in advance

  2. #2
    Thank you Harold;


    The short version is to show the banner. So we will install this at the top, and fix up any problems misdirecting readers to the Donate button... Sorry.

    Name:  banner.JPG
Views: 152
Size:  303.5 KB

  3. #3

    TY

    No apology needed , I'd say its a brilliant name given its origin


    although the reference "as well as upon the high sea's" establishes the need for choice of law as a priority in any/all exercise of rights/remedy


    Out of the state. In reference to rights, liabilities, or
    jurisdictions arising out of the common law, this phrase
    is equivalent to "beyond sea" (q. v.). In other connections,
    it means physically beyond the territorial limits of
    the particular state in question,

    (state of mind is the first question, land or sea, sea or beyond the sea)


    Q.V. An abbreviation of "quod vide," meaning "which
    see".


    and what rabbit hole would neglect to add a symbol (?) which see?
    Sedes Sapientiae?



    The high seas, solicits a maritime choice of law right from square one, which could move the venue out of state, physically beyond the territorial limits and into the twilight zone where common law is not competent to give it "remedy"

    remedy still exists though to suitors which see which sea










    I apologize, it really is a brilliant name

  4. #4
    Senior Member Michael Joseph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    peaceful inhabitant on the Earth
    Posts
    1,424
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Thank you Harold;


    The short version is to show the banner. So we will install this at the top, and fix up any problems misdirecting readers to the Donate button... Sorry.

    Name:  banner.JPG
Views: 152
Size:  303.5 KB
    Juxtapose the United States districts against this:


    Title 12 Section 222




    The continental United States, excluding Alaska, shall be divided into not less than eight nor more than twelve districts. Such districts may be readjusted and new districts may from time to time be created by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, not to exceed twelve in all:

    Provided

    That the districts shall be apportioned with due regard to the convenience and customary course of business and shall not necessarily be coterminous with any State or States. Such districts shall be known as Federal reserve districts and may be designated by number. When the State of Alaska or Hawaii is hereafter admitted to the Union the Federal Reserve?[1] districts shall be readjusted by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in such manner as to include such State. Every national bank in any State shall, upon commencing business or within ninety days after admission into the Union of the State in which it is located, become a member bank of the Federal Reserve System by subscribing and paying for stock in the Federal Reserve bank of its district in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and shall thereupon be an insured bank under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act [12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq.], and failure to do so shall subject such bank to the penalty provided by section 501a of this title.

    (Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §?2 (part), 38 Stat. 251; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §?203(a), 49 Stat. 704; Pub. L. 85–508, §?19, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 350; Pub. L. 86–3, §?17, Mar. 18, 1959, 73 Stat. 12.)



    AND




    Title 12 Section 223




    A Federal reserve district shall contain only one Federal reserve city.
    (Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §?2 (part), 38 Stat. 251.)



    AND



    Title 12 Section 224



    The organization of reserve districts and Federal reserve cities shall not be construed as changing the present status of reserve cities except in so far as this chapter changes the amount of reserves that may be carried with approved reserve agents located therein.
    (Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §?2 (part), 38 Stat. 253; Pub. L. 86–114, §?3(b)(5), July 28, 1959, 73 Stat. 264.)


    ============

    As you can see the Federal Reserve System has its own CITIES and DISTRICTS [Capitus Maximus].
    Last edited by Michael Joseph; 08-14-16 at 10:59 PM.
    The blessing is in the hand of the doer. Faith absent deeds is dead.

    https://www.lawfulmoneytrust.com

    ONE man or woman can make a difference!

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by heraldharbinger View Post
    No apology needed , I'd say its a brilliant name given its origin


    although the reference "as well as upon the high sea's" establishes the need for choice of law as a priority in any/all exercise of rights/remedy


    Out of the state. In reference to rights, liabilities, or
    jurisdictions arising out of the common law, this phrase
    is equivalent to "beyond sea" (q. v.). In other connections,
    it means physically beyond the territorial limits of
    the particular state in question,

    (state of mind is the first question, land or sea, sea or beyond the sea)


    Q.V. An abbreviation of "quod vide," meaning "which
    see".


    and what rabbit hole would neglect to add a symbol (?) which see?
    Sedes Sapientiae?



    The high seas, solicits a maritime choice of law right from square one, which could move the venue out of state, physically beyond the territorial limits and into the twilight zone where common law is not competent to give it "remedy"

    remedy still exists though to suitors which see which sea










    I apologize, it really is a brilliant name

    The foundational "fluff" for the Libel of Review is still that when one approaches a man or woman on the land, from somewhere else (the districts/Fed) they must do so through the district courts of the United States. Of course the little enclave called "mailbox" is sufficient. But then, that becoming common knowledge would lead everybody to redemption even faster.

  6. #6
    and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land.

    Is that referring to the common law? And if so, is that also predicated upon express reservation?

  7. #7
    Senior Member Michael Joseph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    peaceful inhabitant on the Earth
    Posts
    1,424
    Quote Originally Posted by pumpkin View Post
    and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land.

    Is that referring to the common law? And if so, is that also predicated upon express reservation?
    does not the term "seize" develop the idea of "take" - and that which is "taken" is either "abandoned" or "possessed by force." Nevertheless who may possess the land but one who has made claim to the land or one who has at his/her disposal an army willing to kill to gain rights to the land.

    If one is making claim to the land then one is developing a new Estate and said Head of State is a Suitor who courts - as in dates - and the foundation upon the marriage [contract], if there be an engagement, is the common law. Certainly we do not wish to trespass upon another's claim to rights of use of the land.
    The blessing is in the hand of the doer. Faith absent deeds is dead.

    https://www.lawfulmoneytrust.com

    ONE man or woman can make a difference!

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Joseph View Post
    does not the term "seize" develop the idea of "take" - and that which is "taken" is either "abandoned" or "possessed by force." Nevertheless who may possess the land but one who has made claim to the land or one who has at his/her disposal an army willing to kill to gain rights to the land.

    If one is making claim to the land then one is developing a new Estate and said Head of State is a Suitor who courts - as in dates - and the foundation upon the marriage [contract], if there be an engagement, is the common law. Certainly we do not wish to trespass upon another's claim to rights of use of the land.


    Elegant and poetic!

    It is suiting that as Rosh HaShannah and Yom Kippur approach on this seventieth Jubilee since the invasion of Canaan that we find this indictment regurgitated on the Record, in the same Court.

    Some times, like the US Treasury Vault video (indicating value in US notes), I wonder if you can all appreciate seeing things that you are not supposed to be viewing.



    First though; remember the name - Bradley MANNING.

    Name:  Doc 26 Warrant 03 403_Page_1.jpg
Views: 114
Size:  275.3 KB

    Name:  Doc 26 Warrant 03 403_Page_2.jpg
Views: 110
Size:  171.8 KB

    And from the Notice of Lien, about the Sealed Warrant:

    Name:  Doc 27 Re Warrant_Page_1.jpg
Views: 109
Size:  644.1 KB

    Name:  Doc 27 Re Warrant_Page_2.jpg
Views: 103
Size:  496.3 KB

    Name:  Doc 27 Re Warrant_Page_3.jpg
Views: 104
Size:  352.7 KB

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •