Quote Originally Posted by Michael Joseph View Post
does not the term "seize" develop the idea of "take" - and that which is "taken" is either "abandoned" or "possessed by force." Nevertheless who may possess the land but one who has made claim to the land or one who has at his/her disposal an army willing to kill to gain rights to the land.

If one is making claim to the land then one is developing a new Estate and said Head of State is a Suitor who courts - as in dates - and the foundation upon the marriage [contract], if there be an engagement, is the common law. Certainly we do not wish to trespass upon another's claim to rights of use of the land.


Elegant and poetic!

It is suiting that as Rosh HaShannah and Yom Kippur approach on this seventieth Jubilee since the invasion of Canaan that we find this indictment regurgitated on the Record, in the same Court.

Some times, like the US Treasury Vault video (indicating value in US notes), I wonder if you can all appreciate seeing things that you are not supposed to be viewing.



First though; remember the name - Bradley MANNING.

Name:  Doc 26 Warrant 03 403_Page_1.jpg
Views: 1619
Size:  275.3 KB

Name:  Doc 26 Warrant 03 403_Page_2.jpg
Views: 1292
Size:  171.8 KB

And from the Notice of Lien, about the Sealed Warrant:

Attachment 4387

Attachment 4388

Attachment 4389