Unbaliable Warrant after RFC

[Michael Joseph]

Hi David,

My name is also David but i used a different name for my user name. Anyway, i am a basic member of your Trust site. i have recently made an affidavit for lawful money put in at my bank and the bank manager accepted it and said he would forward it to his legal department as he never heard of such a thing. I told him i wanted it attached to my account signature card. i didn't hear back form anyone so i assume it's all set now. I did that just last week. i've been looking at your research for a little while now. So i do have a little background, still i am struggling. i need a bit more of a fast track to some success as the more time this is taking the more stress i am feeling. A good amount of Time and energy i have expended on learning and dealing with a couple of big things: my son who has been stolen from i and a default warrant to be exact. Been using a common law approach to everything so far. I think i need to upgrade my membership to get access to the video lessons you suggest. it's been very challenging as i have been tying to get my son restored and i have been trying to deal with an alleged warrant for another default of driving unlicensed. Anyway, i sent many notices and letters to man and women to clear the warrant. No RESPONSE. All my documents have been getting ignored and these would be "authorities" acting very underhanded and dishonorable as you can see in the documents i posted. Tried recording some documents at the county as well and they are not telling the truth and not recording my documents. It's complicated. You're comment was she dismissed it as "time served" That's good for her because, if it was time served, it was my time stolen from i along with my son and i believe would not have served 1 second had i enforced properly the RFC. i did the honorable thing in good faith and was treated dishonorably and in bad faith in return. I don't think it's too late to enforce it now to hold accountable the wrongdoers for trespass. have you ever seen an unbailable warrant for an alleged driving offense?

I have found that trying to educate a bank employee is a waste of time. I instruct my trustees to make a demand for lawful money per 12 USC 411 on each commercial instrument negotiated and to make copies of front and back of all commercial instruments. In other words, the trustee keeps a record of all of his transactions. We do not rely upon the bank. As long as the bank gives us cash we are fine with that transaction.

Banking is a practice thus a license is granted to those who wish to engage the Estate. If the banker is ignorant, that is not my problem. My beef is not with the banker, it is with the IRS, the Banker can't help me. I am the captain of this ship. Therefore, to give the banker anything is a waste of time. When the account was opened the Trustee clothed his signature with a "demand for lawful money per 12USC411".... he sometimes also uses "absent accommodation" to further establish the point.

Said authorities are trustees. They are bound by bylaws. If they can't find your request in their bylaws upon which they may grant relief, then most likely you will be met with silence. I am fond of showing them they may grant me relief that I seek. It saves me time.

In effect, I treat the bank as a store selling a product. The banker applied for a license to practice banking as such said license subjects said bank to higher contracting powers. Noone made the banker apply for the benefit to practice banking as such, it is the duty of the banker to be knowledgeable of rules/codes/regulations which govern banking practice. Ignorance is no excuse. One should not apply for the license if one is not able to abide by the bylaws and regulations which govern the Use [practice].

I recently wrote the following to one who is getting a bit tired of wasting time on many who like to have their ears tickled but never act to better their situation:

Yes, I can see now why you can say the practice of the external law is fools folly. Yet, what can we say about Paul? Who in type is everyman [regenerated man that is]. Paul knew Hebrew Law [that of Israel] those who receive a new name from Saul to Paul. So Paul was sitting in the Mercy Seat with Christ.

Paul knew Greek Law and Roman Law. So we can see Spirit, Soul and Body. Do we have any information concerning Paul's death or did Paul spiritualize both Soul and Body as Yehoshuah in transfiguration? I can't say.

I agree with you that one who comes to transmutation/transfiguration is not in the least bit subject anymore to Greek and Roman Law. For there is no flesh body for these laws to operate upon! And therein is the key.

But thereto is also the path made clear. If one focuses only on the external body, then one by implication subjects one's self to those laws and what the Mind focuses upon is made, created, fashioned and formed into this reality. I don't see one escaping this reality until the thoughts are lifted up higher from the Earth [base consciousness]. For Jacob [Mental] I loved, but Esau [flesh, carnal consciousness] I hated.

So I can now wholly appreciate your statement. In fact, I have come to a point where I am finding it hard to open my mouth. For what am I to say to one who is wholly engaged in the Carnal Law? I find myself in the Abram part of my journey. I have gotten up and moved but now I seem to be still with this bondsmaid. I need to send her away.

I have become fond these days of just asking "should one marry if one cannot keep their vows?" I think that gets it done in both the inner and outer courts.

Shalom,
MJ

[allodial]

Hello X;


It helps to set up an evidence repository.

I was speaking with a suitor earlier today. He Refused for Cause a criminal trial in February. The R4C is great, if you have a proper record. It would seem that if you know this process that the "authorities" will resort to underhanded and criminal behaviors.



P.S. Thanks for linking some of the documents. I offer a Lesson Plan:

1) True Identity
2) Record Forming (Refusal for Cause)
3) Redeeming Lawful Money

All three must be used together and in concert. If you are chattel then well...

It looks to me that the intelligible uttering by the black-robed attorneys was simply, "Time served."

If you miss #1, they will figure you they are talking to nameless/deadless/nobody. All they will see is a vessel and an incompetent captain/surety stranger.

I have found that trying to educate a bank employee is a waste of time.

If I were to give advice I would probably suggest that one only deal with banks whose directors, senior counsel mail, fax or email information can be readily obtained (there are directories that can be found at libraries and at law libraries for this) and to always determine the bank's chief counsel/senior counsel's fax number, telephone number, email, mailing address and name and the EIN/FEIN/TIN of the financial institution and if possible their state tax ID and charter numbers and OCC charter number if the financial institution is federally licensed. IMHO the key persons to know or interact with at a bank on are the one's whose names are listed on the corporate filing at the state level or at the OCC or the directors or executives listed on their website (typically in the investor relations section). That is, it might be best to deal with the 'back room boys' without expecting the characters on the theatrical stage on the public side to have any clue beyond the basics. However, two of the most key figures in the retail banking setting (typical bank lobby) is the notary on staff and the branch manager. If the branch manger is clueless, the rest of the staff probably will be. That means that all that 'high level' or 'complicated' stuff can be communications between you and the 'chiefs' (senior counsel, chief financial officer or chief executive officer, director listed on the corporate filing).

Important bank info:

• name, fax #, telephone #, bar # of senior counsel;
• bank's EIN/TIN/FEIN, OCC charter # if applicable, state charter #, state bank license #.

The same thing goes for DMVs/state revenue: the communication with the directors/heads need not be known of by the gal/guy at the front desk. If you get things sorted with the guy upstairs, the gal/gay at the front desk will be forced to comply and be without any clue whatsoever why there is some record that says "this guy gets his license simply by showing a letter from the director. no further requirements." As they say "do your homework". Turning it in to the janitor probably won't get you too far.