Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: Transgress the Law?

  1. #11

    Law of Gravity

    Quote Originally Posted by george View Post
    hi all,

    "Transgress the Law"

    what does this mean to you? (anyone reading)

    thanks
    To say that a stone that falls to earth because it is obeying a law then law makes it a man and then that man again a citizen. under scientific authority pond pebbles of wisdom foundation rocks need never secular fall on my head.secular stones each man grows his own.CS Lewis george

  2. #12
    might need to come up with a name for the dog.

    there seems to be some kind of boundary between Law and Equity but with some overlap. some suggest the chancery or equitable courts are still accessible, others have said its the probate courts.

    i just dont see how any of the current system can be of any use? just too many examples of corruption as verified here by David and many others elsewhere.

    this gals latest video sums it up nicely i think : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCasfpQw7gk

    needs to be a way to find and administer justice that doesnt require or allow BAR Guild members, until then, I just cant see how anything can be equitable?

  3. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by george View Post
    is it possible to transgress the law boundary by going to equity and if so, would that also be 'sin'?
    I think of sin as the emotion that follows a perceived transgression. There can be no real transgression of law, abiding in the definition of law. A pebble flying for no reason up into the sky would be a transgression of the law. Fish falling from the sky seems too weird until you consider typhoons scoop up fish and treat the fish like hailstones. God knocking up virgins seems quite strange too, until you consider Jesus' dad was the King of Israel, an embarrassed teen. Raising Lazarus from the dead is an obvious transgression from the law; necromancy in fact. So rationalize that Jesus can break His Father's laws? Or better yet notice that Jesus' Star Performance and highlight of his ministry only appears in one Gospel...

    I will skip the necromancy accused upon the Cross.

    The Stone that transgresses is a Man? I noticed the guilt trip inherent while singing a short song at a sidewalk cafe.


    Name:  sons are stones.jpg
Views: 86
Size:  443.5 KB


    Jim built Bishop Castle for the People.



    Name:  aerial photo.jpg
Views: 86
Size:  376.2 KB
    Last edited by David Merrill; 05-29-17 at 12:47 PM.

  4. #14
    it would seem that there can be no transgression of a Law of physics anyway, if one could transgress those laws, sin would then be a miracle.

    ive heard some say those fish falling from the sky were from the destruction of earths sister planet tiamat (and that that is where the spirits of the fake jews also came from) hearsay to me, but so is all that stuff in the bible too. i have no doubt there is something to it but no first hand experience to back it up. and my reasoning prevents me from having the faith to actually trust any others interpretations either.

    man, those folks atop the castle in that photo surely have a trust in Jim Bishop! or faith?

  5. #15
    A Dog called Equity beggin for benefits and forming a trust The Bond .Private equity once you have NAMED this dog the day he answers or submits too your authority you both now seek that benefit . Do the scales of justice follow a physical law . Instead of punishing you for making the wrong choice, the state simply eliminates all your choice. Instead being told to pay taxes, taxes are automatically deducted from paychecks.the equity of Solomon when he is dividing a baby . What half can produce the greater dividend. call the the dog Oz george .

  6. #16
    House has equity free of debt or other financial liability. interest in their real property equitable courts are still accessible, others have said its the probate courts. courts are both courts of law and courts of equity, but the court does not have free reign to ignore the rule of law and impose equity whenever is desires to do so. There are rules that dictate when equity can be used and when it cannot be used.A murder trial and us the public shareholders .

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by xparte View Post
    House has equity free of debt or other financial liability. interest in their real property equitable courts are still accessible, others have said its the probate courts. courts are both courts of law and courts of equity, but the court does not have free reign to ignore the rule of law and impose equity whenever is desires to do so. There are rules that dictate when equity can be used and when it cannot be used.A murder trial and us the public shareholders .
    Colorado history is rich and replete with the blending (1935) that did not occur until 1938 in the federal venue.


    Name:  Colorado Law Books 1935 1.jpg
Views: 85
Size:  145.6 KB


    Name:  colorado law books 1935 one form s.jpg
Views: 75
Size:  122.5 KB

    Prior to the formation of the Government Bonds Trust in 1933 though, this was quite unlawful. BENNETT v BUTTERWORTH; 52 US 669:


    Name:  Government bonds safe.jpg
Views: 81
Size:  327.4 KB



    Name:  Bennett on Blending.jpg
Views: 82
Size:  212.1 KB

  8. #18
    The new trust (New Deal) opened the door to the formation of a new style of CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST.


    Name:  colorado law books 1935 one form small.jpg
Views: 82
Size:  76.1 KB

  9. #19

    Equity or probative Gold Seizure

    Quote Originally Posted by David Merrill View Post
    The new trust (New Deal) opened the door to the formation of a new style of CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST.


    Name:  colorado law books 1935 one form small.jpg
Views: 82
Size:  76.1 KB
    The new deal and a UPPER case style Probate assets are any assets that are owned solely by the decedent. a non probate insurance policy does not need to be disclosed during probate. Is my SS# ever disclosed Courts of equity have already acquired such an extent of jurisdiction, as to obscure in a great measure courts of law. till first a clear idea be formed of the difference between a court of law and a court of equity. But if a court of equity be governed by rules, why are not these brought to light in a fair system? One would imagine, that such a fair system should not be useful only, but necessary; and yet writers, far from aiming at a fair system, have not even defined with any accuracy what equity is, nor what are its limits and extent. One operation of equity, universally acknowledged, is, to remedy imperfections in the common law, which sometimes is defective, and sometimes exceeds just bounds; and as equity is constantly opposed to common law, a just idea of the latter fairness may probably lead to the former. In order to ascertain what is meant by common law, a historical deduction is necessary; After states were formed and government established, courts of law were invented to compel individuals to do their duty. This innovation, as commonly happens, was at first confined within narrow bounds FAIRNESS . To these courts power was given to enforce duties essential to the existence of society; Thus equity, in its proper sense, comprehends every matter of law that by the common law is left without remedy; and supposing the boundaries of the common law to be ascertained, there can no longer remain any difficulty about the powers of a court of equity. it will be discovered, that the connections regarded by a court of equity seldom arise from personal circumstances, such as birth, resemblance of condition, or even blood, but generally from subjects that in common language are denominated goods those financial instruments, including currency notes and coins, as well as bonds and other fixed-income . But for the security of individuals in society, it is not sufficient that a man himself be prohibited from doing mischief: he ought over and above to be careful and vigilant, that persons, animals, and things, under his power, do no mischief;Is a persona mischievous in equity only.

  10. #20
    One important rule is that judges be bonded through their oath of office. They cannot change the oath and then sign it.

    I find it enlightening that a "judge" redacted his own signature before incriminating himself. Download the attachment please - it may become recognized American History!


    Attachment 4897
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by David Merrill; 05-30-17 at 01:14 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •