Colorado Territory Stolen in 1861 - Captured the World!

[allodial]

In closing I remind the readers that Governor GILPIN issued notes without any authority from Washington DC, Congress or the Treasury, to pay Union s oldiers in the malformed Colorado Territory. This set the precedent for the Treasury to honor such capricious notes, develop Greenbacks and US notes and upon collateral shock testing in Canada with the Crown Dominion Notes make way to the Fed Act of 1913 under the penumbra IN GOD WE TRUST (Title 31 USC 5115). So there you have it - that same GIBBERISH SO HELP ME GOD.

One thing about GILPIN is he was born the same place as the United States of America of 1787 Constitution fame: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. And just the same attorneygeneral.gov takes you to the website of the Pennsylvania Attorney General rather than the website of the the U.S. AG. Perhaps GILPIN realized that the government of the United States had in some aspect met its demise at that point and took action based on his Pennsylvania heritage...speaking of heritage. Amazing what lurks between the lines sometimes.

Attachment 4636

It is so very well established (and anything contrary must needs be a super hoax) that when a government or state reaches its demise, the powers delegated to that state or government revert wholly to the source of that power. I must insert that in the event of the demise of the United States, power would not and could not revert to the U.N. (U.N. is not the source of power) it goes to the several states, to the people of America. The uncanny thing is that the U.N. (started to end wars and bring peace right?) only seems to 'go' where a jurisprudential vacuum of sorts exists (you know, the kind of vacuums created by wars, pandemics, widespread death, disorder, civil unrest, plagues, cities being set on fire, entire populations deemed 'lost at sea', chaos, etc.). Of course, disarming the remaindermen is what someone aiming to thwart the reversion would do (i.e. crippling your ability to put your own estate back in order if SHTF is an act of war). Believe me, if you walked into a military base in Country XYZ and took all of their weapons and disabled all of their tanks, aircraft and bombs they'd consider it an act of war. (Because that is what it is.) Even if you spewed out lots of sweet talk about protecting babies and old ladies, I suspect the nearest operational military unit would put you down ASAP. In plain and simple speak: forcible or coercive confiscation of weapons is unquestionably an act of war (and treason where applicable).

If you called your nearest military base or the military base head in any country and asked them what would they do if you and some other men and women wanted to come to the base to take all of their guns and weapons and melt them down for scrap metal so there would be peace in the world what do you think they would tell you? What do you think they would do if you and twenty others showed up shortly after the call and were equipped with tools and smelters?

I have been holding on (on my disk) to the Jubilee of the Constitution for a couple months, but interested because I thought it was a treatise on the constitution of (biblical) jubilee. [I should have thought before naming the file.] I pulled it out and discovered it was written by John Quincy ADAMS fifty years after the ratification of the Constitution. Then again there is John ADAMS who tended more toward the idealism we find (I gather) from the camp of Ed RIVERA.

It may be that a compromise was struck inclusive of the Moors as well: two systems would run in parallel. It is suggested that the Civil War was fought because the Seminole Wars (conflicts arising against slavery errantly called 'rebellions') would have brought the Union to an end. The emancipation proclamation was probably itself part of the compromise.

Looking at my complaint linked there, I have redacted it to five pages of text according to the Rules and so the bulk of it is oaths of office. My contention is Allodial may have figured this out by being highly intelligent, and having a very impressive library and so Allodial is able to say that ignorance of the law (public v private) is no excuse. - Even when explaining it to very intelligent people reading here. My claim is that when these officials pretend to be public, while operating in the private or vice versa and these are reversible according to perspective (district v territory), then that constitutes fraud and vitiates all contracts; a tenet I hold dear.

I might be alluding moreso to the notion that, they aren't teaching students about their heritage: the private household/family is supposed to do that (something being left to the student's private household to contend with). It may very well be that the presumption is the student (is a CHILD that) has been abandoned to the State. Nonetheless, fraud vitiates contracts. Maybe the clerk wouldn't take gold coin for payment for colorable service because she could be strung up for that under organic Colorado law.

On that note...





The new HBO series Westworld is filmed mainly at Moab (estab. 1878), Utah ((Utah ["Judah"]) Territory) with the Colorado River as part of the scenery.