Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: The Objective of Deviant Oaths

  1. #1

    The Objective of Deviant Oaths

    Some times I wonder if I would have ever spotted the objective of deviant oaths, to nullify bonding and leave the illusion of judicial and sovereign immunity, had I never become party in interest to the Constitution. What I mean is that by signing the Declaration of Independence I have quite literally posted a bond - my Life, Estate and Sacred Honor, just as my predecessors did. But this is only fresh on my mind because a new suitor had located the signature of approbation process in the organic laws, some time back.


    Look at the bottom footnote on the left side:


    Name:  Approbation Footnote USC.JPG
Views: 281
Size:  463.3 KB
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Ergo, the objective is fraud. These same fraudsters--as another part of the same deception--promote the idea of simply wearing a uniform equates to being intra vires when in fact the law is that if someone perpetrates a felony while wearing a uniform they are in fact a felon in disguise and without the protection of sovereign immunity and subject to the status of having a wolf's head. (Also see Wolf's head or caput lupinum.)



    Regarding oaths of office click here to fast-forward to the 8:54 mark (for some reason the embedding doesn't skip ahead). Beyond that, regarding the video, lack of tags is just asking for trouble IMHO, a USDOT number or get some exempt tags are options. I have noticed plenty of references in movies associating Washington, D.C. (District of cHa'OL(Y)M(P)ia with Olympus.

    Name:  Olympus-Has-Fallen-Quad-Poster-UK.jpg
Views: 266
Size:  1.35 MB
    Other the obviation made by the poster, the second in the Percy Jackson series made overt reference to D.C. being Olympus.

    Name:  en-capitol-minerva.jpg
Views: 231
Size:  8.9 KB
    Minerva-Athena standing (signifies an aggressive claim) atop the U.S. Capitol Building.

    ***

    Someone put Olympus in an interesting perspective saying it to have been #1 in affinity with fallen Eve (deathless Athena ...Lilith seems to be code for Athena-Eve), #2 representative of rebellion against the Creator God/Godhead of Genesis, #3 that the Creator wasn't allowed in Olympus and was regarded to be a safe-haven from the Creator God/Godhead of Genesis. So would it follow that if we were to find a modern day Olympus there would be: #1 presumed death, #2 "no common law here", #3 no Bibling or religious tests, #4 admiralty only (presumed lost at sea)? Think: underworld, Anubis. [Hint: AFAIK the Egyptian jackal was in fact a reference to a wolf.]

    Since Sirius is the Dog Star, let us turn to the dog-headed Sumerian goddess Bau. According to Thorkild Jacobsen,1 'Bau seems originally to have been goddess of the dog and her name, Bau, to have constituted an imitation of the dog's bark, as English "bowwow".* Bau was also the daughter of An. So here the dog-goddess is the daughter of An, whereas in Egypt the dog-god was himself An-pu (Anubis).
    Name:  l.jpg
Views: 268
Size:  21.2 KB

    So perhaps it might be that deviant oaths might also evidence a hatred or a disregard for a jurisdiction for which the deviant office quasi-holder holds great disdain.

    Name:  canberra-australia.jpg
Views: 246
Size:  62.6 KB
    Canberra, Australia.

    Consider it could be said that that Australia has its own local Olympia called the Australian Capital Territory.

    When you get past the fog and lies, it becomes clear that there is an agenda thousands of years old and a conflict to boot lurking behind the propaganda: the modus operandu is telling.
    Last edited by allodial; 10-08-16 at 05:16 PM.
    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

  3. #3
    The court says Kavanaugh took the oath required by the Constitution and another for judges that is part of federal law in the same room where the justices meet for their private conferences.

    The 53-year-old justice’s wife, children and parents were in attendance.

    Chief Justice John Roberts administered the constitutional oath and retired Justice Anthony Kennedy administered the judicial oath. Kavanaugh is replacing Kennedy on the bench and once served as his law clerk.
    I saw where KAVANAUGH considered William Rehnquist - who signed a valid oath - his "judicial hero." What are the chances he signs a valid oath?

  4. #4
    Check it out for yourself!

    Name:  FOIA Request HUDSPETH_Page_1.jpg
Views: 99
Size:  220.9 KB

    Name:  FOIA Request HUDSPETH_Page_2.jpg
Views: 100
Size:  107.5 KB

    Name:  FOIA Request HUDSPETH_Page_3.jpg
Views: 96
Size:  103.4 KB


    It is typically a three-step process. The DoJ denies the request and then they fill it. But with KAVANAUGH you will get testimony. Whatever that is. This will be interesting!

    You can copy and paste the template. Just plug in the name.

    Name:  oath.gif
Views: 100
Size:  61.0 KB

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    134
    Quote Originally Posted by marcel View Post
    What are the chances he signs a valid oath?
    Slim to none. His early career shows him assisting the cover-up of the Vince Foster investigation. Another establishment tool of the deep state. I wonder if some of these judges even read or comprehend what's put in front of them to sign. Although people can change, so - here's hoping he does the right thing.

  6. #6
    Guess what? KAVENAUGH signed a valid oath!
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  7. #7
    Look again! This is very revealing about the secret Principal.

    There was no Appointment Affidavit supplied with the oaths. The reason is that the Appointment Affidavit has the wrong oath! There are two oaths cited on the typical "SO HELP ME GOD." oath. The Title 28 is for Judges and Justices while the Title 5 oath is for Civil Servants.


    Rather than familiarize yourself just remember the clause about rich and poor is for judges and justices.

    This is what the DoJ produced on Mr. Brett KAVENAUGH:

    Name:  Response KAVENAUGH 3.jpg
Views: 43
Size:  280.3 KB

    and

    Name:  Response KAVENAUGH 4.jpg
Views: 44
Size:  305.8 KB

    Mr. John Glover ROBERTS will only sign the incorrect oath for the Civil Servants so long as the "So help me God." is correct, meaning that the oath is worthless as a fidelity bond.

    The oath that looks correct, for the Judges and Justices has something very wrong with the Witness! I went through the names of Associate Justices and none of them are even close. That is Brett himself, signing as his own witness!

    I might excuse him because he is denying the secret Principal (NEPHALIM/ Sons of God). So let's say he could not find any Associate Justices to sign for his witness. But he scribbled it in an attempt to fool me; and almost did.

    Most interestingly is discovery of the secret Principal - the Imperial and Royal Court of the Dragon Sovereignty.

    Name:  Enki Enlil Dragon Court.jpg
Views: 43
Size:  277.8 KB

    Indeed I believe you to be correct in your assessment of who built this
    "train station" - Reference is made to The Matrix.
    This may or may not be in response to the above post. But it is definitely in regards to my discovery of the Principal.
    Last edited by David Merrill; 11-03-18 at 08:22 AM.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    134
    I haven't seen KAVANUAGH's Appointment Affidavit so can't comment there. You are suggesting forgery; a serious allegation. The witness/signature on the first oath does appear to be John ROBERTS Jr. - similar enough to the signature found on his Wikipedia page that I believe it's the same signer. Perhaps a somewhat hurried signature.

    The second oath was said to be administered by Anthony M. KENNEDY and his signature can be found on the retirement letter he wrote this summer appearing here: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/27/u...eme-court.html
    If that is KENNEDY signing the oath then it does differ somewhat from the retirement signature. However, signatures can change over time, and as health deteriorates (silent stroke?). I haven't heard anything but at age 81 it's certainly possible his health is failing and maybe why he's retiring. I don't know, it's hard to believe the incoming justice would forge a signature.
    Last edited by lorne; 11-04-18 at 12:34 PM.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by lorne View Post
    I haven't seen KAVANUAGH's Appointment Affidavit so can't comment there. You are suggesting forgery; a serious allegation. The witness/signature on the first oath does appear to be John ROBERTS Jr. - similar enough to the signature found on his Wikipedia page that I believe it's the same signer. Perhaps a somewhat hurried signature.

    The second oath was said to be administered by Anthony M. KENNEDY and his signature can be found on the retirement letter he wrote this summer appearing here: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/27/u...eme-court.html
    If that is KENNEDY signing the oath then it does differ somewhat from the retirement signature. However, signatures can change over time, and as health deteriorates (silent stroke?). I haven't heard anything but at age 81 it's certainly possible his health is failing and maybe why he's retiring. I don't know, it's hard to believe the incoming justice would forge a signature.
    Name:  Kennedy Retirement Letter.jpg
Views: 22
Size:  64.7 KB

    There is KENNEDY's retirement letter stating he retired July 31, 2018. He retains "senior status" through Title 28 USC 371(b). During this time he can perform very limited "work".

    work

    (A)the term “work” means a work of art or other object of cultural significance;
    But I am going to say KENNEDY signed it, for a moment. Even though his deteriorating signature suspiciously takes on the characteristics of KAVENAUGH's signature. I just do not think that KENNEDY has the authority as a senior retired justice to be Witness to his replacement's oath of office. Remember that there are the still current active justices available and then also consider that on the same day, and probably in the same meeting Mr. John Glover ROBERTS signed the incorrect, civil servant oath of office.

    Why would not ROBERTS sign the judge and justice oath?

    I put the significance on the question I know. I have been watching all this for quite some time through the brain trust of suitors, most of whom are competent at execution of redemption. I have become confident that ROBERTS has "SO HELP ME GOD." on his oath, or has no oath at all. This is why the Department of Justice will not provide the oath for ROBERTS. The DoJ however did provide this online oath and I hear that the suitor did not request the Appointment Affidavit or Commission docs like I had presumed was done.

    So here I compose the scenario that the DoJ is showing me what the DoJ wants me to see.

    They want me to see that KAVENAUGH has signed an oath that has the plain English "So help me God." like the correct 1789 law and Title 28 USC form requires. I imagine this might extend to me making a stink that KAVENAUGH has committed forgery so that agitate parties might attack him, then the DoJ will make a big press release that KENNEDY signed and is suffering a stroke, or more likely Parkinsons. This would help distract from the recent accusations about juvenile sexual misconduct while exonerating KAVENAUGH from the forgery accusation.

    Technically it would not exonerate KAVENAUGH at all in my opinion. An improperly witnessed oath is no oath at all. KENNEDY is no longer in capacity and authority to be witnessing oaths of office. They are not art and is not a matter of cultural significance. The senior justice designation is retirement alright - but designed to maintain a salary until he dies.

    Either way, KENNEDY's oath of office should be requested. I hear it is easy enough. Please show us all Mr. KENNEDY's oath of office. Remember to request his Commission and Appointment Affidavit too please.


    'When any judge of any court of the United States, appointed to hold his office during good behavior, resigns his office after having held a commission or commissions as judge of any such court or courts at least ten years continuously (or otherwise), and having attained the age of seventy years, he shall, during the residue of his natural life receive the salary which is payable at the time of his resignation for the office that he held at the time of his resignation. But, instead of resigning, any judge other than a justice of the Supreme Court, who is qualified to resign under the foregoing provisions, may retire, upon the salary of which he is then in receipt, from regular active service on the bench, and the President shall thereupon be authorized to appoint a successor; but a judge so retiring may nevertheless be called upon by the senior circuit judge of that circuit and be by him authorized to perform such judicial duties in such circuit as such retired judge may be willing to undertake, or he may be called upon by the Chief Justice and be by him authorized to perform such judicial duties in any other circuit as such retired judge may be willing to undertake, or he may be called upon either by the presiding judge or senior judge of any other such court and be by him authorized to perform such judicial duties in such court as such retired judge may be willing to undertake.
    Last edited by David Merrill; 11-13-18 at 01:40 AM.

  10. #10
    Looking deeply makes me wonder about KENNEDY wording the Letter without specifying if he retires or resigns. Look in the Notes. He uses the word "end" intentionally being unclear?

    I found an article- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senior_status


    It may seem I am spending far too much attention on this but out of two Registered Priority mailings with a notice to the Dragon Court, both with the same contents to Scottish Rite and the United Nations, both have gone awry in transit. The one to the Boys at the 33° has a note I have never seen:

    Your package will arrive later than expected, but is still on its way. It is currently in transit to the next facility.
    That one is five days late like they figured delaying through Friday would give them the three-day Veteran's Day weekend. The one to the UN left the Seattle area and not a whisper online since the 6th!

    Your item departed our USPS facility in SEATTLE, WA 98168 on November 6, 2018 at 11:52 pm. The item is currently in transit to the destination.
    Since the notice contains a solid true bill I am not too surprised. At the last minute I put in the information about KAVENAUGH and that fishy Witness signature. Even if it is KENNEDY signing Witness, it is a hot potato. Most interestingly though, in contrast to all the federal "judges" with "SO HELP ME GOD." bond-dodging, the KAVENAUGH oaths simply seal indictment on the entire judiciary!

    Name:  resign v retire.jpg
Views: 8
Size:  142.6 KB

    Any way about it, KENNEDY should have been specific by using either the word resign or retire. Especially considering the distinct deterioration in his ability to write and sign legibly. It causes me to imagine American mobster TRUMP orchestrating the swearing like managing his gambling casinos.


    'When any judge of any court of the United States, appointed to hold his office during good behavior, resigns his office after having held a commission or commissions as judge of any such court or courts at least ten years continuously (or otherwise), and having attained the age of seventy years, he shall, during the residue of his natural life receive the salary which is payable at the time of his resignation for the office that he held at the time of his resignation. But, instead of resigning, any judge other than a justice of the Supreme Court, who is qualified to resign under the foregoing provisions, may retire, upon the salary of which he is then in receipt, from regular active service on the bench, and the President shall thereupon be authorized to appoint a successor; but a judge so retiring may nevertheless be called upon by the senior circuit judge of that circuit and be by him authorized to perform such judicial duties in such circuit as such retired judge may be willing to undertake, or he may be called upon by the Chief Justice and be by him authorized to perform such judicial duties in any other circuit as such retired judge may be willing to undertake, or he may be called upon either by the presiding judge or senior judge of any other such court and be by him authorized to perform such judicial duties in such court as such retired judge may be willing to undertake.
    P.S. I have never had any trouble with Registered Mail before.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by David Merrill; 11-13-18 at 02:03 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •