Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Colorado Territory Stolen in 1861 - Captured the World!

  1. #1

    Colorado Territory Stolen in 1861 - Captured the World!

    Allodial explained what I believe is only part of the picture:

    Quote Originally Posted by xparte View Post
    well explain the circus building i am performing in first
    It seems that the respective territorial jurisdictions of Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Democratic Republic of Germany or of the United States are misrepresented as being organic and original jurisdiction. Treaties non-high-contracted and executive agreements are limited to the territorial jurisdiction (the EU's involvement in the UK is likely only territorial but is presented deceptively as organic). When someone approached the UK courts concerning the EU they were told "it is a political question" so the courts didn't want to touch it. I translate it as: it is something that you contract into, it is not organic law it is a presumptive participation in the territorial jurisdiction of the UK which is the only thing a PM could have possibly attached to the EU without the people's authority. So basically, if the banks of the World have a debt being held over the United States, the only thing they have a claim against would be the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. That is, the UN is restricted to the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. Its a political question was to whether or not you have volunteered into that realm.

    The reason Scott Bartle of Australia is finding two governments running in parallel in Australia (one being the Commonwealth of Australian and the other being the Australian Government) is because the territorial (imperial/extra-constitutional) government and the organic government of the states of Australia have two different constitutions. The same may very well apply to THE CANADA. As in perhaps when Canada is exercising its territorial jurisdiction (signified perhaps by ON, BC, PE, AB, etc) it is acting inorganically. As in the territorial government of Canada is a state in and of itself. Immigration in Canada is probably only ever into its territorial jurisdiction. The territorial jurisdiction of the United States is by design external to the members of the confederacy. The U.N. is by law confined to the territorial United States.

    So because someone merged the territories of many countries, it doesn't give them any power outside of the territories. However, a grand deception could work to make it seem so. You have to fall for it ("its a political question").

    Related terms: admiralty jurisdiction, maritime jurisdiction, plenary power, territorial jurisdiction, possession, territory, 'state and territory', district, 'district state', resident, stranger.

    Q. Why didn't I learn this is public school?
    A. Because public schools don't teach about private things.
    In the UK the Roman Civil Law (Civil Law = Admiralty) and the English/Scottish/Irish/Welsh Common and Organic Law systems remain distinct. In Spain, France and other Napoleonic Code and Justinian jurisdictions perhaps not so. With respect to the United states of America, the same remains true. In the District of Columbia established in/on the Potomac there is admiralty, plain, simple--done. In de jure and organic Maryland, different story.

    Attachment 4635
    Especially lately I am under the impression that proper and even antioxidant-enhanced brain function is a deeply ascending spiritual experience. And by bouncing a ball on lengthy walks, in my left hand I have been growing parallel (female/yin) processing neurology on the right half of my brain where my thought system is not bound into the linear (illusion) that time exists. With that said, I am going to presume the reader understands my heritage in the Dutch East/West Indies Trading Company on Manhattan on both my mother's and my father's side. So I will work that in, without explanation through my Bill of Exchange that cites the 1629 Charter (as found in Attachment G starting at Page 45 of 62).

    What I want to focus on is the theft of Colorado as terrain/territory in 1861. Allodial's explanation is great with me until he says:

    Q. Why didn't I learn this is public school?
    A. Because public schools don't teach about private things.
    Looking at my complaint linked there, I have redacted it to five pages of text according to the Rules and so the bulk of it is oaths of office. My contention is Allodial may have figured this out by being highly intelligent, and having a very impressive library and so Allodial is able to say that ignorance of the law (public v private) is no excuse. - Even when explaining it to very intelligent people reading here. My claim is that when these officials pretend to be public, while operating in the private or vice versa and these are reversible according to perspective (district v territory), then that constitutes fraud and vitiates all contracts; a tenet I hold dear.

    I have been holding on (on my disk) to the Jubilee of the Constitution for a couple months, but interested because I thought it was a treatise on the constitution of (biblical) jubilee. [I should have thought before naming the file.] I pulled it out and discovered it was written by John Quincy ADAMS fifty years after the ratification of the Constitution. Then again there is John ADAMS who tended more toward the idealism we find (I gather) from the camp of Ed RIVERA.

    One fascinating item about pulling up JQA was that I had watched Amistad recently and was really considering the concept of calling on my ancestry; for obvious reasons. The earlier John ADAMS, in later years wrote of the decentralized federal government. But John Quincy ADAMS recites the reality of the last fifty years counting back from 1839 about how a compromise had been struck between state sovereignty and a cohesive federal government. I hope the reader can find time to at least skim what I am saying.

    All that to get to the '59'er's in the Central City and Auraria gold fields of Colorado.

    Here it would appear BUCHANAN, just before LINCOLN grabbed Colorado for a war chest, to fund something called The Union. This was a project to de-pluralize the States into a singular noun. Abraham LINCOLN was assassinated at that juncture where he was to end the "extraordinary occasion" of July 4, 1861 and bring the nation back to that balance. The Civil War stuck to things right up until the last few weeks when we found the Trading with the Enemy Act "Omitted" from the Bankers' Code. Notice in my Complaint that I Refuse for Cause the proposed SDR system, primarily because China cannot be pledged into BRICS while also a party to DRYEP as I call it, while actually collecting on the national debt as it does so. But as I say expressly, with no judiciary there is no real collections process to be hearing matters - with all the judgments being void anyway!

    In closing I remind the readers that Governor GILPIN issued notes without any authority from Washington DC, Congress or the Treasury, to pay Union s oldiers in the malformed Colorado Territory. This set the precedent for the Treasury to honor such capricious notes, develop Greenbacks and US notes and upon collateral shock testing in Canada with the Crown Dominion Notes make way to the Fed Act of 1913 under the penumbra IN GOD WE TRUST (Title 31 USC 5115). So there you have it - that same GIBBERISH SO HELP ME GOD.

    The contract is endorsement. Wow! I keep saying...

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    In closing I remind the readers that Governor GILPIN issued notes without any authority from Washington DC, Congress or the Treasury, to pay Union s oldiers in the malformed Colorado Territory. This set the precedent for the Treasury to honor such capricious notes, develop Greenbacks and US notes and upon collateral shock testing in Canada with the Crown Dominion Notes make way to the Fed Act of 1913 under the penumbra IN GOD WE TRUST (Title 31 USC 5115). So there you have it - that same GIBBERISH SO HELP ME GOD.
    One thing about GILPIN is he was born the same place as the United States of America of 1787 Constitution fame: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. And just the same attorneygeneral.gov takes you to the website of the Pennsylvania Attorney General rather than the website of the the U.S. AG. Perhaps GILPIN realized that the government of the United States had in some aspect met its demise at that point and took action based on his Pennsylvania heritage...speaking of heritage. Amazing what lurks between the lines sometimes.

    Name:  Constitution_signatures.jpg
Views: 85
Size:  2.70 MB

    It is so very well established (and anything contrary must needs be a super hoax) that when a government or state reaches its demise, the powers delegated to that state or government revert wholly to the source of that power. I must insert that in the event of the demise of the United States, power would not and could not revert to the U.N. (U.N. is not the source of power) it goes to the several states, to the people of America. The uncanny thing is that the U.N. (started to end wars and bring peace right?) only seems to 'go' where a jurisprudential vacuum of sorts exists (you know, the kind of vacuums created by wars, pandemics, widespread death, disorder, civil unrest, plagues, cities being set on fire, entire populations deemed 'lost at sea', chaos, etc.). Of course, disarming the remaindermen is what someone aiming to thwart the reversion would do (i.e. crippling your ability to put your own estate back in order if SHTF is an act of war). Believe me, if you walked into a military base in Country XYZ and took all of their weapons and disabled all of their tanks, aircraft and bombs they'd consider it an act of war. (Because that is what it is.) Even if you spewed out lots of sweet talk about protecting babies and old ladies, I suspect the nearest operational military unit would put you down ASAP. In plain and simple speak: forcible or coercive confiscation of weapons is unquestionably an act of war (and treason where applicable).

    If you called your nearest military base or the military base head in any country and asked them what would they do if you and some other men and women wanted to come to the base to take all of their guns and weapons and melt them down for scrap metal so there would be peace in the world what do you think they would tell you? What do you think they would do if you and twenty others showed up shortly after the call and were equipped with tools and smelters?
    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    I have been holding on (on my disk) to the Jubilee of the Constitution for a couple months, but interested because I thought it was a treatise on the constitution of (biblical) jubilee. [I should have thought before naming the file.] I pulled it out and discovered it was written by John Quincy ADAMS fifty years after the ratification of the Constitution. Then again there is John ADAMS who tended more toward the idealism we find (I gather) from the camp of Ed RIVERA.
    It may be that a compromise was struck inclusive of the Moors as well: two systems would run in parallel. It is suggested that the Civil War was fought because the Seminole Wars (conflicts arising against slavery errantly called 'rebellions') would have brought the Union to an end. The emancipation proclamation was probably itself part of the compromise.

    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    Looking at my complaint linked there, I have redacted it to five pages of text according to the Rules and so the bulk of it is oaths of office. My contention is Allodial may have figured this out by being highly intelligent, and having a very impressive library and so Allodial is able to say that ignorance of the law (public v private) is no excuse. - Even when explaining it to very intelligent people reading here. My claim is that when these officials pretend to be public, while operating in the private or vice versa and these are reversible according to perspective (district v territory), then that constitutes fraud and vitiates all contracts; a tenet I hold dear.
    I might be alluding moreso to the notion that, they aren't teaching students about their heritage: the private household/family is supposed to do that (something being left to the student's private household to contend with). It may very well be that the presumption is the student (is a CHILD that) has been abandoned to the State. Nonetheless, fraud vitiates contracts. Maybe the clerk wouldn't take gold coin for payment for colorable service because she could be strung up for that under organic Colorado law.

    On that note...

    Name:  MV5BMTEyODk5NTc2MjNeQTJeQWpwZ15BbWU4MDQ5NTgwOTkx._V1_UY1200_CR90,0,630,1200_AL_.jpg
Views: 77
Size:  113.5 KB

    Name:  250px-1860_colorado_territory_map.png
Views: 78
Size:  34.2 KB

    The new HBO series Westworld is filmed mainly at Moab (estab. 1878), Utah ((Utah ["Judah"]) Territory) with the Colorado River as part of the scenery.
    Last edited by allodial; 10-29-16 at 09:22 PM. Reason: some italics showing edits to correct typos, etc.
    All rights reserved. Without prejudice. No liability assumed. No value assured.

    "The object in life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius
    "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter." Proverbs 25:2
    Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. Thess. 5:21.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •